RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    소유지배괴리도가 자기주식취득과 현금배당에 미치는 영향

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856906

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study seeks to explore how share repurchase and dividend policies are influenced by the disproportionately stronger voting rights of controlling shareholders. Prior literature shows that stock markets in general respond favorably to a company`s announcement of share repurchases for a short-term period. In Korea. however, some studies examining the long-term performance of the stock repurchases show mixed results, with more negative relationship between share repurchase and long-term performance. Although share repurchases and cash dividends have been perceived as similar devices to distribute profits, evidence from prior studies indicates that the two devices have different impact on the capital markets. The major differences between share repurchases and dividends can be characterized as follows. First, controlling shareholders can repurchase shares with smaller cash than dividends because share repurchases are usually limited to minor proportion of outstanding shares. Second. share repurchases are not subject to cash 110w restrictions at the end of fiscal year because buying and selling of treasury stocks can be made rather freely throughout the year Third. share repurchases are relatively more discretionary than dividends because dividends are considered compulsory to meet the expectations of shareholders. Based on the preceding analogy, we ran argue that stock repurchases can be utilized opportunistically by controlling shareholders, especially when they can exercise voting rights more than their cash flow rights. Our main variables of interest include the wedge which is measured as the gap between the voting rights and cash-flow rights of controlling shareholders (GAP). net income (NI). and cash flow from operations (CFO). Control variables included in our model are growth of sales (GROW), leverage ratio (LEV). firm size (SIZE). foreign ownership (FOR), the volatility of stock price (VOL) and price to book value ratio (PBR). The main test methods used in our study are mean-difference tests and multiple linear regression analyses. The test sample consists of 327 firm-year observations, selected from the Korea Stack Exchange (KSE) companies during the period of 2004 to 2006. The empirical evidence shows that firms for which the gap is big tend to repurchase more shares. This might be because controlling shareholders with disproportionately stronger voting rights are better able to exploit external shareholders. Firms for which the gap is low, on the contrary, distribute more cash dividends to shareholders. We find that share-repurchasing firms without cash dividends have significantly lower operating cash flows than the control groups. We may infer that firms with inferior cash flows tend to utilize share repurchase to deceive investors. Overall. the results of this study show that controlling shareholders use share repurchases as a device of temporary opportunism.
    번역하기

    This study seeks to explore how share repurchase and dividend policies are influenced by the disproportionately stronger voting rights of controlling shareholders. Prior literature shows that stock markets in general respond favorably to a company`s a...

    This study seeks to explore how share repurchase and dividend policies are influenced by the disproportionately stronger voting rights of controlling shareholders. Prior literature shows that stock markets in general respond favorably to a company`s announcement of share repurchases for a short-term period. In Korea. however, some studies examining the long-term performance of the stock repurchases show mixed results, with more negative relationship between share repurchase and long-term performance. Although share repurchases and cash dividends have been perceived as similar devices to distribute profits, evidence from prior studies indicates that the two devices have different impact on the capital markets. The major differences between share repurchases and dividends can be characterized as follows. First, controlling shareholders can repurchase shares with smaller cash than dividends because share repurchases are usually limited to minor proportion of outstanding shares. Second. share repurchases are not subject to cash 110w restrictions at the end of fiscal year because buying and selling of treasury stocks can be made rather freely throughout the year Third. share repurchases are relatively more discretionary than dividends because dividends are considered compulsory to meet the expectations of shareholders. Based on the preceding analogy, we ran argue that stock repurchases can be utilized opportunistically by controlling shareholders, especially when they can exercise voting rights more than their cash flow rights. Our main variables of interest include the wedge which is measured as the gap between the voting rights and cash-flow rights of controlling shareholders (GAP). net income (NI). and cash flow from operations (CFO). Control variables included in our model are growth of sales (GROW), leverage ratio (LEV). firm size (SIZE). foreign ownership (FOR), the volatility of stock price (VOL) and price to book value ratio (PBR). The main test methods used in our study are mean-difference tests and multiple linear regression analyses. The test sample consists of 327 firm-year observations, selected from the Korea Stack Exchange (KSE) companies during the period of 2004 to 2006. The empirical evidence shows that firms for which the gap is big tend to repurchase more shares. This might be because controlling shareholders with disproportionately stronger voting rights are better able to exploit external shareholders. Firms for which the gap is low, on the contrary, distribute more cash dividends to shareholders. We find that share-repurchasing firms without cash dividends have significantly lower operating cash flows than the control groups. We may infer that firms with inferior cash flows tend to utilize share repurchase to deceive investors. Overall. the results of this study show that controlling shareholders use share repurchases as a device of temporary opportunism.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 안홍복, "지배주주의 지배-소유권 차이와 이익조정의 관련성 분석" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 117-154, 2004

    2 정성창, "자사주 취득 기업들의 장기성과에 관한 연구" 한국재무학회 16 (16): 129-162, 2003

    3 설원식, "자사주 매입이 기업의 배당 및 장기성과에 미치는 영향" 한국산업경제학회 17 (17): 1291-1315, 2004

    4 변진호, "자사주 매입 기회주의 가설과 대주주의 보유주식 매도 거래" 한국경영학회 35 (35): 695-715, 2006

    5 정성창, "유상증자와 자사주취득의 동기:불공정거래 가능성의 제기" 한국증권학회 33 (33): 123-156, 2004

    6 김효진, "소유지배괴리도가 기업지배구조와 이익조정에 미치는 영향" 한국회계정보학회 28 (28): 1-32, 2010

    7 "http://www.kind.sm.krx.co.kr/"

    8 "http://www.ftc.go.kr/"

    9 Richard J., "When Do Share Repurchases Increase Shareholder Wealth?" 16 (16): 31-36, 2006

    10 Nenova, T., "The Value of Corporate Votes and Control Benefits: A Cross-country Analysis" 68 : 325-351, 2003

    1 안홍복, "지배주주의 지배-소유권 차이와 이익조정의 관련성 분석" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 117-154, 2004

    2 정성창, "자사주 취득 기업들의 장기성과에 관한 연구" 한국재무학회 16 (16): 129-162, 2003

    3 설원식, "자사주 매입이 기업의 배당 및 장기성과에 미치는 영향" 한국산업경제학회 17 (17): 1291-1315, 2004

    4 변진호, "자사주 매입 기회주의 가설과 대주주의 보유주식 매도 거래" 한국경영학회 35 (35): 695-715, 2006

    5 정성창, "유상증자와 자사주취득의 동기:불공정거래 가능성의 제기" 한국증권학회 33 (33): 123-156, 2004

    6 김효진, "소유지배괴리도가 기업지배구조와 이익조정에 미치는 영향" 한국회계정보학회 28 (28): 1-32, 2010

    7 "http://www.kind.sm.krx.co.kr/"

    8 "http://www.ftc.go.kr/"

    9 Richard J., "When Do Share Repurchases Increase Shareholder Wealth?" 16 (16): 31-36, 2006

    10 Nenova, T., "The Value of Corporate Votes and Control Benefits: A Cross-country Analysis" 68 : 325-351, 2003

    11 Bebchuk, L. A., "Stock Pyramids, Cross-Ownership and Dual Class Equity: The Mechanisms and Agency Costs of Separating Control From Cash-Flow Right" Concentrated Corporate Ownership 445-460, 2000

    12 Brennan, M., "Shareholder Preferences and Dividend Policy" 45 (45): 993-1018, 1990

    13 Baker, H., "Revisiting the Dividend Puzzle: Do All of Piece now Fit?" 11 : 241-261, 2002

    14 Allen, F., "Payout Policy. Working Paper" University of Pennsylvania 2002

    15 Kim, J-B., "Ownership Structure, Business Group Affiliation, Listing Status, and Earnings Management: Evidence from Korea" 23 : 427-464, 2006

    16 Fried, J., "Open Market Repurchases: Signalling or Managerial Opportunism?" 2 : 865-894, 2001

    17 Stulz, R., "Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies" 26 : 3-27, 1990

    18 La Porta, R., "Law and finance" 106 : 1113-1155, 1998

    19 Villalonga, B., "How do family ownership, control, and management affect firm value?" 80 : 385-417, 2006

    20 Jagannathan, M., "Financial Flexibility and the Choice between Dividends and Stock Repurchases" 57 : 355-384, 2000

    21 Chou, D., "False Signals from Stock Repurchase Announcements: Evidence from Earnings Management and Analysts' Forecast Revisions" 1-36, 2004

    22 Francis, J., "Earnings and Dividend informativeness when cash flow rights are separated from voting rights" 39 : 329-360, 2005

    23 Leuz, C., "Earnings Management and Investor Protection:an international comparison" 69 : 505-527, 2003

    24 Grullon, G., "Dividends, Share Repurchase, and the Substitution Hypothesis" 57 (57): 1649-1684, 2002

    25 Miller, M., "Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Share" 34 : 411-433, 1961

    26 Choi, D., "Dividend Policy in Korea: How Korean Firms Make Dividend Decisions" Seoul National University Press 2005

    27 Claessens, S., "Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings" 57 : 2741-2772, 2002

    28 Fama, E., "Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?" 60 : 3-43, 2001

    29 Joh, S., "Corporate Restructuring. in: The Korean Economy beyond the Crisis" Edward Elgar 2004

    30 Barclay, M., "Corporate Payout Policy: Cash dividends versus open market repurchases" 22 : 61-82, 1988

    31 Fenn, G., "Corporate Payout Policy and Managerial Stock Incentives" 60 : 45-72, 2001

    32 La Porta, R., "Corporate Ownership and the World" 54 : 471-518, 1999

    33 Fan, P. H., "Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia" 33 : 401-425, 2002

    34 Baek, J., "Corporate Governance and Firm Value: Evidence from the Korean Financial Crisis" 71 : 265-313, 2004

    35 Joh, S., "Corporate Governance and Firm Profitability: Evidence from Korea before the economic crisis" 68 : 287-322, 2003

    36 Jensen, M., "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers" 76 : 323-329, 1986

    37 Allen, F., "A Theory of Dividends Based on Tax Clienteles" 55 (55): 2499-2536, 2000

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼