RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      학생의 강의 평가에 대한 기초 연구 = A Basic Study on Student Evaluations of Instruction

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19550554

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Complex problems exists in student evaluations of instructions. There are too many variables to be considered for implementation of student evaluation system, If we hurry to put the system into practice without broad basic studies, we will face the failure before we can establish the system.
      One of the purposes of this study is to review the research literature on the student valuation in the U.S. A. and the advanced countries in which student evaluation is o prevalent that many critical issues have already been raised and in the process of solution.
      The second purpose of this study is to construct and revise a student rating scale by testing the reliability and validity.
      The third purpose of this study is to clarify the variables which influences the student evaluations. The variables such as course classification (general education or major/requirements or electives, class size) , instructer characteristics(sex, rear of teaching experience, status) and student characteristics( college belonged, grade) are included.
      The fourth purpose of this study is to solver the students' and faculties' satisfaction of the evaluation.
      The final purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between research products and ratings of instruction
      The data showed that the developed rating scale seemed to be reliable and valid. And the several variables studied have significant relationships with student evaluations. Courses in general education are rated lower than those in majors. Students are more satisfied with the small class size(less than 50 students) than the large one (any sizes more than 51 students). The more teaching expriences an instructer has, the more the students are satisfied with. Freshmen rated their courses lower than juniors or seniors did. Both students and faculties responded positively to the results of the evaluations. But both group are not satisfied with the items of the evaluation scale. It is suggested that a revision should be made in the direction of integrating the items into a few global ones. There is a very low positive correlation between research products and student ratings of instructions.
      번역하기

      Complex problems exists in student evaluations of instructions. There are too many variables to be considered for implementation of student evaluation system, If we hurry to put the system into practice without broad basic studies, we will face the fa...

      Complex problems exists in student evaluations of instructions. There are too many variables to be considered for implementation of student evaluation system, If we hurry to put the system into practice without broad basic studies, we will face the failure before we can establish the system.
      One of the purposes of this study is to review the research literature on the student valuation in the U.S. A. and the advanced countries in which student evaluation is o prevalent that many critical issues have already been raised and in the process of solution.
      The second purpose of this study is to construct and revise a student rating scale by testing the reliability and validity.
      The third purpose of this study is to clarify the variables which influences the student evaluations. The variables such as course classification (general education or major/requirements or electives, class size) , instructer characteristics(sex, rear of teaching experience, status) and student characteristics( college belonged, grade) are included.
      The fourth purpose of this study is to solver the students' and faculties' satisfaction of the evaluation.
      The final purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between research products and ratings of instruction
      The data showed that the developed rating scale seemed to be reliable and valid. And the several variables studied have significant relationships with student evaluations. Courses in general education are rated lower than those in majors. Students are more satisfied with the small class size(less than 50 students) than the large one (any sizes more than 51 students). The more teaching expriences an instructer has, the more the students are satisfied with. Freshmen rated their courses lower than juniors or seniors did. Both students and faculties responded positively to the results of the evaluations. But both group are not satisfied with the items of the evaluation scale. It is suggested that a revision should be made in the direction of integrating the items into a few global ones. There is a very low positive correlation between research products and student ratings of instructions.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • ABSTRACT
      • I. 연구의 목적 및 내용
      • 1. 연구의 목적 및 필요성
      • 2. 연구의 내용
      • II. 선행 연구 고찰
      • ABSTRACT
      • I. 연구의 목적 및 내용
      • 1. 연구의 목적 및 필요성
      • 2. 연구의 내용
      • II. 선행 연구 고찰
      • 1. 강의 평가 운영에 대한 연구
      • 2. 강의 평가에 영향을 주는 교수의 인적 환경적요인들
      • 4. 학생의 강의 평가에 대한 교수들의 태도
      • III. 연구방법
      • 1. 연구 대상 및 연구 도구
      • 2. 분석방법
      • IV. 연구결과 및 해석
      • 1. 평가지의 신뢰도 타당도
      • 2. 학생 관련 변인에 대한 분석
      • 3. 강의에 대한 평가 결과 분석
      • 4. 교수, 학생의 강의평가 대한 설문지 조사
      • V. 결론 및 제언
      • 참고문헌
      • 부록
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼