RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Case Studies of Disasters and Governance = Case Studies of Disasters and Governance

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101831751

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    There are so many case studies about disasters that this paper focuses on an illustrative small sample dealing primarily with two countries, the United States and South Korea. In the United States, a combination of real-world natural disasters and simulated terrorist attacks implied very high levels of business interruption that could justify an overall strategy of significant spending on prevention and mitigation. An equally important point is the risk of top-down governance failures revealed in Hurricane Katrina (2005). The South Korean examples are very different. A long series of typhoons over more than two decades showed some gains in reduced fatalities, although the emergency management system remains imperfect despite a series of legislative actions including the recent Public Safety and Security Act of 2014. Much worse were several man-made disasters reflecting design weaknesses, inadequate prevention, the lack of regulations and inspection, and even corruption. There were many examples including the Sungsoo bridge, the Sampoong store, the Daegu subway, the Sewol ferry, the Pangyo concert, and the nuclear power errors. Two more examples are the Mexico City earthquake of 1985 in which successful bottom-up action by volunteers surprisingly took place in an autocratic society and the Thames Barrier in London, the UK (1996-83) where a “czar” was in complete charge of a very ambitious flood protection project.
    번역하기

    There are so many case studies about disasters that this paper focuses on an illustrative small sample dealing primarily with two countries, the United States and South Korea. In the United States, a combination of real-world natural disasters and sim...

    There are so many case studies about disasters that this paper focuses on an illustrative small sample dealing primarily with two countries, the United States and South Korea. In the United States, a combination of real-world natural disasters and simulated terrorist attacks implied very high levels of business interruption that could justify an overall strategy of significant spending on prevention and mitigation. An equally important point is the risk of top-down governance failures revealed in Hurricane Katrina (2005). The South Korean examples are very different. A long series of typhoons over more than two decades showed some gains in reduced fatalities, although the emergency management system remains imperfect despite a series of legislative actions including the recent Public Safety and Security Act of 2014. Much worse were several man-made disasters reflecting design weaknesses, inadequate prevention, the lack of regulations and inspection, and even corruption. There were many examples including the Sungsoo bridge, the Sampoong store, the Daegu subway, the Sewol ferry, the Pangyo concert, and the nuclear power errors. Two more examples are the Mexico City earthquake of 1985 in which successful bottom-up action by volunteers surprisingly took place in an autocratic society and the Thames Barrier in London, the UK (1996-83) where a “czar” was in complete charge of a very ambitious flood protection project.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Caiden, G. E., "Where Corruption Lives" Kumarian Press 2001

    2 Gordon, P., "Transport-related impacts of the Northridge Earthquake" 1 : 21-36, 1998

    3 Independent Investigation Commission, "The Fukushima Incident"

    4 Ha, K. -M., "Selective versus Comprehensive Emergency Management in Korea" 3 : 602-, 2014

    5 US House of Representatives, "Report on Hurricane Katrina" 2006

    6 Campbell, A. F., "New Orleans’ Post-Katrina Identity Crisis" 20 : 2014

    7 Clay, E. J., "Natural Disaster Analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk Assessment, Economic Impacts and Social Implications" Edward Elgar 230-252, 2008

    8 Clarke, L., "Natural Disaster Analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk Assessment, Economic Impacts and Social Implications" Edward Elgar 84-92, 2008

    9 Richardson, H. W., "Natural Disaster Analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk Assessment, Economic Impacts and Social Implications" Edward Elgar 2008

    10 Richardson, H. W., "Natural Disaster Analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk Assessment, Economic Impacts and Social Implications" Edward Elgar 120-133, 2008

    1 Caiden, G. E., "Where Corruption Lives" Kumarian Press 2001

    2 Gordon, P., "Transport-related impacts of the Northridge Earthquake" 1 : 21-36, 1998

    3 Independent Investigation Commission, "The Fukushima Incident"

    4 Ha, K. -M., "Selective versus Comprehensive Emergency Management in Korea" 3 : 602-, 2014

    5 US House of Representatives, "Report on Hurricane Katrina" 2006

    6 Campbell, A. F., "New Orleans’ Post-Katrina Identity Crisis" 20 : 2014

    7 Clay, E. J., "Natural Disaster Analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk Assessment, Economic Impacts and Social Implications" Edward Elgar 230-252, 2008

    8 Clarke, L., "Natural Disaster Analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk Assessment, Economic Impacts and Social Implications" Edward Elgar 84-92, 2008

    9 Richardson, H. W., "Natural Disaster Analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk Assessment, Economic Impacts and Social Implications" Edward Elgar 2008

    10 Richardson, H. W., "Natural Disaster Analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk Assessment, Economic Impacts and Social Implications" Edward Elgar 120-133, 2008

    11 Logan, J. R., "Natural Disaster Analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk Assessment, Economic Impacts and Social Implications" Edward Elgar 279-297, 2008

    12 Ha, K. -M., "National Emergency Management Systems : The United States and Korea" 6 (6): 31-44, 2008

    13 Blakely, E. J., "My Storm: Managing the Recovery of New Orleans in the Wake of Katrina: The City in the Twenty First Century" University of Pennsylvania Press 2011

    14 Miernyk, W. H., "Impact of the Space Program on a Local Economy: An Input-Output Analysis" West Virginia University Press 1967

    15 Park, J. -Y., "Identifying Regional Economic Impacts of 9/11" 15 : 1-34, 2009

    16 Kim, P. S., "Emergency Management in Korea and its Future Direction" 6 (6): 189-201, 1998

    17 Ha, K. -M., "Emergency Management in Korea : Just Started, but Rapidly Evolving" National Institute for Disaster Prevention, National Emergency Management Agency of Korea 2010

    18 Ha, K. -M., "Developing Voluntary Agencies in Emergency Management : The United States and Korea" 6 (6): 39-50, 2008

    19 Harry W. Richardson, "Conceptual Issues in Disaster and Governance" 성균관대학교 국정관리대학원 9 (9): 15-29, 2014

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-10-23 학회명변경 한글명 : 성균관대학교 국정관리대학원 -> 성균관대학교 국정전문대학원 KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2010-07-02 학회명변경 영문명 : graduate of governance -> graduate school of governance KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.44 0.44 0.4
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.47 0.55 0.645 0.04
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼