In the last two decades research about e-government and how to have a successful implementation has spread out and scholars contribute to have a vast variety of information about it. Many topics were covered but with the developed countries taking the...
In the last two decades research about e-government and how to have a successful implementation has spread out and scholars contribute to have a vast variety of information about it. Many topics were covered but with the developed countries taking the lead in the field of e-government is a fact that the majority of the research is related to them and their experiences. Within the last decade more authors are taking the step to talk about the cases of developing countries comparing them with the developed countries’ experiences.
All of these authors are trying to find the way to apply the successful experience of the developed countries into the developing ones through researching and suggesting. Some argue that it is possible for developing countries to rich the e-government implementations’ success of the developed countries following the same steps and finding help from them to achieve it. Other more skeptical authors point out the impossibility of trying to apply other experiences, and even say that the e-government implementation will fail in developing countries.
However, very small amount of them took into consideration the differences or so called barriers that developing and developed countries have not in common. The researchers presented in many books the “common” barriers experienced by countries that want to implement the e-government, but is it well known that many differences exist between developed and developing countries. The differences are not only in structural, economical or statistical factors, but also in cultural, social and geographical ones.
The thesis presented an important question whether the “social barriers” are a determining factor in the implementation of e-government in Peru. To answer this question fully the present paper was divided into 3 parts: the first pointing out the existing “common barriers” for the e-government implementation, the second one discusses barriers that affect specifically the developing countries and third one trying to find out more about the social barriers in Peru and if they really can be called a barrier for the implementation.
In order to do so the researcher conducted an interview, collected data and information from governmental and nongovernmental sources. A consensus between the information and the data given by interviewees was found about the importance of the social aspect in the e-government implementation, which was implicit in all the barriers that the country has experience.
Different reasons for the existence of “Social barriers” were found out; the interviews were analyzed and compared between each other and with the data from organizations. Due to the difficulties experienced with the present paper we should be careful in generalizing the findings of this research.
Finally, I suggested several ways to overcome the social barriers in Peru in order to find the way to have a successful implementation of the e-government such as policies related to citizens and marketing of them and so far. Regarding the topics the Peruvian authorities have a long way to go but I am firmly convinced that it can be achieved with more students and researchers working in this direction.