RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    명의신탁재산의 증여의제에 있어서 조세회피 목적의 유무 = The Purpose of Tax Evasion in Constructive Gift for Nominal Trust

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104295130

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    According to the precedent, nominal trust is such a theory that in the internal relations between the parties, trustor has an ownership, can use, make profits of, and dispose of an object in trust but in the eaternal relations against a third party though trustee has the nominal ownership in the public registration, trustee shall be regarded as perfect owner.
    The Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Law regards the registration of properties other than real estate in other person's name as donation to the nominal owner and usually levy a gift tax on the properties. The legislative purpose is to prevent the evasion of overall taxes including national tax, local tax and custom duties.
    Nominal trusts should be classified into two groups. One of them is the normal nominal trusts, the other is the nominal trusts for the purpose of tax evasion.
    Whether levy a gift tax or not, in constructive gift for nominal trust depends on the purpose of tax evasion, and the burden of proof should generally be on the taxpayer to prove that a transaction was a normal nominal Trust.
    In this paper, we will look at recent cases in the courts on the tax avoidance in applying constructive gift for nominal trust, and some problems of the current Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Law system for the prevention of tax avoidance.
    We have found out some problems of the current constructive gift for the nominal trust. The most important problem is that the imposing a gift tax to the constructive gift for nominal trust is not harmonized with the principal of the Tax Law in both legislative and judical approaches. This paper make some proposals for the improvement of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Law system.
    번역하기

    According to the precedent, nominal trust is such a theory that in the internal relations between the parties, trustor has an ownership, can use, make profits of, and dispose of an object in trust but in the eaternal relations against a third party th...

    According to the precedent, nominal trust is such a theory that in the internal relations between the parties, trustor has an ownership, can use, make profits of, and dispose of an object in trust but in the eaternal relations against a third party though trustee has the nominal ownership in the public registration, trustee shall be regarded as perfect owner.
    The Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Law regards the registration of properties other than real estate in other person's name as donation to the nominal owner and usually levy a gift tax on the properties. The legislative purpose is to prevent the evasion of overall taxes including national tax, local tax and custom duties.
    Nominal trusts should be classified into two groups. One of them is the normal nominal trusts, the other is the nominal trusts for the purpose of tax evasion.
    Whether levy a gift tax or not, in constructive gift for nominal trust depends on the purpose of tax evasion, and the burden of proof should generally be on the taxpayer to prove that a transaction was a normal nominal Trust.
    In this paper, we will look at recent cases in the courts on the tax avoidance in applying constructive gift for nominal trust, and some problems of the current Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Law system for the prevention of tax avoidance.
    We have found out some problems of the current constructive gift for the nominal trust. The most important problem is that the imposing a gift tax to the constructive gift for nominal trust is not harmonized with the principal of the Tax Law in both legislative and judical approaches. This paper make some proposals for the improvement of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Law system.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 강인애, "추보 조세법Ⅶ" 한일조세연구소 2005

    2 이태로, "조세법강의" 박영사 2003

    3 임승순, "조세법" 박영사 2006

    4 최명근, "세법학총론" 세경사 2004

    5 이창희, "세법강의" 박영사 2007

    6 이전오, "명의신탁재산의 증여의제 규정상 조세회피 목적의 범위" (여름) : 2006

    7 신용주, "명의신탁으로 인한 증여의제 과세의 문제점과 개선방안" 한국조세연구포럼 4 : 2005

    8 강석훈, "명의신탁 주식의 증여의제에 관한 판례의 태도 및 그 해석론" 8 : 2006

    9 淸永敬次, "租稅回避の硏究" ミネルウァ書房 1995

    10 Kruse, Heinrich Wilhelm, "Lehrbuch des Steuerrechts, Bd, I" Verlag C.H, Beck 1991

    1 강인애, "추보 조세법Ⅶ" 한일조세연구소 2005

    2 이태로, "조세법강의" 박영사 2003

    3 임승순, "조세법" 박영사 2006

    4 최명근, "세법학총론" 세경사 2004

    5 이창희, "세법강의" 박영사 2007

    6 이전오, "명의신탁재산의 증여의제 규정상 조세회피 목적의 범위" (여름) : 2006

    7 신용주, "명의신탁으로 인한 증여의제 과세의 문제점과 개선방안" 한국조세연구포럼 4 : 2005

    8 강석훈, "명의신탁 주식의 증여의제에 관한 판례의 태도 및 그 해석론" 8 : 2006

    9 淸永敬次, "租稅回避の硏究" ミネルウァ書房 1995

    10 Kruse, Heinrich Wilhelm, "Lehrbuch des Steuerrechts, Bd, I" Verlag C.H, Beck 1991

    11 Hartmann, Bernhard, "Auslegung und Anwendung von Steuergesetzen, Grundlagen der Rechtsanwendung" Erich Schmidt Verlag 1984

    12 Klein, Franz, "Abgabenordnung-Kommentar, 4Aufl." C.H, Beck Verlag 1989

    13 Kuhn, R., "Abgabenordnung, 17Aufl." Schaffter-Poeschel Verlag 1995

    14 유철형, "2006년도 상속세 및 증여세법 판례회고" 한국세법학회 13 (13): 2007

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.98 0.98 1.03
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.37 1.48 1.713 0.03
    더보기

    연관 공개강의(KOCW)

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼