브랜드 확장제품에 대한 태도에서 광고유형과 조절적 동기의 효과 연구 = Effects of Advertising Strategy and Regulatory Focus on Attitude Toward Brand Extersions

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구의 목적은 모브랜드와 확장제품간의 적합도(적합 vs 부적합), 광고전략유형(관련성 광고 vs 정교화 광고) 그리고 소비자의 조절적 동기(향상동기 vs 방어동기)가 확장제품에 대한 태도에 미치는 효과를 파악하는데 있다.
연구결과, 적합한 범주로 확장할 경우 확장제품에 대한 태도는 조절적 동기에 관계없이 관련성 광고가 효과적인 것으로 나왔다. 그러나 부적합한 범주로 확장할 때는 광고유형의 효과가 조절적 동기에 의해 달라지는 것으로 나타났다. 즉 방어동기 조건에서는 정교화광고가 관련성 광고에 비해 효과적이지만, 향상동기 조건에서는 차이가 없거나 오히려 관련성 광고에서 상대적으로 긍정적인 경향을 보였다. 이같이 부적합한 확장제품에 대한 태도가 광고유형과 조절적 동기에 따라 달라지는 이유는 확장제품에 대해 느끼는 쾌락적 가치와 위험적가치가 다르기 때문인 것으로 분석됐다. 향상동기 조건에서는 정교화 광고보다 관련성 광고일 때 쾌락적가치가 상대적으로 크게 느껴지지만, 방어동기 조건에서는 관련성 광고보다 정교화 광고에서 위험적가치가 낮게 지각됐다.
이 연구는 확장제품에 대한 광고전략을 수립할 때 모브랜드와 확장제품간의 적합도 뿐 아니라 소비자의 동기적 상황도 고려할 필요가 있음을 시사한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of advertising strategy(relational ad vs elaborational ad), regulatory focus(promotion-focused goal vs prevention-focused goal), perceived fit of brand extension(congruent extension vs incongruent extension) on the attitude toward extension product.
The results revealed as followed. The attitude toward the brand extension is more favorable after elaborational ad irrespective of regulatory focus in case of congruent extension. But there is interaction effect between advertising strategy and regulatory focus in case of incongruent extension. Specifically the attitude toward the brand extension is more favorable after elaborational ad when participants are preventionfocused, whereas such effect is eliminated and even reversed when participants are promotion-focused. The results show that this difference of attitude toward the extension is attributed to perceived risk and the perceived hedonic value which differ according to the advertising strategy and regulatory focus.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 나준희, "소비자의 조절적 동기와 광고의 제시유형이 제품태도에 미치는 영향" 16 (16): 263-283, 2005

2 나준희, "소비자의 조절적 동기 유형이 구매후 후회에 미치는 영향" 5 (5): 35-51, 2004

3 이우용, "브랜드확장의 지각된 적합성이 확장제품 광고유형에 따른 소비자 태도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 17 (17): 93-122, 2002

4 전성률, "광고유형에 따른 소비자의 상표확장 평가에 관한 연구" 42 : 31-47, 1999

5 & Alba, "The importance of the brand in brand extension Journal of Marketing Research" 214-228, 1994

6 Lane,V.R, "The Impact of Ad Repetition and Ad Content on Consumer Perceptions of Incongruent Extensions" 64 : 80-91, 2000

7 & Bettman, "The Effects of Brand Positioning Strategies on Consumers' Brand and Category Perceptions Some Insights from Schema Research Journal of Marketing Research" 454-467, 1989

8 & Bettman, "The Effects of Brand Positioning Strategies on Consumers' Brand and Category Perception Some Insights From Schema Research Journal of Marketing Research" (v) : 454-467, 1989

9 Keller, K. L, "Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring and Managing Brand Equity" Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall 2003

10 Crowe, E, "Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making" 69 (69): 117-132, 1997

11 Cesario, J, "Regulatory Fit and Persuasion: Transfer From "Feeling Right"" 86 : 388-404, 2004

12 Sheinin, D.A, "Positioning brand extensions: implications for beliefs and attitudes" 7 (7): 137-149, 1998

13 Elliot, "On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance dissonance as psychological discomfort Journal of Personality and Social Psychology" 382-94, 1994

14 Lockwood, P, "Motivation by Positive or Negative Role Models: Regulatory Focus Determines Who Will Best Inspire Us." 83 (83): 854-864, 2002

15 Camacho, C, "Moral Value Transfer From Regulatory Fit:What Feels Right Is Right and What Feels Wrong Is Wrong" 84 : 498-510, 2003

16 Louie, "How does the congruity of brand names affect evaluations of brand name extensions Journal of Applied Psychology" 1994

17 Pryor, K, "How advertising slogans can prime evaluations of brand extensions : further empirical results" 7 (7): 497-508, 1998

18 Park, "Evaluation of brand extensions the role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency Journal of Consumer Research" 1991185-93

19 Higgins, E.T, "Emotional Responses to Goal Attainment :Intensity of Regulatory Focus as Moderator" 72 : 515-535, 1997

20 Yeo, J, "Effects of Parent-Extension Similarity and Self Regulatory Focus on Evaluations of Brand Extensions" 16 (16): 272-282, 2006

21 A, "Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions Journal of Marketing" 27-41, 1990

22 Kim, J.Y, "Communication message strategies for brand extensions" 12 (12): 462-476, 2003

23 Bridgers, S. K, "Communication Strategies for Brand Extensions: Enhancing Perceived Fit by Establishing Explanatory Links" 29 (29): 2-11, 2000

24 Mervis, "Categorization of Natural Objects Annual Review of Psychology" 89-115, 1981

25 Higgins, E.T, "Beyond Pleasure and Pain" 52 : 1280-1300, 1997

26 Fiske, "Applications to Social Perception The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition" 55-78, 1982

27 MacInnis, "Advances in Consumer Research" 910-916, 1990

28 Park, J.W, "Acceptance of Brand Extensions: Interactive Influences of Product Category Similarity, Typicality of Claimed Benefits, and Brand Relationship Quality" 29 : 190-198, 2002

29 Stanford, "A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance" Stanford University Press 1957

30 & Loken, "A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation Journal of Marketing Research" 16-28, 1991

31 Aaker, J. L, ""I" Seek Pleasures and "We" Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion" 28 : 33-49, 2001