The debates on the xuanji yuheng 璿璣玉衡 of the late Joseon dynasty had two different lines. The first was to regard it as an astronomical instrument, namely the armillary sphere (渾天儀), and to concentrate on analyzing its detailed structure...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103989347
2004
-
KCI등재후보
학술저널
247-273(27쪽)
6
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The debates on the xuanji yuheng 璿璣玉衡 of the late Joseon dynasty had two different lines. The first was to regard it as an astronomical instrument, namely the armillary sphere (渾天儀), and to concentrate on analyzing its detailed structure...
The debates on the xuanji yuheng 璿璣玉衡 of the late Joseon dynasty had two different lines. The first was to regard it as an astronomical instrument, namely the armillary sphere (渾天儀), and to concentrate on analyzing its detailed structure. This line of the study again can be divided into two. The one was to restore the original instrument utilizing Zhu Xi's commentary. The other was to build a new kind of observational instruments based on Western astronomy that had been introduced in the late Joseon dynasty. The second line of discussion on the xuanji yuheng however denied the idea of the xuanji yuheng as an astronomical instrument. This once again can be splitted into two separate trends. The one was to adopt and to expand the traditional concept of the xuanji yuheng as the Ursa Major (北斗七星). The other proposed new interpretations. The doctrines and the annotations of Confucian canons were questioned and totally new views were presented. This last line reflected an intellectual change in the late Joseon dynasty.
서구 지리학에 대한 동아시아 세계지리 전통의 반응: 17-18세기 중국과 조선의 경우
19세기 조선 수학의 지적 풍토: 홍길주(1786-1841)의 수학과 그 연원
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-29 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : HANGUK KWAHAK-SA HAKHOE-JI -> The Korean Journal for the History of Science | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.46 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.697 | 0.13 |