변환적ㆍ상통적 리더십이 스포츠 지도자의 지도 효율성에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of Coaches´ TransformationalㆍTransactional Leadership on Coaching Effectiveness

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Effects of Coaches' Transformational · Transactional Leadership on Coaching Effectiveness
The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of coaches' leadership styles on players' satisfaction with leadership and coaching effectiveness.
Second, for high school players, two leadership styles' explanatory power of student players' internal satisfaction with leadership was 37.3%, while that of external satisfaction with leadership was 57.8%, And leadership styles and satisfaction with leadership explained 42.5% of the coaching effectiveness. On the other hand, as far as internal satisfaction was concerned, "charisma" and "personal consideration" conditional compensation" and "special management' were found significant. And as far as external satisfaction was concerned, such subcategories as "charisma", "personal consideration" "intellectual stimulation" and "special management" were found significant. For coaching effectiveness, such subcategories as "charisma", "personal consideration", "conditional compensation" and "external satisfaction" were found significant.
Third, for college players, two leadership styles' explanatory power of student players' internal satisfaction with leadership was 35.1%, while that of external satisfaction with leadership was 48.8%, And leadership styles and satisfaction with leadership explained 15% of the coaching effectiveness. On the other hand, as far as internal satisfaction was concerned, "charisma" and "personal consideration" were found significant. And as far as external satisfaction was concerned, such subcategories as "charisma" and "special management" were found significant. For coaching effectiveness, such subcategories as "internal satisfaction" and "intellectual stimulation" were found significant.
Fourth, for the total student players, two leadership styles' explanatory power of student players' internal satisfaction with leadership was 34.9%, while that of external satisfaction with leadership was 52.6%, And leadership styles and satisfaction with leadership explained 25.3% of the coaching effectiveness, On the other hand, as far as internal satisfaction was concerned, "charisma", "personal consideration", conditional compensation" and "special management' were found significant. And as far as external satisfaction was concerned, such subcategories as "charisma" and "special management" were found significant. For coaching effectiveness, such subcategories as "charisma", "personal consideration", "conditional compensation" and "internal satisfaction" were found significant.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I.서론
• 1.연구의 필요성 및 목적
• 2.연구의 가설 및 변인
• II.연구방법
• 1.조사대상
• 2.측정도구
• 3.자료분석
• III.결과
• 1.기술통계
• 2.학급별 차이
• 3.경로분석 결과
• IV.논의
• V.결론
• 참고문헌
• ABSTRACT