RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    가계 식료품 소비지출의 비교연구 -도시가구 맞벌이여부를 중심으로- = Comparison Study of Household Food Consumption Expenditure -About Urban Households Dual Earner or Not-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60015663

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper showed about comparative study of food consumption expenditure between dual-earner or not, and summarized as follows. (1) the proportion of the food, alcohol and tobacco, clothing and shoes, domestic goods, domestic services, recreation and culture dwindled away. Whereas, that of transportation, communications, education, and food. accommodations and other goods and services were increased. (2) the dual-earner or not spent the same larger proportion of dining-out. However that of other food expenditure was small for dual-earner or not. The dual-earner proportion of dining-out expenditure was larger than that of non-dual earner. However, the proportion of foodstuffs expenditure of dual-earner was smaller than that of non-dual earner. (3) the income elasticities of demand of favorite food and dining-out were larger than that of staple food and side dish. Except meats, fruits, beverages, the income elasticities of demand of almost non-dual earner were larger than that of dual-earner. (4) price elasticities of meat, fish & shellfish, vegetables & seaweeds, beverages, alcoholic beverages, other food, dining-out were relatively elastic for all dual-earner or not. Whereas the grains, dairy(milk, cheese & eggs), fruits, confectionery, tea were inelastic. Except meats, fruits, tea, price elasticities of demand of almost other foodstuffs for non-dual earner were larger than that of dual-earner. (5) finally showed that the income and price elasticities of dining-out for urban households were larger than that of other foodstuffs.
    번역하기

    This paper showed about comparative study of food consumption expenditure between dual-earner or not, and summarized as follows. (1) the proportion of the food, alcohol and tobacco, clothing and shoes, domestic goods, domestic services, recreation and...

    This paper showed about comparative study of food consumption expenditure between dual-earner or not, and summarized as follows. (1) the proportion of the food, alcohol and tobacco, clothing and shoes, domestic goods, domestic services, recreation and culture dwindled away. Whereas, that of transportation, communications, education, and food. accommodations and other goods and services were increased. (2) the dual-earner or not spent the same larger proportion of dining-out. However that of other food expenditure was small for dual-earner or not. The dual-earner proportion of dining-out expenditure was larger than that of non-dual earner. However, the proportion of foodstuffs expenditure of dual-earner was smaller than that of non-dual earner. (3) the income elasticities of demand of favorite food and dining-out were larger than that of staple food and side dish. Except meats, fruits, beverages, the income elasticities of demand of almost non-dual earner were larger than that of dual-earner. (4) price elasticities of meat, fish & shellfish, vegetables & seaweeds, beverages, alcoholic beverages, other food, dining-out were relatively elastic for all dual-earner or not. Whereas the grains, dairy(milk, cheese & eggs), fruits, confectionery, tea were inelastic. Except meats, fruits, tea, price elasticities of demand of almost other foodstuffs for non-dual earner were larger than that of dual-earner. (5) finally showed that the income and price elasticities of dining-out for urban households were larger than that of other foodstuffs.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼