RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    신화의 가능세계와 의미론 : 가능세계의 특성과 관계를 중심으로 = Possible world and Semantic of Mythology : focusing on the features and accesbility relations of the possible world

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The inner principle of the myth-texts makes us grasp the features and construct the semantics system of mythology. According to possible world semantics, there are three worlds associated with text, actual world, textual actual world and textual referential world. As with general fictions, textual referential worlds does not match the actual worlds in the myths. And myths have self referentiality as with fictions, so textual actual worlds and textual referential worlds are a match. Then the fact that actual worlds match textual actual worlds makes us distinguish the myths from general literature texts in that respect.

    Historic fictions(true fiction) which actual worlds match textual actual worlds fill in the gap of information with every probabilities. On the other hand, unrealistic and fantastic affairs in myths should be reintegrated in actual worlds, because they are very essential and natural. When compared with fantasy, the purpose and main idea of fantasy is to create new and alternative worlds but that of myth is to bring the unrealistic worlds into the actual worlds. So myths recenter possible worlds as actual worlds in textual universe. And to understand the possible worlds in myths is to construct semantics system distinguishing the nature of myth itself.

    번역하기

    The inner principle of the myth-texts makes us grasp the features and construct the semantics system of mythology. According to possible world semantics, there are three worlds associated with text, actual world, textual actual world and textual refer...

    The inner principle of the myth-texts makes us grasp the features and construct the semantics system of mythology. According to possible world semantics, there are three worlds associated with text, actual world, textual actual world and textual referential world. As with general fictions, textual referential worlds does not match the actual worlds in the myths. And myths have self referentiality as with fictions, so textual actual worlds and textual referential worlds are a match. Then the fact that actual worlds match textual actual worlds makes us distinguish the myths from general literature texts in that respect.

    Historic fictions(true fiction) which actual worlds match textual actual worlds fill in the gap of information with every probabilities. On the other hand, unrealistic and fantastic affairs in myths should be reintegrated in actual worlds, because they are very essential and natural. When compared with fantasy, the purpose and main idea of fantasy is to create new and alternative worlds but that of myth is to bring the unrealistic worlds into the actual worlds. So myths recenter possible worlds as actual worlds in textual universe. And to understand the possible worlds in myths is to construct semantics system distinguishing the nature of myth itself.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 나경수, "한극의 신화" 한얼미디어 10-408, 2006

    2 오세정, "한국 신화의 원형적 상상력의 구조 In: 설화와 상상력" 제이앤씨 85-118, 2008

    3 오세정, "한국 신화의 생성과 소통 원리" 한국학술정보 1-312, 2005

    4 최원오, "한국 신화 연구의 쟁점과 과제" 9 : 7-36, 2003

    5 Roland Barthes, "텍스트로 In: 텍스트의 즐거움" 동문선 1-272, 2002

    6 Umbert Eco, "열린 예술작품" 새물결 1-352, 1995

    7 왕빈, "신화학 입문" 금란 1-232, 1980

    8 김윤애, "서양의 철학적 사유구조에 나타난 신화 - 동아시아 신화에 대한 철학적 분석을 위하여" 한국기호학회 1 (1): 101-145, 2004

    9 Lucian Boia, "상상력의 세계사" 동문선 1-289, 2000

    10 Nicholas Rescher, "The Possible and the Actual: Readings in the Metaphysics of Modality" Cornell University Press 166-181, 1979

    1 나경수, "한극의 신화" 한얼미디어 10-408, 2006

    2 오세정, "한국 신화의 원형적 상상력의 구조 In: 설화와 상상력" 제이앤씨 85-118, 2008

    3 오세정, "한국 신화의 생성과 소통 원리" 한국학술정보 1-312, 2005

    4 최원오, "한국 신화 연구의 쟁점과 과제" 9 : 7-36, 2003

    5 Roland Barthes, "텍스트로 In: 텍스트의 즐거움" 동문선 1-272, 2002

    6 Umbert Eco, "열린 예술작품" 새물결 1-352, 1995

    7 왕빈, "신화학 입문" 금란 1-232, 1980

    8 김윤애, "서양의 철학적 사유구조에 나타난 신화 - 동아시아 신화에 대한 철학적 분석을 위하여" 한국기호학회 1 (1): 101-145, 2004

    9 Lucian Boia, "상상력의 세계사" 동문선 1-289, 2000

    10 Nicholas Rescher, "The Possible and the Actual: Readings in the Metaphysics of Modality" Cornell University Press 166-181, 1979

    11 Claud Lévi-Strauss, "Structural Anthropology" Penguin Books 1-383, 1963

    12 Samuel Kripke, "Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic" 16 : 83-94,

    13 Ruth Ronen, "Possible Worlds in Literary Theory" Cambridge University Press 1-244, 1994

    14 Joseph Melia, "Possible Worlds" 7 : 570-573, 1998

    15 Maire-Laure Ryan, "Possible World sand Accesbility Relations: A Semantic Typology of Fiction" 12 (12): 553-576, 1991

    16 Algridas Julien Greimas, "On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotics Theory" University of Minnesota Press 1237-, 1987

    17 Lubomír Doležel, "Mimesis and Possible World" 9 (9): 475-496, 1998

    18 Katheryn Hume, "Fantasy and Mimesis-Responsesto Realityin Western Literature" Methuen 1-213, 1984

    19 David Lewis, "Counterfactuals[1973] In: The Possible and the Actual:Readingsin the Metaphysics of Modality" Cornell University Press 182-189, 1979

    20 Charles Hartshorene, "Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce 2" The Belknep Press of Harvard University Press 1965

    21 Tzbetan Todorov, "A Structural Approach to Literary Genre" Press of Case Western Reserve University 1-183, 1973

    22 우찬제, "21세기 저자와 열린 텍스트 In: 고독한 공생" 문학과지성사 70-97, 2003

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2016 평가 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가)
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-05-07 학회명변경 영문명 : The Soceity of Poetics & Linguistics -> The Society of Poetics & Linguistics KCI등재후보
    2007-05-07 학회명변경 영문명 : Poetics & Linguistics -> The Soceity of Poetics & Linguistics KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼