RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      사회적 통합.배제 지표 개발을 위한 연구 - 영구임대아파트 거주자를 중심으로 - = The Development of Social Inclusion.Exclusion Indicators - Focused on the Permanent Rental Apartment Dwellers -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101790319

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study was to develop the indicators for understanding social inclusion exclusion of the dwellers living in permanent rental apartment, and to present a important base about priority order of national housing policy for social inclusion. The ultimate purpose of this study was to provide basic information for the development of permanent rental apartment renewal techniques. The first phase of the study was to review of the social inclusion exclusion indicators mentioned in the literature. The indicators of EU (2001, 2006), KIHASA (2005), and Jehoel-Gijsbers & Brooman (2007), which were applied in many studies about social inclusion, or included various items about dwellers' subjective attitudes, were selected to construct the framework for the study. On the basis of 3 kinds of indicators at the above, the dimensions of social inclusion exclusion were categorized as material deprivation and access to social rights in an economicstructural exclusion view, and social participation and cultural normative accommodations in a socio-cultural exclusion view. And then, the domains of social inclusion exclusion were decided as follows: income, employment, education service, housing, health, family networks and social networks. The detail contents of indicators were adopted from the prior studies as many as possible, and the dwellers' subjective attitudes and housing domains were intensified with reference to UN housing rights and the study of "residents' satisfaction of housing facilities living in permanent rental housing". The developed indicators were modified through the advisory committee that consist of the specialists from the various fields of studies. The final indicators that were overlapped or not able to be measured were eliminated, and added, in a housing domain, the standards of convenient facilities, the management condition, safety, location, crime and etc. in the apartment complex, which were required to complement in the advisory committee.
      번역하기

      This study was to develop the indicators for understanding social inclusion exclusion of the dwellers living in permanent rental apartment, and to present a important base about priority order of national housing policy for social inclusion. The ultim...

      This study was to develop the indicators for understanding social inclusion exclusion of the dwellers living in permanent rental apartment, and to present a important base about priority order of national housing policy for social inclusion. The ultimate purpose of this study was to provide basic information for the development of permanent rental apartment renewal techniques. The first phase of the study was to review of the social inclusion exclusion indicators mentioned in the literature. The indicators of EU (2001, 2006), KIHASA (2005), and Jehoel-Gijsbers & Brooman (2007), which were applied in many studies about social inclusion, or included various items about dwellers' subjective attitudes, were selected to construct the framework for the study. On the basis of 3 kinds of indicators at the above, the dimensions of social inclusion exclusion were categorized as material deprivation and access to social rights in an economicstructural exclusion view, and social participation and cultural normative accommodations in a socio-cultural exclusion view. And then, the domains of social inclusion exclusion were decided as follows: income, employment, education service, housing, health, family networks and social networks. The detail contents of indicators were adopted from the prior studies as many as possible, and the dwellers' subjective attitudes and housing domains were intensified with reference to UN housing rights and the study of "residents' satisfaction of housing facilities living in permanent rental housing". The developed indicators were modified through the advisory committee that consist of the specialists from the various fields of studies. The final indicators that were overlapped or not able to be measured were eliminated, and added, in a housing domain, the standards of convenient facilities, the management condition, safety, location, crime and etc. in the apartment complex, which were required to complement in the advisory committee.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 하성규, "한국인의 주거 빈곤과 공공주택" 집문당. 2005

      2 이종오, "한국의 사회정책 모델연구: 사회통합의 과제를 중심으로"

      3 신명호, "한국사회의 새로운 빈곤 혹은 사회적 배제" 160-170, 2004

      4 한국주거학회, "주거복지론" 교문사 2007

      5 신운경, "주거단지의 사회통합을 위한 해외 건축계획 사례 연구" 대한건축학회 24 (24): 13-22, 2008

      6 국토연구원, "정기적 주거실태조사 체계 마련을 위한연구"

      7 김준형, "임대주택 사회적 혼합의 장애요인과 해소방안에 관한 연구" 대한국토·도시계획학회 40 (40): 153-163, 2005

      8 홍인옥, "영구임대주택 주거실태조사"

      9 윤진오, "선진국의 빈부격차와 차별시정을 위한 국가행동계획 사례연구"

      10 김주진, "사회통합을 고려한 임대주택정책 및 개발사례의 특성 연구" 대한국토·도시계획학회 40 (40): 159-176, 2005

      1 하성규, "한국인의 주거 빈곤과 공공주택" 집문당. 2005

      2 이종오, "한국의 사회정책 모델연구: 사회통합의 과제를 중심으로"

      3 신명호, "한국사회의 새로운 빈곤 혹은 사회적 배제" 160-170, 2004

      4 한국주거학회, "주거복지론" 교문사 2007

      5 신운경, "주거단지의 사회통합을 위한 해외 건축계획 사례 연구" 대한건축학회 24 (24): 13-22, 2008

      6 국토연구원, "정기적 주거실태조사 체계 마련을 위한연구"

      7 김준형, "임대주택 사회적 혼합의 장애요인과 해소방안에 관한 연구" 대한국토·도시계획학회 40 (40): 153-163, 2005

      8 홍인옥, "영구임대주택 주거실태조사"

      9 윤진오, "선진국의 빈부격차와 차별시정을 위한 국가행동계획 사례연구"

      10 김주진, "사회통합을 고려한 임대주택정책 및 개발사례의 특성 연구" 대한국토·도시계획학회 40 (40): 159-176, 2005

      11 정성기, "사회적 혼합이 전제된 공동주택 평형혼합 방법에 관한 연구" 전남대학교 2001

      12 강신욱, "사회적 배제의 지표개발 및 적용방안 연구"

      13 신명호, "사회적 배제의 관점에서 본 빈곤층의 실태연구"

      14 배순석, "도시 주거공간의 사회통합 실현방안 연구"

      15 대한주택공사, "다가구 매입 임대사업의 평가 및 확대방안" 2005

      16 서수정, "국민임대주택의 사회통합적 계획방안 연구"

      17 신명호, "경제·사회·문화적 권리 국가인권정책기본계획 수립을위한 주거권 기초현황조사"

      18 Sarkissian, "The Idea of Social Mix in Town" 13 (13): 1976

      19 José Luis Machinea, "Measuring and evaluating social cohesion:a preliminary perspective, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), “Social Cohesion. Inclusion and a sense of belonging in Latin America and the Caribbean”"

      20 Atkinson, A.B, "Indicators and Targets for Social Inclusion in the European Union" 42 (42): 47-75, 2004

      21 Craig Johnson, "Housing Policy and Social"

      22 Gerda Jehoel-Gijsbers, "Explaining Social Exclusion" The Netherlands Institute for Social Research. 2007

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.52 0.52 0.51
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.54 0.53 0.797 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼