RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    A Study on the Development for the System of Evaluating Local Governments = Focusing on the Impact of Evaluation Factors on Evaluation Acceptance

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106045104

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    I conducted this study to improve the system of evaluating local governments so as to enhance evaluation acceptance by local governments (ratees). That is, by reviewing theories and previous studies regarding evaluation and evaluation acceptance, I derived an analytical framework to analyze the system of evaluating local governments. I decided on CELG (Combined Evaluation of Local Governments) as an example of a system of evaluating local governments, and conducted surveys and in-depth interviews according to the framework.As a result of statistical analysis, the evaluation acceptance of local governments (ratees) is positively correlated to 'Evaluation Methods', 'Evaluation Results', and 'Stakeholders' with statistical significance. Over 50% of responses from local governments (ratees) in the subjective questionnaires were about 'Evaluation Indicators', and evaluation professionals emphasized communication among stakeholders regarding evaluation indicators. This paper stresses the need for interest in evaluation indicators and calls for further research on evaluation contexts.
    번역하기

    I conducted this study to improve the system of evaluating local governments so as to enhance evaluation acceptance by local governments (ratees). That is, by reviewing theories and previous studies regarding evaluation and evaluation acceptance, I de...

    I conducted this study to improve the system of evaluating local governments so as to enhance evaluation acceptance by local governments (ratees). That is, by reviewing theories and previous studies regarding evaluation and evaluation acceptance, I derived an analytical framework to analyze the system of evaluating local governments. I decided on CELG (Combined Evaluation of Local Governments) as an example of a system of evaluating local governments, and conducted surveys and in-depth interviews according to the framework.As a result of statistical analysis, the evaluation acceptance of local governments (ratees) is positively correlated to 'Evaluation Methods', 'Evaluation Results', and 'Stakeholders' with statistical significance. Over 50% of responses from local governments (ratees) in the subjective questionnaires were about 'Evaluation Indicators', and evaluation professionals emphasized communication among stakeholders regarding evaluation indicators. This paper stresses the need for interest in evaluation indicators and calls for further research on evaluation contexts.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박우서, "현행 합동평가제도의 개선방안" 사회과학연구소 36 : 47-72, 2005

    2 고성철, "합동평가 시책 및 대상과제의 대표성 확보에 관한 연구" 한국정책분석평가학회 15 (15): 213-239, 2005

    3 라휘문, "지방행정 혁신평가결과의 수용도에 대한 영향요인 분석" 한국지방행정연구원 21 (21): 199-224, 2007

    4 류영아, "지방자치단체 합동평가에 대한 지방공무원의 인식 비교연구" 한국지방정부학회 16 (16): 291-308, 2012

    5 류영아, "지방자치단체 메타평가 제도 정착의 영향요인: 중앙과 지방공무원의 인식을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 43 (43): 97-119, 2009

    6 김현구, "정부업무평가 기본법의 논리와 과제: 평가성공의 제도적 요인 분석" 한국정책분석평가학회 16 (16): 1-28, 2006

    7 이석환, "성과평가제도의 수용성에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구: 평가체계요인과 내부동기요인을 중심으로" 서울행정학회 20 (20): 269-291, 2010

    8 김민영, "성과평가제도 수용성의 선행 및 결과요인에 관한 연구:한국 NGO를 중심으로" 한국정책분석평가학회 23 (23): 87-125, 2013

    9 김범규, "기관평가지표 및 외형적 특성이 연구기관평가 결과 수용성에 미치는 영향" 금융지식연구소 11 (11): 183-202, 2013

    10 김현구, "광역자치단체 합동평가체제의 실증분석" 한국정책분석평가학회 13 (13): 125-148, 2003

    1 박우서, "현행 합동평가제도의 개선방안" 사회과학연구소 36 : 47-72, 2005

    2 고성철, "합동평가 시책 및 대상과제의 대표성 확보에 관한 연구" 한국정책분석평가학회 15 (15): 213-239, 2005

    3 라휘문, "지방행정 혁신평가결과의 수용도에 대한 영향요인 분석" 한국지방행정연구원 21 (21): 199-224, 2007

    4 류영아, "지방자치단체 합동평가에 대한 지방공무원의 인식 비교연구" 한국지방정부학회 16 (16): 291-308, 2012

    5 류영아, "지방자치단체 메타평가 제도 정착의 영향요인: 중앙과 지방공무원의 인식을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 43 (43): 97-119, 2009

    6 김현구, "정부업무평가 기본법의 논리와 과제: 평가성공의 제도적 요인 분석" 한국정책분석평가학회 16 (16): 1-28, 2006

    7 이석환, "성과평가제도의 수용성에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구: 평가체계요인과 내부동기요인을 중심으로" 서울행정학회 20 (20): 269-291, 2010

    8 김민영, "성과평가제도 수용성의 선행 및 결과요인에 관한 연구:한국 NGO를 중심으로" 한국정책분석평가학회 23 (23): 87-125, 2013

    9 김범규, "기관평가지표 및 외형적 특성이 연구기관평가 결과 수용성에 미치는 영향" 금융지식연구소 11 (11): 183-202, 2013

    10 김현구, "광역자치단체 합동평가체제의 실증분석" 한국정책분석평가학회 13 (13): 125-148, 2003

    11 Miyoshi, Koichi, "Toward a More Holistic Evaluation Approach for Rural Development" 34 (34): 587-589, 2013

    12 Hermans, Leon, "The Usefulness of Game Theory as a Method for Policy Evaluation" 20 (20): 10-25, 2014

    13 Hanberger, Anders, "The Real Functions of Evaluation and Response Systems" 17 (17): 327-349, 2011

    14 Yarbrough, Danald B., "The Program Evaluation Standards" SAGE Publications, Inc 2011

    15 Veloso, Luísa, "The Portuguese Schools’ Evaluation Programme: A Sociological Approach to the Participation of Social Actors" 19 (19): 110-125, 2013

    16 Cullen, Anne E., "The Politics and Consequences of Including Stakeholders in International Development Evaluation" 32 (32): 345-361, 2011

    17 Jacobson, Miriam R., "The Nature and Frequency of Inclusion of People with Disabilities in Program Evaluation" 34 (34): 23-44, 2013

    18 Ton, Giel, "The Mixing of Methods : A Three-Step Process for Improving Rigour in Impact Evaluations" 18 (18): 5-25, 2012

    19 Tapella, Esteban, "Shared Learning and Participatory Evaluation : The Sistematización Approach to Assess Development Interventions" 20 (20): 115-133, 2014

    20 Lepori, Benedetto, "S&T Indicators as a Tool for Formative Evaluation of Research Programs" 18 (18): 451-465, 2012

    21 Kim, Chan Dong, "Reform proposals of CELG for development strategy of local autonomy" 461-492, 2014

    22 Greenwald, Howard P., "Increasing the Value of Evaluation to Philanthropic Foundations" 34 (34): 504-518, 2013

    23 Ryan, Katherine, "Improving Survey Methods With Cognitive Interviews in Small and Medium Scale Evaluations" 33 (33): 414-430, 2012

    24 Barrados, Maria, "Improving Program Results Through the Use of Predictive Operational Performance Indicators: A Canadian Case Study" 34 (34): 45-56, 2013

    25 Wholey, Joseph S., "Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation" John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2010

    26 Azzam, Tarek, "GIS in Evaluation : Utilizing the Power of Geographic Information Systems to Represent Evaluation Data" 34 (34): 207-224, 2013

    27 Russ-Eft, Darlene F., "Evaluator Competencies: Standards for the Practice of Evaluation in Organizations" Jossey-Bass 2008

    28 Azzam, Tarek, "Evaluator Characteristics and Methodological Choice" 32 (32): 376-391, 2011

    29 Højlund, Steven, "Evaluation Use in the Organizational Context–Changing Focus to Improve Theory" 20 (20): 26-43, 2014

    30 Stufflebeam, Daniel L., "Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications" Jossey-Bass 2007

    31 MOSPA, "Evaluation Indicators and Manual of CELG 2014" MOSPA 2013

    32 Souza Denise E. de, "Elaborating the Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configuration (CMOc) in Realist Evaluation: A Critical Realist Perspective" 19 (19): 141-154, 2013

    33 Lladó, Anna Planas, "Design and Application of a System of Evaluation Indicators for Municipal Cultural Policies" 17 (17): 277-291, 2011

    34 Simon, Dagmar, "Can Evaluation Contribute to the Organizational Development of Academic Institutions? An International Comparison" 19 (19): 402-418, 2013

    35 Chelimsky, Eleanor., "Balancing Evaluation Theory and Practice in the Real World" 34 (34): 91-98, 2013

    36 Cousins, J. Bradley, "Arguments for a Common Set of Principles for Collaborative Inquiry in Evaluation" 34 (34): 7-22, 2013

    37 Kim, Tae Hee., "Antecedents to employees’ acceptance of and satisfaction with performance measurement and management system" 4 (4): 95-114, 2011

    38 Kurejšepi, Esad, "Acceptance of Self-Evaluation of Teachers in Lower Primary Schools" 3 (3): 16-18, 2013

    39 Kang, Whang Sun, "A study on the Improvement Plan for the Acceptance of Public Servants about the Organization Performance Evaluation Results" 16 (16): 789-811, 2004

    40 Fukushima, Kazunori, "A Theoretical Framework for Performance Evaluation Acceptance" 22 (22): 13-20, 2009

    41 Park, Hae Yug, "A Study on the Redesign of the Combined Evaluation of Local Government" 20 : 95-118, 2013

    42 Park, Hae Yug, "A Study on the Citizen Participation in the process of Self-Evaluation in Local Governments" Korea Research Institute of Local Government 2006

    43 Lapreeière, Hélène, "A Socio-Political Framework for Evaluability Assessment of Participatory Evaluations of Partnerships: Making Sense of the Power Differentials in Programs That Involve the State and Civil Society" 18 (18): 246-259, 2012

    44 Pawson, Ray, "A Realist Diagnostic Workshop" 18 (18): 176-191, 2012

    45 Jackson, Suzanne F., "A New Realistic Evaluation Analysis Method: Linked Coding of Context, Mechanism, and Outcome Relationships" 33 (33): 339-349, 2012

    46 MOSPA, "2014 CELG Implementation and Operating Plan for Combined Evaluation Group" MOSPA 2014

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.73 0.73 0.64
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.95 0.738 0.32
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼