RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    모집단 가중치 적용여부에 따른 주택수요 추정결과 비교 및 시사점

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110460563

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines how the application of population weights affects the estimation of housing demand in Korea, employing the household-size–based Mankiw–Weil(M-W) model, a widely used framework in domestic housing demand analysis. Using the Korea Housing Survey data from 2017–2023, we compare weighted and unweighted estimations of the modified M-W model to assess how population weighting alters regression coefficients across periods and regions, and how it influences long-term housing demand. The analysis distinguishes between the Seoul Capital Area and non-capital regions to evaluate regional heterogeneity. Our findings indicate that the Housing Survey tends to under-sample one-person households and over-sample two-person households compared with the Population and Housing Census, suggesting that population weights may be necessary to mitigate sampling bias in estimating the M-W model. Estimation results from the modified model reveal statistically significant differences in regression coefficients between weighted and unweighted specifications in both the capital and non-capital regions, accompanied by substantial discrepancies in projected long-term housing demand. Notably, the omission of population weights appears to lead to an upward bias in long-term demand estimates for non-capital regions relative to the capital region. These results underscore the importance of applying population weights when estimating housing demand from sample survey data. In line with previous evidence, we recommend reporting and comparing both weighted and unweighted estimation results to enhance the accuracy and robustness of model inferences.
    번역하기

    This study examines how the application of population weights affects the estimation of housing demand in Korea, employing the household-size–based Mankiw–Weil(M-W) model, a widely used framework in domestic housing demand analysis. Using the Kore...

    This study examines how the application of population weights affects the estimation of housing demand in Korea, employing the household-size–based Mankiw–Weil(M-W) model, a widely used framework in domestic housing demand analysis. Using the Korea Housing Survey data from 2017–2023, we compare weighted and unweighted estimations of the modified M-W model to assess how population weighting alters regression coefficients across periods and regions, and how it influences long-term housing demand. The analysis distinguishes between the Seoul Capital Area and non-capital regions to evaluate regional heterogeneity. Our findings indicate that the Housing Survey tends to under-sample one-person households and over-sample two-person households compared with the Population and Housing Census, suggesting that population weights may be necessary to mitigate sampling bias in estimating the M-W model. Estimation results from the modified model reveal statistically significant differences in regression coefficients between weighted and unweighted specifications in both the capital and non-capital regions, accompanied by substantial discrepancies in projected long-term housing demand. Notably, the omission of population weights appears to lead to an upward bias in long-term demand estimates for non-capital regions relative to the capital region. These results underscore the importance of applying population weights when estimating housing demand from sample survey data. In line with previous evidence, we recommend reporting and comparing both weighted and unweighted estimation results to enhance the accuracy and robustness of model inferences.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼