RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      폭력외교연구  :  현대 외교에 있어서 군사력의 역할 The Role of Military Forces in the Contemporary Diplomacy = Diplomacy of Violence

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2083983

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The main purpose of this paper is to examine the role of violence in the contemporary diplomacy.
      The "pure" diplomacy between two actors can be defined as a nonviolent act of negotiation to maximize their interests. However, the "real" diplomacy in the contemporary world order has to use violent and nonviolent means for its ends. The diplomacy of violence is thus an essential part of the contemporary diplomacy.
      The united States has used military forces short of war as An instrument of diplomacy on 215 occasions between 1946 and 1975. In Parallel, the Soviet Union Las employed its military forces in 190 incidents for political purposes during the years of 1944∼1979.
      Although the importance of military forces in the contemporary diplomacy has been partially declined in parallel with the changing nature of the world order,'the role of violence in the contemporary diplomacy. which is directly related with the structural weakness of the world order, cannot be easily declined in the near future.
      번역하기

      The main purpose of this paper is to examine the role of violence in the contemporary diplomacy. The "pure" diplomacy between two actors can be defined as a nonviolent act of negotiation to maximize their interests. However, the "real" diplomacy in...

      The main purpose of this paper is to examine the role of violence in the contemporary diplomacy.
      The "pure" diplomacy between two actors can be defined as a nonviolent act of negotiation to maximize their interests. However, the "real" diplomacy in the contemporary world order has to use violent and nonviolent means for its ends. The diplomacy of violence is thus an essential part of the contemporary diplomacy.
      The united States has used military forces short of war as An instrument of diplomacy on 215 occasions between 1946 and 1975. In Parallel, the Soviet Union Las employed its military forces in 190 incidents for political purposes during the years of 1944∼1979.
      Although the importance of military forces in the contemporary diplomacy has been partially declined in parallel with the changing nature of the world order,'the role of violence in the contemporary diplomacy. which is directly related with the structural weakness of the world order, cannot be easily declined in the near future.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 외교와 폭력
      • Ⅱ. 폭력외교의 현실
      • Ⅲ. 폭력외교의 미래
      • Ⅳ. 맺는말
      • Ⅰ. 외교와 폭력
      • Ⅱ. 폭력외교의 현실
      • Ⅲ. 폭력외교의 미래
      • Ⅳ. 맺는말
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼