1 박우서, "현행 합동평가제도의 개선방안" 사회과학연구소 36 : 47-72, 2005
2 고성철, "합동평가 시책 및 대상과제의 대표성 확보에 관한 연구" 한국정책분석평가학회 15 (15): 213-239, 2005
3 라휘문, "지방행정 혁신평가결과의 수용도에 대한 영향요인 분석" 한국지방행정연구원 21 (21): 199-224, 2007
4 류영아, "지방자치단체 합동평가에 대한 지방공무원의 인식 비교연구" 한국지방정부학회 16 (16): 291-308, 2012
5 류영아, "지방자치단체 메타평가 제도 정착의 영향요인: 중앙과 지방공무원의 인식을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 43 (43): 97-119, 2009
6 김현구, "정부업무평가 기본법의 논리와 과제: 평가성공의 제도적 요인 분석" 한국정책분석평가학회 16 (16): 1-28, 2006
7 이석환, "성과평가제도의 수용성에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구: 평가체계요인과 내부동기요인을 중심으로" 서울행정학회 20 (20): 269-291, 2010
8 김민영, "성과평가제도 수용성의 선행 및 결과요인에 관한 연구:한국 NGO를 중심으로" 한국정책분석평가학회 23 (23): 87-125, 2013
9 김범규, "기관평가지표 및 외형적 특성이 연구기관평가 결과 수용성에 미치는 영향" 금융지식연구소 11 (11): 183-202, 2013
10 김현구, "광역자치단체 합동평가체제의 실증분석" 한국정책분석평가학회 13 (13): 125-148, 2003
1 박우서, "현행 합동평가제도의 개선방안" 사회과학연구소 36 : 47-72, 2005
2 고성철, "합동평가 시책 및 대상과제의 대표성 확보에 관한 연구" 한국정책분석평가학회 15 (15): 213-239, 2005
3 라휘문, "지방행정 혁신평가결과의 수용도에 대한 영향요인 분석" 한국지방행정연구원 21 (21): 199-224, 2007
4 류영아, "지방자치단체 합동평가에 대한 지방공무원의 인식 비교연구" 한국지방정부학회 16 (16): 291-308, 2012
5 류영아, "지방자치단체 메타평가 제도 정착의 영향요인: 중앙과 지방공무원의 인식을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 43 (43): 97-119, 2009
6 김현구, "정부업무평가 기본법의 논리와 과제: 평가성공의 제도적 요인 분석" 한국정책분석평가학회 16 (16): 1-28, 2006
7 이석환, "성과평가제도의 수용성에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구: 평가체계요인과 내부동기요인을 중심으로" 서울행정학회 20 (20): 269-291, 2010
8 김민영, "성과평가제도 수용성의 선행 및 결과요인에 관한 연구:한국 NGO를 중심으로" 한국정책분석평가학회 23 (23): 87-125, 2013
9 김범규, "기관평가지표 및 외형적 특성이 연구기관평가 결과 수용성에 미치는 영향" 금융지식연구소 11 (11): 183-202, 2013
10 김현구, "광역자치단체 합동평가체제의 실증분석" 한국정책분석평가학회 13 (13): 125-148, 2003
11 Miyoshi, Koichi, "Toward a More Holistic Evaluation Approach for Rural Development" 34 (34): 587-589, 2013
12 Hermans, Leon, "The Usefulness of Game Theory as a Method for Policy Evaluation" 20 (20): 10-25, 2014
13 Hanberger, Anders, "The Real Functions of Evaluation and Response Systems" 17 (17): 327-349, 2011
14 Yarbrough, Danald B., "The Program Evaluation Standards" SAGE Publications, Inc 2011
15 Veloso, Luísa, "The Portuguese Schools’ Evaluation Programme: A Sociological Approach to the Participation of Social Actors" 19 (19): 110-125, 2013
16 Cullen, Anne E., "The Politics and Consequences of Including Stakeholders in International Development Evaluation" 32 (32): 345-361, 2011
17 Jacobson, Miriam R., "The Nature and Frequency of Inclusion of People with Disabilities in Program Evaluation" 34 (34): 23-44, 2013
18 Ton, Giel, "The Mixing of Methods : A Three-Step Process for Improving Rigour in Impact Evaluations" 18 (18): 5-25, 2012
19 Tapella, Esteban, "Shared Learning and Participatory Evaluation : The Sistematización Approach to Assess Development Interventions" 20 (20): 115-133, 2014
20 Lepori, Benedetto, "S&T Indicators as a Tool for Formative Evaluation of Research Programs" 18 (18): 451-465, 2012
21 Kim, Chan Dong, "Reform proposals of CELG for development strategy of local autonomy" 461-492, 2014
22 Greenwald, Howard P., "Increasing the Value of Evaluation to Philanthropic Foundations" 34 (34): 504-518, 2013
23 Ryan, Katherine, "Improving Survey Methods With Cognitive Interviews in Small and Medium Scale Evaluations" 33 (33): 414-430, 2012
24 Barrados, Maria, "Improving Program Results Through the Use of Predictive Operational Performance Indicators: A Canadian Case Study" 34 (34): 45-56, 2013
25 Wholey, Joseph S., "Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation" John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2010
26 Azzam, Tarek, "GIS in Evaluation : Utilizing the Power of Geographic Information Systems to Represent Evaluation Data" 34 (34): 207-224, 2013
27 Russ-Eft, Darlene F., "Evaluator Competencies: Standards for the Practice of Evaluation in Organizations" Jossey-Bass 2008
28 Azzam, Tarek, "Evaluator Characteristics and Methodological Choice" 32 (32): 376-391, 2011
29 Højlund, Steven, "Evaluation Use in the Organizational Context–Changing Focus to Improve Theory" 20 (20): 26-43, 2014
30 Stufflebeam, Daniel L., "Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications" Jossey-Bass 2007
31 MOSPA, "Evaluation Indicators and Manual of CELG 2014" MOSPA 2013
32 Souza Denise E. de, "Elaborating the Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configuration (CMOc) in Realist Evaluation: A Critical Realist Perspective" 19 (19): 141-154, 2013
33 Lladó, Anna Planas, "Design and Application of a System of Evaluation Indicators for Municipal Cultural Policies" 17 (17): 277-291, 2011
34 Simon, Dagmar, "Can Evaluation Contribute to the Organizational Development of Academic Institutions? An International Comparison" 19 (19): 402-418, 2013
35 Chelimsky, Eleanor., "Balancing Evaluation Theory and Practice in the Real World" 34 (34): 91-98, 2013
36 Cousins, J. Bradley, "Arguments for a Common Set of Principles for Collaborative Inquiry in Evaluation" 34 (34): 7-22, 2013
37 Kim, Tae Hee., "Antecedents to employees’ acceptance of and satisfaction with performance measurement and management system" 4 (4): 95-114, 2011
38 Kurejšepi, Esad, "Acceptance of Self-Evaluation of Teachers in Lower Primary Schools" 3 (3): 16-18, 2013
39 Kang, Whang Sun, "A study on the Improvement Plan for the Acceptance of Public Servants about the Organization Performance Evaluation Results" 16 (16): 789-811, 2004
40 Fukushima, Kazunori, "A Theoretical Framework for Performance Evaluation Acceptance" 22 (22): 13-20, 2009
41 Park, Hae Yug, "A Study on the Redesign of the Combined Evaluation of Local Government" 20 : 95-118, 2013
42 Park, Hae Yug, "A Study on the Citizen Participation in the process of Self-Evaluation in Local Governments" Korea Research Institute of Local Government 2006
43 Lapreeière, Hélène, "A Socio-Political Framework for Evaluability Assessment of Participatory Evaluations of Partnerships: Making Sense of the Power Differentials in Programs That Involve the State and Civil Society" 18 (18): 246-259, 2012
44 Pawson, Ray, "A Realist Diagnostic Workshop" 18 (18): 176-191, 2012
45 Jackson, Suzanne F., "A New Realistic Evaluation Analysis Method: Linked Coding of Context, Mechanism, and Outcome Relationships" 33 (33): 339-349, 2012
46 MOSPA, "2014 CELG Implementation and Operating Plan for Combined Evaluation Group" MOSPA 2014