RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

    Multidisciplinary perspectives on newly revised 2018 FIGO staging of cancer of the cervix uteri

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106052196

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recent developments in imaging technology, radiotherapeutic approaches, biological target therapy, and increased use of minimally invasive surgery have drastically changed the paradigm for management of women with cervical cancer. Until now, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system was based primarily on clinical examination with limited additional diagnostic procedures allowed by the FIGO staging system. In 2018, the prior 2014 FIGO staging system was revised to incorporate imaging and pathological findings, when available, into the new staging system (Table 1) [1]. Multidisciplinary perspectives on newly revised 2018 FIGO staging of cancer of the cervix uteri are discussed by gynecologic oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and epidemiologists in this manuscript (Table 2).
    번역하기

    Recent developments in imaging technology, radiotherapeutic approaches, biological target therapy, and increased use of minimally invasive surgery have drastically changed the paradigm for management of women with cervical cancer. Until now, the Inter...

    Recent developments in imaging technology, radiotherapeutic approaches, biological target therapy, and increased use of minimally invasive surgery have drastically changed the paradigm for management of women with cervical cancer. Until now, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system was based primarily on clinical examination with limited additional diagnostic procedures allowed by the FIGO staging system. In 2018, the prior 2014 FIGO staging system was revised to incorporate imaging and pathological findings, when available, into the new staging system (Table 1) [1]. Multidisciplinary perspectives on newly revised 2018 FIGO staging of cancer of the cervix uteri are discussed by gynecologic oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and epidemiologists in this manuscript (Table 2).

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Matsuo K, "Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system" 2018

    2 Amendola MA, "Utilization of diagnostic studies in the pretreatment evaluation of invasive cervical cancer in the United States : results of intergroup protocol ACRIN 6651/GOG 183" 23 : 7454-7459, 2005

    3 Atri M, "Utility of PET-CT to evaluate retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis in advanced cervical cancer : results of ACRIN6671/GOG0233 trial" 142 : 413-419, 2016

    4 Harvey M, "The size of the cervix and its relationship with age and parity" 29 : 171-174, 2016

    5 Chen T, "Survival of cervical cancer patients in Germany in the early 21st century : a period analysis by age, histology, and stage" 51 : 915-921, 2012

    6 Melamed A, "Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer" 379 : 1905-1914, 2018

    7 Balleyguier C, "Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI : guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology" 21 : 1102-1110, 2011

    8 Landoni F, "Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib–IIa cervical cancer" 350 : 535-540, 1997

    9 Nishio S, "Race and nodal disease status are prognostic factors in patients with stage IVB cervical cancer" 9 : 32321-32330, 2018

    10 Sarker A, "Prognostic implications of the SUVmax of primary tumors and metastatic lymph node measured by 18F-FDG PET in patients with uterine cervical cancer : a meta-analysis" 41 : 34-40, 2016

    1 Matsuo K, "Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system" 2018

    2 Amendola MA, "Utilization of diagnostic studies in the pretreatment evaluation of invasive cervical cancer in the United States : results of intergroup protocol ACRIN 6651/GOG 183" 23 : 7454-7459, 2005

    3 Atri M, "Utility of PET-CT to evaluate retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis in advanced cervical cancer : results of ACRIN6671/GOG0233 trial" 142 : 413-419, 2016

    4 Harvey M, "The size of the cervix and its relationship with age and parity" 29 : 171-174, 2016

    5 Chen T, "Survival of cervical cancer patients in Germany in the early 21st century : a period analysis by age, histology, and stage" 51 : 915-921, 2012

    6 Melamed A, "Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer" 379 : 1905-1914, 2018

    7 Balleyguier C, "Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI : guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology" 21 : 1102-1110, 2011

    8 Landoni F, "Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib–IIa cervical cancer" 350 : 535-540, 1997

    9 Nishio S, "Race and nodal disease status are prognostic factors in patients with stage IVB cervical cancer" 9 : 32321-32330, 2018

    10 Sarker A, "Prognostic implications of the SUVmax of primary tumors and metastatic lymph node measured by 18F-FDG PET in patients with uterine cervical cancer : a meta-analysis" 41 : 34-40, 2016

    11 Zighelboim I, "Outcomes in 24 selected patients with stage IVB cervical cancer and excellent performance status treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy" 24 : 625-630, 2006

    12 Ramirez PT, "Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer" 379 : 1895-1904, 2018

    13 Pandharipande PV, "MRI and PET/CT for triaging stage IB clinically operable cervical cancer to appropriate therapy : decision analysis to assess patient outcomes" 192 : 802-814, 2009

    14 Grigsby PW, "Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in patients with carcinoma of the cervix" 19 : 3745-3749, 2001

    15 Kidd EA, "Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in cervical cancer : relationship to prognosis" 28 : 2108-2113, 2010

    16 Gee MS, "Identification of distant metastatic disease in uterine cervical and endometrial cancers with FDG PET/CT : analysis from the ACRIN 6671/GOG 0233 multicenter trial" 287 : 176-184, 2018

    17 Bray F, "Global cancer statistics 2018 : GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries" 68 : 394-424, 2018

    18 FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology, "FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and corpus uteri" 125 : 97-98, 2014

    19 Bhatla N, "FIGO cancer report 2018" 143 (143): 2-3, 2018

    20 Xiyi Jiang, "Epidemiology of gynecologic cancers in China" 대한부인종양학회 29 (29): 1-7, 2018

    21 Epstein E, "Early-stage cervical cancer : tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound-a European multicenter trial" 128 : 449-453, 2013

    22 Mitchell DG, "Early invasive cervical cancer : tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 intergroup study" 24 : 5687-5694, 2006

    23 Choi HJ, "Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis" 101 : 1471-1479, 2010

    24 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, "Cervical cancer"

    25 Bhatla N, "Cancer of the cervix uteri" 143 (143): 22-36, 2018

    26 Ferlay J, "Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe : estimates for 40 countries in 2012" 49 : 1374-1403, 2013

    27 Siegel CL, "ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pretreatment planning of invasive cancer of the cervix" 9 : 395-402, 2012

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2012-07-13 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한부인종양콜포스코피학회 -> 대한부인종양학회
    영문명 : Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy -> Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
    KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-06-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 부인종양 -> Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
    외국어명 : Korean Journal of Gynecologic Oncology -> Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
    KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-09-13 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한부인종양.콜포스코피학회지 -> 부인종양
    외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
    KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.18 0.12 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.13 0.9 0.732 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼