RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      회생대명사의 인허에 대하여 = On the License of Resumptive Pronoun

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103969835

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper aims at exploring the possibilities of syntactic explanation for resumptive pronouns occurring in English relative clauses. The 'spelt- out trace' approach to resumptive pronouns, in which they are considered to be Spell-Outs of illicit traces and thus to save violations of syntactic conditions, is claimed to have some theory-internal problems. Instead, we assume the 'base-generation approach' to resumptive pronouns on the hypothesis that a CRP (Covert Resumptive Pronoun) is base-generated and converted to an ORP (Overt Resumptive Pronoun) following the 'visibility condition of resumptive pronoun[s]' proposed by Gu (2001).
      However, the required qualification of the licensor, which needs to be defined by parametric variation, plays an important role either in converting the CRP to ORP, or in preventing the CRP from converting to an ORP. But Gu's (2001) 'visibility condition of resumptive pronoun[s]' is found not to be sufficient enough to account for some structures in English. Thus, along with parametric variation of licensors, his 'visibility condition of resumptive pronouns' can be revised to account for incorrectly predicted grammaticality of some English sentences, including resumptive pronouns in relative clauses.
      번역하기

      This paper aims at exploring the possibilities of syntactic explanation for resumptive pronouns occurring in English relative clauses. The 'spelt- out trace' approach to resumptive pronouns, in which they are considered to be Spell-Outs of illicit tra...

      This paper aims at exploring the possibilities of syntactic explanation for resumptive pronouns occurring in English relative clauses. The 'spelt- out trace' approach to resumptive pronouns, in which they are considered to be Spell-Outs of illicit traces and thus to save violations of syntactic conditions, is claimed to have some theory-internal problems. Instead, we assume the 'base-generation approach' to resumptive pronouns on the hypothesis that a CRP (Covert Resumptive Pronoun) is base-generated and converted to an ORP (Overt Resumptive Pronoun) following the 'visibility condition of resumptive pronoun[s]' proposed by Gu (2001).
      However, the required qualification of the licensor, which needs to be defined by parametric variation, plays an important role either in converting the CRP to ORP, or in preventing the CRP from converting to an ORP. But Gu's (2001) 'visibility condition of resumptive pronoun[s]' is found not to be sufficient enough to account for some structures in English. Thus, along with parametric variation of licensors, his 'visibility condition of resumptive pronouns' can be revised to account for incorrectly predicted grammaticality of some English sentences, including resumptive pronouns in relative clauses.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" MIT Press 1995

      2 Prince, Ellen, "Syntax and discourse: a look at resumptive pronouns" 482-497, 1990

      3 Sells, Peter, "Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns" University of Massachusetts 1984

      4 Chomsky, Noam, "Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding" MIT Press 1982

      5 Freidin, Robert, "Review of The Minimalist Program" 73 : 571-582, 1997

      6 Shlonsky, Ur, "Resumptive pronouns as a last resort" 23 : 443-468, 1992

      7 Rizzi, Luigi, "Relativized Minimality" MIT Press 1990

      8 Pesetsky, D., "Principles of sentence pronunciation" MIT Press 1998

      9 Chomsky, Noam, "Minimalist inquiries: the framework" MIT Press 2000

      10 Huang, J., "Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar" MIT 1982

      1 Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" MIT Press 1995

      2 Prince, Ellen, "Syntax and discourse: a look at resumptive pronouns" 482-497, 1990

      3 Sells, Peter, "Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns" University of Massachusetts 1984

      4 Chomsky, Noam, "Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding" MIT Press 1982

      5 Freidin, Robert, "Review of The Minimalist Program" 73 : 571-582, 1997

      6 Shlonsky, Ur, "Resumptive pronouns as a last resort" 23 : 443-468, 1992

      7 Rizzi, Luigi, "Relativized Minimality" MIT Press 1990

      8 Pesetsky, D., "Principles of sentence pronunciation" MIT Press 1998

      9 Chomsky, Noam, "Minimalist inquiries: the framework" MIT Press 2000

      10 Huang, J., "Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar" MIT 1982

      11 Riemsdijk, Henk van, "Left dislocation" Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1997

      12 Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on Government and Binding" Dordrecht 1981

      13 Lebeaux, David, "Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar" Amherst 1988

      14 McDaniel, Dana, "Experimental evidence for a minimalist account of English RP's" 70 : 15-24, 1999

      15 Kayne, Richard., "ECP extractions" 12 : 93-133, 1981

      16 Chomsky, Noam, "Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics" MITWPL 2001

      17 Chomsky, Noam, "Barriers" MIT Press 1986

      18 Chomsky, Noam, "A minimalist program for linguistic theory" MIT Press 1993

      19 Gu, Gang, "A Study of Resumptive Pronouns" The Chinese University of Hong Kong 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.45
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.4 0.38 0.67 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼