RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      이종성 박사의 섭리론과 예정론에 대한 이해 = Dr. Jong-Sung Lee`s Understanding of Providence and Predestination

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100825567

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this article is to show and to organize characters of Dr. Jongsung Lee``s ``the Doctrine of providence`` and ``the Doctrine of predestination.`` The doctrine of providence was an important issue in his doctrine of God. He tried to reveal God``s absolute sovereignty and Grace``s absoluteness through the doctrine of providence. In comparison, his doctrine of predestination played a subsidiary role as emphasizing on God``s sovereignty and on being God as Creator. I believe that his doctrine of providence and predestination was based on the Creator God. Because he insisted that Creator God uses ``predestination`` and ``providence`` for achieving His purpose. The providence of Creator God has an intention of universal sovereignty and salvation. And he highlighted a reformed spirit as ``soli Deo gloria.`` There are some noteworthy features in his doctrine of providence and of predestination. First, Dr. Lee ranged over ``the relation between the God``s will and man``s free will`` which is one of the traditional questions. He tried to overcome confrontation between Calvinism as focusing on Absolute sovereignty and Wesleyanism stressing man``s will. But he did not give a new answer. His explanation repeated Calvinists`` understanding. Second, he mentioned universalism which is an issue that has been debated over long time and made a positive evaluation of it. He told that the reformed church``s tradition has been the particularism. But he concluded that the tradition is the universalism, when we read the Bible in a creation-theological aspect. Third, Dr. Lee focused on predestination``s ethical aspect. He believed that the doctrine of predestination and the ethic are complementary. However, an influence of his predestination was reduced than Augustine``s, Calvin``s and Barth``s, though he respected them as standards of theology. His predestination became an assistant theory for supporting the doctrine of providence. The ecclesiological understanding of predestination as ``the church as the elect of God`` was shown in the above mentioned three theologians, but is not shown in him. The relation between Christ and predestination-electio in Christo -was shown in the theology of reformers and Barth. But it is not shown in his, too. It showed that Dr. Lee, Jong-sung put the doctrine of providence in the center of his theology instead of the doctrine of predestination.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this article is to show and to organize characters of Dr. Jongsung Lee``s ``the Doctrine of providence`` and ``the Doctrine of predestination.`` The doctrine of providence was an important issue in his doctrine of God. He tried to revea...

      The purpose of this article is to show and to organize characters of Dr. Jongsung Lee``s ``the Doctrine of providence`` and ``the Doctrine of predestination.`` The doctrine of providence was an important issue in his doctrine of God. He tried to reveal God``s absolute sovereignty and Grace``s absoluteness through the doctrine of providence. In comparison, his doctrine of predestination played a subsidiary role as emphasizing on God``s sovereignty and on being God as Creator. I believe that his doctrine of providence and predestination was based on the Creator God. Because he insisted that Creator God uses ``predestination`` and ``providence`` for achieving His purpose. The providence of Creator God has an intention of universal sovereignty and salvation. And he highlighted a reformed spirit as ``soli Deo gloria.`` There are some noteworthy features in his doctrine of providence and of predestination. First, Dr. Lee ranged over ``the relation between the God``s will and man``s free will`` which is one of the traditional questions. He tried to overcome confrontation between Calvinism as focusing on Absolute sovereignty and Wesleyanism stressing man``s will. But he did not give a new answer. His explanation repeated Calvinists`` understanding. Second, he mentioned universalism which is an issue that has been debated over long time and made a positive evaluation of it. He told that the reformed church``s tradition has been the particularism. But he concluded that the tradition is the universalism, when we read the Bible in a creation-theological aspect. Third, Dr. Lee focused on predestination``s ethical aspect. He believed that the doctrine of predestination and the ethic are complementary. However, an influence of his predestination was reduced than Augustine``s, Calvin``s and Barth``s, though he respected them as standards of theology. His predestination became an assistant theory for supporting the doctrine of providence. The ecclesiological understanding of predestination as ``the church as the elect of God`` was shown in the above mentioned three theologians, but is not shown in him. The relation between Christ and predestination-electio in Christo -was shown in the theology of reformers and Barth. But it is not shown in his, too. It showed that Dr. Lee, Jong-sung put the doctrine of providence in the center of his theology instead of the doctrine of predestination.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼