RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Evidence for the Potential Use of Curriculum-Based Measures in Writing for Screening: A Review of the Literature

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105006920

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this review was to examine evidence for the potential use of curriculum-basedmeasures of writing (CBM-W) as screening tools. A total of 12 studies were reviewed with particularattention to the extent of validity coefficients and classification accuracy of CBM-W. Findingsindicated that CBM-W has sufficient validity with established criterion measures of writing includingstandardized assessments, teachers’ holistic ratings, and qualitative measures, and supported its use asa valid indicator of students’ overall writing performance. Preliminary promising evidence indicatedthat CBM-W accurately identified students at risk in writing. Types of CBM-W prompts showingadequate technical features for older and younger elementary students are discussed. Implications forresearch and practice are presented.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this review was to examine evidence for the potential use of curriculum-basedmeasures of writing (CBM-W) as screening tools. A total of 12 studies were reviewed with particularattention to the extent of validity coefficients and classif...

      The purpose of this review was to examine evidence for the potential use of curriculum-basedmeasures of writing (CBM-W) as screening tools. A total of 12 studies were reviewed with particularattention to the extent of validity coefficients and classification accuracy of CBM-W. Findingsindicated that CBM-W has sufficient validity with established criterion measures of writing includingstandardized assessments, teachers’ holistic ratings, and qualitative measures, and supported its use asa valid indicator of students’ overall writing performance. Preliminary promising evidence indicatedthat CBM-W accurately identified students at risk in writing. Types of CBM-W prompts showingadequate technical features for older and younger elementary students are discussed. Implications forresearch and practice are presented.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Woodcock, R. W., "Woodcock Johnson II!Tests of Achievement Normative Update" Riverside 2001

      2 Stecker, P. M., "Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement : Review of research" 42 : 795-819, 2005

      3 Graney S. B., "Universal screening of reading in late elementary school" 31 : 368-377, 2010

      4 Berninger, V. W., "Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers : Transfer from handwriting to composition" 89 : 652-666, 1997

      5 Berninger, V. W., "Tier 1 and tier 2 early intervention for handwriting and composing" 44 : 3-30, 2006

      6 Jewell, J., "The utility of CBM written language indices: An investigation of production-dependent, production-independent, and accurate-production scores" 34 : 27-44, 2005

      7 Gansle, K. A., "The technical adequacy of curriculum-based and rating-based measures of written expression for elementary school students" 35 : 435-450, 2006

      8 Hammill, D. D., "Test of written language" Austin 1996

      9 Hresko, W. P., "Test of Early Written Language" Pro Ed 1996

      10 McMaster, K. L., "Technical features of curriculum-based measures for beginning writers" 42 : 41-60, 2009

      1 Woodcock, R. W., "Woodcock Johnson II!Tests of Achievement Normative Update" Riverside 2001

      2 Stecker, P. M., "Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement : Review of research" 42 : 795-819, 2005

      3 Graney S. B., "Universal screening of reading in late elementary school" 31 : 368-377, 2010

      4 Berninger, V. W., "Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers : Transfer from handwriting to composition" 89 : 652-666, 1997

      5 Berninger, V. W., "Tier 1 and tier 2 early intervention for handwriting and composing" 44 : 3-30, 2006

      6 Jewell, J., "The utility of CBM written language indices: An investigation of production-dependent, production-independent, and accurate-production scores" 34 : 27-44, 2005

      7 Gansle, K. A., "The technical adequacy of curriculum-based and rating-based measures of written expression for elementary school students" 35 : 435-450, 2006

      8 Hammill, D. D., "Test of written language" Austin 1996

      9 Hresko, W. P., "Test of Early Written Language" Pro Ed 1996

      10 McMaster, K. L., "Technical features of curriculum-based measures for beginning writers" 42 : 41-60, 2009

      11 McMaster, K. L., "Technical features of curriculum-based measurement in writing" 41 : 68-84, 2007

      12 Berninger, V. W., "Teaching spelling and composition alone and together : Implications for the simple view of writing" 94 : 291-304, 2002

      13 Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement, "Stanford Achievement Test, Ninth Edition" Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement 1996

      14 Madden, R., "Stanford Achievement Test" Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1978

      15 Jenkins, J. R., "Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework" 36 : 582-600, 2007

      16 Johnson, E., "Responsiveness to intervention (RTI): How to do it" National Research Center on Learning Disabilities 2006

      17 Deno. S. L., "Relationships among simple measures of written expression and performance on standardized achievementtests" University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities 1980

      18 Jones, D., "Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text" 91 : 44-49, 1999

      19 Foegen, A., "Progress monitoring measures in mathematics : A review of the literature" 41 : 121-139, 2007

      20 Gansle, K. A., "Moving beyond total words written : The reliability, criterion validity, and time cost of alternative measures for curriculum-based measurement in writing" 31 : 477-497, 2002

      21 Berninger, V. W., "Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing" 2 : 57-81, 1994

      22 Thorndike, R. M., "Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education" Pearson Education 2010

      23 Fuchs, L. S., "Mathematics screening and progress monitoring at first grade : Implications for responsiveness to intervention" 73 : 311-330, 2007

      24 Wayman, M. M., "Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading" 41 : 85-120, 2007

      25 Berninger, V. W., "Language-based spelling instruction : Teaching children to make multiple connections between spoken and written words" 23 : 117-135, 2000

      26 Mitzel, H. C., "LEAP for the 21st century: 1999 operational final technical report" CTB/McGraw-Hill 2000

      27 Graham, S., "Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers" 92 : 620-633, 2000

      28 Hoover, H. D., "Iowa Tests of Basic Skills" Riverside Publishing 1996

      29 "Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400"

      30 Graham, S., "Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers : Theoretical and programmatic research from the center on accelerating student learning" 39 : 19-33, 2005

      31 Tindal, G., "Identifying measures for evaluating written expression" 6 : 211-218, 1991

      32 Lembke, E., "Identifying an indicator of growth in early writing proficiency for elementary school students" 28 : 23-35, 2003

      33 Graham, S., "Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities : A review" 22 : 78-98, 1999

      34 Ardoin, S. P., "Examining the incremental benefits of administering a maze and three versus one curriculum-based measurement reading probes when conducting universal screening" 33 : 218-233, 2004

      35 Berninger, V. W., "Early intervention for spelling problems : Teaching functional spelling units of varying size with a multiple-connections framework" 90 : 587-605, 1998

      36 Deno, S. L., "Developments in curriculum-based measurement" 37 : 184-192, 2003

      37 Lee, L., "Developmental sentence scoring" 36 : 335-340, 1971

      38 Diercks-Gransee, B., "Curriculumbased measures of writing for high school students" 30 : 360-371, 2009

      39 Weissenburger, J. W., "Curriculum-based measures of writing across grade levels" 43 : 153-169, 2005

      40 McMaster, K. L., "Curriculum-based measures of beginning writing : Technical features of the slope" 77 : 185-206, 2011

      41 Coker. D. L., "Curriculum-based measurement of writing in kindergarten and first grade : An investigation of production and qualitative scores" 76 : 175-193, 2010

      42 Deno, S. L., "Curriculum-based measurement : The emerging alternative" 52 : 219-232, 1985

      43 Parker, R., "Countable indices of writing quality : Their suitability for screening-eligibility decisions" 2 : 1-17, 1991

      44 Videen, J., "Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of proficiency in written expression" University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities 1982

      45 Graham, S., "Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers" 94 : 669-686, 2002

      46 National Govemors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers, "Common Core State Standards" National Govemors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers 2010

      47 McMaster, K. L., "Assessment and intervention: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities vol. 24" Emerald 111-148, 2011

      48 Tindal, G., "Analyzing student writing to develop instructional strategies" 6 : 237-245, 1991

      49 Ritchey, K. D., "An investigation of the validity and utility of two curriculum-based measurement writing tasks" 29 : 89-119, 2013

      50 Gansle, K. A., "An examination of the criterion validity and sensitivity to brief intervention of alternate curriculum-based measures of writing skill" 41 : 291-300, 2004

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-08-09 학술지등록 한글명 : 특수교육학연구
      외국어명 : Korean Jounral of Special Education
      KCI등재
      2005-01-27 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society For Special Education -> The Korean Society of Special Education KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.99 0.99 1.18
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.23 1.3 1.503 0.5
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼