RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    탈식민의 목소리: <다호메이>의 언어⋅ 음성⋅ 서술 = Decolonial Voices: Language, Voice, and Narration in Dahomey

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110206077

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article analyzes Mati Diop's documentary Dahomey (2024) and examines how the question of African cultural restitution—centered on the 2021 transfer of twenty-six royal treasures from France to Benin—is configured in the film through the forms of language, voice, and narration. Chapter 2, drawing on postcolonial theory (notably Frantz Fanon), argues that the film does not simply represent restitution as an institutional procedure but frames it as a confrontation between a dominant order and the conditions of speech. Chapter 3 mobilizes Michel Chion's concepts of the acousmêtre and de-acousmatization to show that the voice of King Ghézo (“No. 26”) remains not fully bound to a visible body, generating an aural tension that contrasts the museum regime—operating through numbering, cataloguing, and sealing—with the ritual status of African sculpture. Chapter 4, referring to Gérard Genette's narratology, demonstrates that this voice functions as a narrative voice organizing the film as a whole and produces the affective logic of accented cinema.
    번역하기

    This article analyzes Mati Diop's documentary Dahomey (2024) and examines how the question of African cultural restitution—centered on the 2021 transfer of twenty-six royal treasures from France to Benin—is configured in the film through the forms...

    This article analyzes Mati Diop's documentary Dahomey (2024) and examines how the question of African cultural restitution—centered on the 2021 transfer of twenty-six royal treasures from France to Benin—is configured in the film through the forms of language, voice, and narration. Chapter 2, drawing on postcolonial theory (notably Frantz Fanon), argues that the film does not simply represent restitution as an institutional procedure but frames it as a confrontation between a dominant order and the conditions of speech. Chapter 3 mobilizes Michel Chion's concepts of the acousmêtre and de-acousmatization to show that the voice of King Ghézo (“No. 26”) remains not fully bound to a visible body, generating an aural tension that contrasts the museum regime—operating through numbering, cataloguing, and sealing—with the ritual status of African sculpture. Chapter 4, referring to Gérard Genette's narratology, demonstrates that this voice functions as a narrative voice organizing the film as a whole and produces the affective logic of accented cinema.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼