한국어 학습자와 교사의 구어오류수정에 대한 인식 연구 = Korean Language Teachers and Students' Perception on Spoken Error Feedback.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aimed firstly to investigate perception on spoken error feedback of English speaking Korean learners and their teachers, and that of Chinese speaking Korean learners and their teachers, secondly to compare them to figure out the best type of feedback. There was no big difference between the learner groups except 'who corrected errors.' All learners and teachers agreed strongly to receive spoken error feedback. Both American learners and Chinese learners perceived to receive spoken error feedback more frequently than teachers did. The best timing for feedback was perceived to be 'after I speak'. Teachers focused on serious and frequent errors to be corrected while learners took every error to be corrected regardless of its seriousness and frequency. There was discrepancy of perception on ways of feedback between teachers and learners. Learners perceived direct way of correction effectively such as explicit feedback and meta-linguistic feedback whereas teachers did indirect way of correction more effectively such as implicit feedback and repetition. The biggest discrepancy was found in explicit feedback. However, both learners and teachers perceived confirmation check very effectively. Both American learners and Chinese learners preferred to be corrected firstly by native Korean teachers, but secondly American learners preferred themselves differently from Chinese learners who preferred Chinese speaking Korean teachers. (Kyunghee University)

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 진제희, "한국어 수업에 나타난 교사의 수정적 피드백과 학습자 반응 연구" 이중언어학회 (28) : 371-390, 2005

2 박주현, "교사 피드백 방법이 한국어 학습자 작문의 형태 오류 감소에 미치는 영향" 국제한국어교육학회 18 (18): 125-148, 2007

3 Wang, H-S., "The effect of topic on lexical errors in writings by intermediate learners of Korean" 2 : 39-56, 1996

4 DeKeyser, R., "The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency" 77 : 501-514, 1993

5 Horwitz, E. K., "The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students" 72 : 283-294, 1988

6 Kim, H-Y., "Strategies for improving accuracy in KSL: Developmental errors and an error-correction code" 2 : 231-248, 2000

7 Doughty, C., "Second language instruction does make a difference" 13 : 431-469, 1991

8 김지현, "Recasts in Meaning-based EFL Classrooms: Learner Uptake and Characteristics of Recasts" 한국영어교육학회 64 (64): 107-131, 2009

9 Krashen, S., "Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition" Prentice-Hall 1987

10 Wang, H-S., "Pragmatic errors and teaching for pragmatic competence" 3 : 127-143, 1997

11 Lyster, R., "Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms" 48 (48): 183-218, 1998

12 Ellis, N., "Memory for language. in: Cognition and Second Language Instruction" Cambridge University Press 33-68, 2001

13 Freiermuth, M., "L2 error correction: Criteria and techniques"

14 Jeon, M., "Investigating Student Preferences in Error Correction in Korean-Language Teaching" 10 : 19-36, 2005

15 Long, M., "Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. in: Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition" Cambridge University Press 15-41, 1998

16 Swain, M., "Focus on form through conscious rejection. in: Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition" Cambridge University Press 64-82, 1998

17 Schultz, R. A., "Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students' and teachers' view on error correction and the role of grammar" 29 (29): 343-350, 1996

18 Fukuda, Y., "Error treatment in oral communication classes in Japanese high school and communication classes. Unpublished Master's Thesis" San Francisco State University 2003

19 Lee, J., "Error analysis and corrective measures for intermediate Korean language in America" 4 : 163-179, 1999

20 Long, M., "Does second language instruction makes a difference? A review of research" 17 : 35-82, 1983

21 Schultz, R. A., "Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia" 85 : 244-257, 2001

22 Schacter, J., "Corrective feedback in historical perspective" 7 : 89-102, 1991

23 Lyster, R., "Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms" 19 : 37-66, 1997

24 Doughty, C., "Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. in: Cognition and Second Language Instruction" Cambridge University Press 206-257, 2001

25 Schmidt, R., "Attention. in: Cognition and Second Language Instruction" Cambridge University Press 3-32, 2001

26 Dodigovic, M., "Artificial Intelligence and Second Language Learning: An Efficient Approach to Error Remediation" 16 (16): 99-113, 2007

27 Ellis, R., "Are classroom naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules" 11 : 305-328, 1989

28 Kim, E-J., "An analysis of particle errors by heritage and non-heritage learners of Korean" 8 : 37-49, 2003

29 Lee, S-I, "An analysis of errors in speaking practice" 6 : 225-248, 2001

30 Julie Damron, "A Study on the Students' Error Feedback Preferences According to roficiency Level" 국제한국어교육학회 20 (20): 337-358, 2009