The Effects of Coaches' Transformational · Transactional Leadership on Coaching Effectiveness
The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of coaches' leadership styles on players' satisfaction with leadership and coaching effectiveness.
Sec...
The Effects of Coaches' Transformational · Transactional Leadership on Coaching Effectiveness
The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of coaches' leadership styles on players' satisfaction with leadership and coaching effectiveness.
Second, for high school players, two leadership styles' explanatory power of student players' internal satisfaction with leadership was 37.3%, while that of external satisfaction with leadership was 57.8%, And leadership styles and satisfaction with leadership explained 42.5% of the coaching effectiveness. On the other hand, as far as internal satisfaction was concerned, "charisma" and "personal consideration" conditional compensation" and "special management' were found significant. And as far as external satisfaction was concerned, such subcategories as "charisma", "personal consideration" "intellectual stimulation" and "special management" were found significant. For coaching effectiveness, such subcategories as "charisma", "personal consideration", "conditional compensation" and "external satisfaction" were found significant.
Third, for college players, two leadership styles' explanatory power of student players' internal satisfaction with leadership was 35.1%, while that of external satisfaction with leadership was 48.8%, And leadership styles and satisfaction with leadership explained 15% of the coaching effectiveness. On the other hand, as far as internal satisfaction was concerned, "charisma" and "personal consideration" were found significant. And as far as external satisfaction was concerned, such subcategories as "charisma" and "special management" were found significant. For coaching effectiveness, such subcategories as "internal satisfaction" and "intellectual stimulation" were found significant.
Fourth, for the total student players, two leadership styles' explanatory power of student players' internal satisfaction with leadership was 34.9%, while that of external satisfaction with leadership was 52.6%, And leadership styles and satisfaction with leadership explained 25.3% of the coaching effectiveness, On the other hand, as far as internal satisfaction was concerned, "charisma", "personal consideration", conditional compensation" and "special management' were found significant. And as far as external satisfaction was concerned, such subcategories as "charisma" and "special management" were found significant. For coaching effectiveness, such subcategories as "charisma", "personal consideration", "conditional compensation" and "internal satisfaction" were found significant.