RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    사법 : 민법상 유류분의 제도적 의의 -연혁적 고찰을 중심으로- = Significance of the reserve in Civil Law

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76495744

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Mankind will decide at liberty the fate of his property, therefore the inheritee will be dispose of his property. But the free disposition of inheritance by the inheritee will be against to the fixed of relation`s interest in some case. So the restriction of the free principle of inheritee`s intention is required. It is the Reserve System to take charge of such function. The Reserve System is the inheritance system which is established in order to a fixed successor and the inheritee who must reserve a division of successor`s legal portion of an inheritance. Accordingly the Reserve is a fixed property which has leave behind for a the legal heir, when a inheritee disposes of his property by his donation or legacy. Our country did not adopted the Reserve System in the early Civil Code. But It is adopted at 1977 through a partial amendment of the Civil Law Act. The Reserve System in the Civil Law could protect successor who is excluded by the intention of inheritee and also it is a compromise between Will Succession System and Legal Succession System. This thesis dealt with explanation about the History of Reserve as well as legal merit on the Reserve system. On this basis, I tried to mention the distinction of our Reserve System as follows that our present Reserve System in the Civil law seems largely on the basis of Portion of Obligation in Roman Law. And a Reserve is the part of property reverted to each rightful person for a reserve, which is certain part of one`s own legal inheritance. Consequently as a rightful person for a reserve should be a successor and his reserve should be protected by his legal inheritance inseparably. The claim of restoration for a Reserve should be a right of Claim. In conclusion the Reserve is the Merit because in one side the disposal of testament principle of his Intention that he will decide at liberty the fate of the property after his death, in another side Legal Succession System is adopted as Succession of property to the fixed near relation is resonable.
    번역하기

    Mankind will decide at liberty the fate of his property, therefore the inheritee will be dispose of his property. But the free disposition of inheritance by the inheritee will be against to the fixed of relation`s interest in some case. So the restric...

    Mankind will decide at liberty the fate of his property, therefore the inheritee will be dispose of his property. But the free disposition of inheritance by the inheritee will be against to the fixed of relation`s interest in some case. So the restriction of the free principle of inheritee`s intention is required. It is the Reserve System to take charge of such function. The Reserve System is the inheritance system which is established in order to a fixed successor and the inheritee who must reserve a division of successor`s legal portion of an inheritance. Accordingly the Reserve is a fixed property which has leave behind for a the legal heir, when a inheritee disposes of his property by his donation or legacy. Our country did not adopted the Reserve System in the early Civil Code. But It is adopted at 1977 through a partial amendment of the Civil Law Act. The Reserve System in the Civil Law could protect successor who is excluded by the intention of inheritee and also it is a compromise between Will Succession System and Legal Succession System. This thesis dealt with explanation about the History of Reserve as well as legal merit on the Reserve system. On this basis, I tried to mention the distinction of our Reserve System as follows that our present Reserve System in the Civil law seems largely on the basis of Portion of Obligation in Roman Law. And a Reserve is the part of property reverted to each rightful person for a reserve, which is certain part of one`s own legal inheritance. Consequently as a rightful person for a reserve should be a successor and his reserve should be protected by his legal inheritance inseparably. The claim of restoration for a Reserve should be a right of Claim. In conclusion the Reserve is the Merit because in one side the disposal of testament principle of his Intention that he will decide at liberty the fate of the property after his death, in another side Legal Succession System is adopted as Succession of property to the fixed near relation is resonable.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박병호, "한국법제사고" 법문사 1983

    2 박병호, "한국법제사" 한국방송통신대학교 출판부 1986

    3 법원행정처, "친족상속에 관한 구관습" 법원행정처 1985

    4 김용한, "친족상속법" 박영사 2004

    5 김주수, "친족상속법" 법문사 2005

    6 천종숙, "유류분제도에 관한 소고" 7 : 1988

    7 이경희, "유류분제도" 삼지 1995

    8 이태재, "유류분에 관한 소고" 1978

    9 김주수, "유류분" 1978

    10 곽윤직, "상속법" 박영사 2005

    1 박병호, "한국법제사고" 법문사 1983

    2 박병호, "한국법제사" 한국방송통신대학교 출판부 1986

    3 법원행정처, "친족상속에 관한 구관습" 법원행정처 1985

    4 김용한, "친족상속법" 박영사 2004

    5 김주수, "친족상속법" 법문사 2005

    6 천종숙, "유류분제도에 관한 소고" 7 : 1988

    7 이경희, "유류분제도" 삼지 1995

    8 이태재, "유류분에 관한 소고" 1978

    9 김주수, "유류분" 1978

    10 곽윤직, "상속법" 박영사 2005

    11 현승종, "로마법" 박영사 1996

    12 신영호, "공동상속론" 도서출판 나남 1987

    13 현승종, "게르만법" 박영사 2001

    14 米山隆, "遺言と法定相續 - 比較法的․制度史的硏究-" 嵯峨野書院 1980

    15 高木多喜男, "遺留分制度の硏究" 成文堂 1982

    16 船田享二, "ロ-マ法(第4卷)" 岩波書店 1971

    17 Max Kaser, "Römisches Privatrecht 13. Aufl" C.H.Beck 1983

    18 W.W.Buckland, "A Manual of Roman Private Law" Cambridge University Press 1957

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-06-17 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Institute for Legal Studies KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.78 0.78 0.74
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.75 0.76 0.82 0.14
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼