RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    점령지의 영화와 검열 장(場)의 구조: 스크린을 둘러싼 제도, 담론, 실천의 변곡점들 = Film in Occupied Theater and the Structure of Its Censorial Field: Inflection Points in Institutions, Discourses, and Practices Surrounding the Screen

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110206075

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aims to construct film screening lists from the immediate post-liberation period under the US Military Government and cross-analyze them with archival materials to trace the transformation of institutions, discourses, and practices surrounding screens in the occupied territory, thereby redefining the nature of USAMGIK film policy. Existing film historiography has characterized the US Military Government's policy - spearheaded by the Central Motion Picture Exchange (CMPE) - as a cultural imperialist project aimed at market domination through Hollywood's film offensive. However, this study's empirical analysis demonstrates that, while the US Military Government initially advocated the abolition of prior censorship and espoused liberal principles, it faced a severe vacuum in psychological warfare owing to the absence of substantial reorientation programs and the undersupply of Hollywood films. By contrast, the Soviet Union strategically distributed war films through its consulate that promoted its image as a liberating force, thereby establishing cultural hegemony in the liberated space. Against this backdrop, this study reveals that the coercive theater control and censorship revival embodied in ‘Ordinance No. 68’ and ‘No. 115’ constituted paradoxically not a response to film oversupply but rather precipitous defensive measures arising from structural deficit. Unable to secure cultural consent through film abundance, the US Military Government imposed draconian institutional controls to forestall the appropriation of theaters as leftist propaganda venues. In sum, USAMGIK film policy was less a coherent project of cultural colonization than a defensive and contingent mechanism deployed to navigate the ideological battlefield amid Cold War geopolitical flux and material scarcity.
    번역하기

    This study aims to construct film screening lists from the immediate post-liberation period under the US Military Government and cross-analyze them with archival materials to trace the transformation of institutions, discourses, and practices surround...

    This study aims to construct film screening lists from the immediate post-liberation period under the US Military Government and cross-analyze them with archival materials to trace the transformation of institutions, discourses, and practices surrounding screens in the occupied territory, thereby redefining the nature of USAMGIK film policy. Existing film historiography has characterized the US Military Government's policy - spearheaded by the Central Motion Picture Exchange (CMPE) - as a cultural imperialist project aimed at market domination through Hollywood's film offensive. However, this study's empirical analysis demonstrates that, while the US Military Government initially advocated the abolition of prior censorship and espoused liberal principles, it faced a severe vacuum in psychological warfare owing to the absence of substantial reorientation programs and the undersupply of Hollywood films. By contrast, the Soviet Union strategically distributed war films through its consulate that promoted its image as a liberating force, thereby establishing cultural hegemony in the liberated space. Against this backdrop, this study reveals that the coercive theater control and censorship revival embodied in ‘Ordinance No. 68’ and ‘No. 115’ constituted paradoxically not a response to film oversupply but rather precipitous defensive measures arising from structural deficit. Unable to secure cultural consent through film abundance, the US Military Government imposed draconian institutional controls to forestall the appropriation of theaters as leftist propaganda venues. In sum, USAMGIK film policy was less a coherent project of cultural colonization than a defensive and contingent mechanism deployed to navigate the ideological battlefield amid Cold War geopolitical flux and material scarcity.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼