RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    도시민의 생활양식과 삶의 질(QOL)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99967454

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The following research reconsiders the lifestyle concept in sociological tradition and theoretically reconstructs a conceptual framework to analyze the relationship between the lifestyle and the quality of life (QOL). It’s purpose is to explore group QOL differences resulting from lifestyle differences of urban residents. Through this research, the theoretical significance of lifestyle concept, which has been overlooked in the national research of quality of life for some time, can be emphasized. While also making suggestions on policy implications that should be considered in the study of QOL. First, it can be confirmed that while objective conditions are significant in the research on urban QOL, subjective perceptions cannot be ignored as major variables. Second, although social stratification factors remain an important variable in causing QOL differences among urban residents, regional variables, which were long overlooked, must also be considered a significant factor. Third, among lifestyles related to QOL, leisure was found to have the most effect ? active leisure activities in particular show a tighter relationship with QOL than passive attitudes. Fourth, the relation between participative lifestyle - considered an action towards self-realization ? and QOL can also be confirmed. An eco-friendly practice that sacrifices convenience, rather than a lifestyle that pursues it, shows a more significant QOL relation.
    번역하기

    The following research reconsiders the lifestyle concept in sociological tradition and theoretically reconstructs a conceptual framework to analyze the relationship between the lifestyle and the quality of life (QOL). It’s purpose is to explore grou...

    The following research reconsiders the lifestyle concept in sociological tradition and theoretically reconstructs a conceptual framework to analyze the relationship between the lifestyle and the quality of life (QOL). It’s purpose is to explore group QOL differences resulting from lifestyle differences of urban residents. Through this research, the theoretical significance of lifestyle concept, which has been overlooked in the national research of quality of life for some time, can be emphasized. While also making suggestions on policy implications that should be considered in the study of QOL. First, it can be confirmed that while objective conditions are significant in the research on urban QOL, subjective perceptions cannot be ignored as major variables. Second, although social stratification factors remain an important variable in causing QOL differences among urban residents, regional variables, which were long overlooked, must also be considered a significant factor. Third, among lifestyles related to QOL, leisure was found to have the most effect ? active leisure activities in particular show a tighter relationship with QOL than passive attitudes. Fourth, the relation between participative lifestyle - considered an action towards self-realization ? and QOL can also be confirmed. An eco-friendly practice that sacrifices convenience, rather than a lifestyle that pursues it, shows a more significant QOL relation.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이미숙, "한국 성인의 건강불평등:사회계층과 지역 차이를 중심으로" 한국사회학회 39 (39): 183-209, 2005

    2 정건섭, "통계적 방법을 이용한 기초지방단체의 지역주민들에 대한 삶의 질 만족도 분석" 13 (13): 11-144, 2006

    3 문태영, "직장인의 인구통계학적 특성에 따른 생활양식과 생활만족도 관계" 한국스포츠리서치 14 (14): 865-876, 2003

    4 이영균, "지역주민의 삶의 질에 관한 연구" 한국정책과학학회 11 (11): 223-250, 2007

    5 김대희, "지역사회의 건강증진 생활양식 요인에 관한 연구" 27 (27): 250-259, 2001

    6 김영정, "정보화와 도시생활양식의 변모 - 신화와 현실" 26 : 39-56, 2000

    7 이명진, "정보기술 활용정도에 따른 생활양식의 차이" 4 : 121-146, 2002

    8 정선기, "소유자본의 유형과 생활양식: 광역대도시 주민의 가치지향과 행위양식을 중심으로" 사회과학연구소 22 (22): 3-27, 2011

    9 유춘희, "생활양식의 변화에 따른 현대인의 영양문제"

    10 소진광, "삶의 질 개념과 도시정책적 함의" 23 (23): 65-84, 1998

    1 이미숙, "한국 성인의 건강불평등:사회계층과 지역 차이를 중심으로" 한국사회학회 39 (39): 183-209, 2005

    2 정건섭, "통계적 방법을 이용한 기초지방단체의 지역주민들에 대한 삶의 질 만족도 분석" 13 (13): 11-144, 2006

    3 문태영, "직장인의 인구통계학적 특성에 따른 생활양식과 생활만족도 관계" 한국스포츠리서치 14 (14): 865-876, 2003

    4 이영균, "지역주민의 삶의 질에 관한 연구" 한국정책과학학회 11 (11): 223-250, 2007

    5 김대희, "지역사회의 건강증진 생활양식 요인에 관한 연구" 27 (27): 250-259, 2001

    6 김영정, "정보화와 도시생활양식의 변모 - 신화와 현실" 26 : 39-56, 2000

    7 이명진, "정보기술 활용정도에 따른 생활양식의 차이" 4 : 121-146, 2002

    8 정선기, "소유자본의 유형과 생활양식: 광역대도시 주민의 가치지향과 행위양식을 중심으로" 사회과학연구소 22 (22): 3-27, 2011

    9 유춘희, "생활양식의 변화에 따른 현대인의 영양문제"

    10 소진광, "삶의 질 개념과 도시정책적 함의" 23 (23): 65-84, 1998

    11 송인성, "도시의 삶의 질 제고방안에 관한 연구 -광주시와 벤쿠버시를 사례로-" 한국지역개발학회 16 (16): 107-140, 2004

    12 윤경아, "도시 노숙자의 삶의 질 예측요인" 한국사회복지학회 57 (57): 219-243, 2005

    13 김경호, "노인의 스포츠 참여와 건강증진 생활양식의 관계" 한국스포츠리서치 15 (15): 339-350, 2004

    14 손덕옥, "노인의 건강증진 생활양식에 관한 연구" 한국보건사회학회 11 (11): 137-159, 2002

    15 이은우, "개별가구 자료에 의한 지역간 삶의 질 차이 분석" 6 (6): 223-250, 1997

    16 홍연경, "가족의 건강생활양식과 건강상태 분석연구" 10 (10): 351-356, 2000

    17 Veenhoven, Ruut, "Why Social Policy needs Subjective Indicators" 58 : 33-45, 2002

    18 이종렬, "WHOQOL-Bref를 이용한 대구시민의 삶의 질" 10 (10): 129-154, 2000

    19 The WHOQOL Group, "WHOQOL Study: Australian WHOQOL-100, WHOQOL-BREF and CA-WHOQOL Instruments: User's Manual and Interpretation Guide"

    20 Bonomi, Amy E., "Validation of the United States' version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life(WHOQOL) instrument" 53 : 1-12, 2000

    21 Bramston, Paul, "Unravelling Subjective Quality of Life:An Investgation of Individual and Community Determinants" 59 : 79-114, 2002

    22 The WHOQOL Group, "The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment(WHOQOL):Development and General Psychometric Properties" 12 : 1569-1585, 1998

    23 Cockerham, William C., "The Sociocultural Context of Sport and Health: Problems of Causal Relations and Structural Interdependence" 13 (13): 197-213, 1996

    24 Wong, Cecilia, "The Relationship between Quality of Life and Local Economic Development:An Empirical Study of Local Authority Areas in England" 18 (18): 25-31, 2001

    25 Lucas-Carrasco, "Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF and WHOQOL-OLD for Spanish older adults" 15 (15): 595-604, 2011

    26 Evans, Sherrill, "Studies of Quality of Life in the General Population" 14 : 204-211, 2002

    27 Delhey, Jan, "Quality of Life in a European Perspective: The Euromodule as a New Instrument for Comparative Welfare Research" 58 : 163-172, 2002

    28 Shin, Doh Chull, "Quality of Life in Korea:Comparative and Dynamic Perspectives" 62 : 3-16, 2003

    29 Petrucci, Alessandra, "Quality of Life in Europe: Objective and Subjective Indicators - A Spatial Analysis Using Classification Techniques" 60 : 55-88, 2002

    30 Seik, Foo Tuan, "Quality of Life in Cities" 18 (18): 1-2, 2001

    31 Rogerson, Robert J., "Quality of Life and City Competitiveness" 36 : 969-985, 1999

    32 Collinge, Abigail, "Quality of Life Assessment in Non-Western Cultures" 14 : 212-218, 2002

    33 Lloyd, Kathy, "Planning for Leisure: Issues of Quality of Life" 15 (15): 1996

    34 Simmel, Georg, "Philosophie des Geldes" Main 1989

    35 Diener, "Personality, Culture, and Subjective Well-bing: Emotional and Cognitive Evaluation of Life" 54 : 403-425, 2003

    36 Lee, Hyun Song, "Objective Quality of Life in Korea and the OECD Countries" 62 : 481-508, 2003

    37 Greenley, James R., "Mesuring Quality of Life: A New and Practical Survey Instrument" 42 : 1997

    38 Lawton, M. Powell, "Mesures of Quality of Life and Subjective Well-bing" 21 (21): 1997

    39 Cockerham, William C., "Max Weber, Formal Rationality, and Health Lifestyles" 34 (34): 413-425, 1993

    40 Abel, Thomas, "Lifestyle or Lebensführung? Critical Remarks on the Mistranslation of Weber's 'Class, Status, Party" 34 (34): 551-556, 1993

    41 Zapf, Wolfgang, "Individualisierung und Sicherheit - Untersuchung zur Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland" München 1987

    42 Sirgy, M. Joseph, "How Neighbourhood Features affect Quality of Life" 59 : 79-114, 2002

    43 Cockerham, William C., "Health lifestyle theory in an Asian context" 15 (15): 5-15, 2006

    44 Cockerham, William C., "Health Lifestyle Theory and Convergence of Agency and Structure" 46 : 51-67, 2005

    45 Edgerton, Jason D., "Handbook of Social Indicators and Quality of Life Research" 265-296, 2012

    46 Land, Kenneth C., "Handbook of Social Indicators and Quality of Life Research" 1-22, 2012

    47 Weber, Max, "Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Soziologie und Sozialpolitik" Tübingen 1988

    48 Bourdieu, Pierre, "Die feinen Unterschiede - Kritik der gesellschaftlichen Urteilskraft" Main 1982

    49 Maycroft, N., "Cultural consumption and the myth of life-style" 84 : 61-75, 2004

    50 Berger-Schmitt, Regina, "Considering Social Cohesion in Quality of Life Assessments:Concept and Mesurment" 58 : 403-428, 2002

    51 Johansson, Sten, "Conceptualizing and Measuring Quality of Life for National Policy: From the Swedish Level of Living Survey to an Epistemology of the Democratic Process" 58 : 13-32, 2002

    52 Cockerham, William C., "Conceptualizing Contemporary Health Lifestyles: Moving Beyond Weber" 38 (38): 321-338, 1997

    53 Cassidy, K., "Association between lifestyle factors and mental health measures among community-dwelling older women. Australian and New Zealand" 38 : 940-947, 2004

    54 Hattie, John A., "A Factor Structure of Wellness: Theory, Assessment, Analysis, and Practice" 82 : 354-364, 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.18 1.18 1.2
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.23 1.17 1.625 0.41
    더보기
    해외이동버튼