RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      현대인권론과 공리주의 ― 인권의 정당화 ― = Contemporary Theory of Human rights and Utilitarianism ― Justification on Human rights ―

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104209420

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      One of the traditional debate on the objective existence of substantial
      justice and its possibility of knowledge is whether the criteria which apply
      to judge base of moral rights should be distributive and equalitarian one or
      aggregative and utilitarian one. The former stands on the utilitarianism
      which takes preference of community value, the latter lies at the root of
      comtemporary theory of human rights which emphasizes on indispensible
      individual human rights.
      Present-days theory of human rights has criticized utilitarian theory of
      human rights through cognizing human rights as a moral rights and
      developed new alternative theory which could take place of value relativism
      and utilitarinism which has prevailed throughout the field of ethics
      generation after generation.
      By challenging contemporary theory of human rights and utilitarianism,
      I will seek the methodology for ensuring objective justification of human
      rights and establish basis of human rights as a moral rights on the
      philosophy of law.
      번역하기

      One of the traditional debate on the objective existence of substantial justice and its possibility of knowledge is whether the criteria which apply to judge base of moral rights should be distributive and equalitarian one or aggregative and utilitari...

      One of the traditional debate on the objective existence of substantial
      justice and its possibility of knowledge is whether the criteria which apply
      to judge base of moral rights should be distributive and equalitarian one or
      aggregative and utilitarian one. The former stands on the utilitarianism
      which takes preference of community value, the latter lies at the root of
      comtemporary theory of human rights which emphasizes on indispensible
      individual human rights.
      Present-days theory of human rights has criticized utilitarian theory of
      human rights through cognizing human rights as a moral rights and
      developed new alternative theory which could take place of value relativism
      and utilitarinism which has prevailed throughout the field of ethics
      generation after generation.
      By challenging contemporary theory of human rights and utilitarianism,
      I will seek the methodology for ensuring objective justification of human
      rights and establish basis of human rights as a moral rights on the
      philosophy of law.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 프랑케나, "위의 책" 70-74,

      2 김도균, "권리담론의 세 차원: 개념분석, 정당화, 제도화" 한국법철학회 7 (7): 181-210, 2004

      3 M. Cranston, "What are human Rights?" London 6-69, 1973

      4 J. S. Mill, "Utilitarianism in Collected Works of J. S. Mill vol.X: Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society" 73-75, 1969

      5 H. L. A. Hart, "Utilitarianism and Natural Rights" 53 (53): 675-678, 1979

      6 J. Rawls, "Two Concepts of Rules" Duke Univ. Press 3-32, 1955

      7 H. G. Blocker, "Theory of Social Justice: An Introduction" Ohio Univ. Press 1980

      8 R. B. Friedman, "The Basis of Human Rights: A Criticism of Gewirth’s Theory" in Nomos 148-157, 1981

      9 R. M. Dworkin, "Taking Rights Seriously" Havard Univ. Press 234-277, 1977

      10 J. Feinberg, "Social Philosophy" Prentice Hall, Inc 84-85, 1973

      1 프랑케나, "위의 책" 70-74,

      2 김도균, "권리담론의 세 차원: 개념분석, 정당화, 제도화" 한국법철학회 7 (7): 181-210, 2004

      3 M. Cranston, "What are human Rights?" London 6-69, 1973

      4 J. S. Mill, "Utilitarianism in Collected Works of J. S. Mill vol.X: Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society" 73-75, 1969

      5 H. L. A. Hart, "Utilitarianism and Natural Rights" 53 (53): 675-678, 1979

      6 J. Rawls, "Two Concepts of Rules" Duke Univ. Press 3-32, 1955

      7 H. G. Blocker, "Theory of Social Justice: An Introduction" Ohio Univ. Press 1980

      8 R. B. Friedman, "The Basis of Human Rights: A Criticism of Gewirth’s Theory" in Nomos 148-157, 1981

      9 R. M. Dworkin, "Taking Rights Seriously" Havard Univ. Press 234-277, 1977

      10 J. Feinberg, "Social Philosophy" Prentice Hall, Inc 84-85, 1973

      11 J. R. Pennock, "Rights, Natural Rights, and Human Rights: A General view" New York Univ. Press 3-, 1981

      12 A. Gewirth, "Reason and Morality" Univ. of Chicago Press 42-47, 1978

      13 J. Bentham, "Pannomial Fragment in Bentham’s Works" 3 : 181-, 1843

      14 J. S. Mill, "On liberty in Collected Works of J. S. Mill vol.ⅩⅧ: Essays on Politics and Society Part I" Univ. of Toronto Press 228-, 1969

      15 R. M. Hare, "Moral Thinking, Its Levels, Method and point" Clarendon Press 156-, 1981

      16 F. A. Hayek, "Law, Legislation and Liberty" I : 55-71, 1973

      17 Ph. Petit, "Judging Justice" Routridge & Kegan Paul 118-128, 1980

      18 A. Gewirth, "Human Rights: Essays on Justification and Applications" Univ. of Chicago Press 41-, 1982

      19 D. Lyons, "Human Rights and the General Welfare in Philosophy and Public Affairs, no.6" Blackwell Publishing 121-, 1977

      20 H. L. A, "Hart, Rawls on Liberty and its Priority" Univ. of Chicago Law Review 534-555, 1973

      21 J. C. Harsanyi, "Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Method" D. Reidel Publishing Co 1-85, 1976

      22 H. L. A. Hart, "Between Utility and Rights" 79 (79): 829-831, 1979

      23 H. L. A. Hart, "Bentham on Legal Rights in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence" Oxford 1973

      24 R. Nozick, "Anarchy, State, and Utopia" Basic Books 28-33, 1974

      25 J. Bentham, "An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation" Kessinger Publishing 266-, 2005

      26 J. Rawls, "A Theory of Justice" Harvard Univ. Press 1971

      27 A. A. Morris, "A Differential of Human Rights" in Nomos 158-, 1981

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-05-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Philosophy -> Korean Journal of Legal Philosophy KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Journal of Philosophy KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.84 0.84 0.76
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.66 0.64 1.024 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼