RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      변환적ㆍ상통적 리더십이 스포츠 지도자의 지도 효율성에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of Coaches´ TransformationalㆍTransactional Leadership on Coaching Effectiveness

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3008547

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Effects of Coaches' Transformational · Transactional Leadership on Coaching Effectiveness
      The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of coaches' leadership styles on players' satisfaction with leadership and coaching effectiveness.
      Second, for high school players, two leadership styles' explanatory power of student players' internal satisfaction with leadership was 37.3%, while that of external satisfaction with leadership was 57.8%, And leadership styles and satisfaction with leadership explained 42.5% of the coaching effectiveness. On the other hand, as far as internal satisfaction was concerned, "charisma" and "personal consideration" conditional compensation" and "special management' were found significant. And as far as external satisfaction was concerned, such subcategories as "charisma", "personal consideration" "intellectual stimulation" and "special management" were found significant. For coaching effectiveness, such subcategories as "charisma", "personal consideration", "conditional compensation" and "external satisfaction" were found significant.
      Third, for college players, two leadership styles' explanatory power of student players' internal satisfaction with leadership was 35.1%, while that of external satisfaction with leadership was 48.8%, And leadership styles and satisfaction with leadership explained 15% of the coaching effectiveness. On the other hand, as far as internal satisfaction was concerned, "charisma" and "personal consideration" were found significant. And as far as external satisfaction was concerned, such subcategories as "charisma" and "special management" were found significant. For coaching effectiveness, such subcategories as "internal satisfaction" and "intellectual stimulation" were found significant.
      Fourth, for the total student players, two leadership styles' explanatory power of student players' internal satisfaction with leadership was 34.9%, while that of external satisfaction with leadership was 52.6%, And leadership styles and satisfaction with leadership explained 25.3% of the coaching effectiveness, On the other hand, as far as internal satisfaction was concerned, "charisma", "personal consideration", conditional compensation" and "special management' were found significant. And as far as external satisfaction was concerned, such subcategories as "charisma" and "special management" were found significant. For coaching effectiveness, such subcategories as "charisma", "personal consideration", "conditional compensation" and "internal satisfaction" were found significant.
      번역하기

      The Effects of Coaches' Transformational · Transactional Leadership on Coaching Effectiveness The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of coaches' leadership styles on players' satisfaction with leadership and coaching effectiveness. Sec...

      The Effects of Coaches' Transformational · Transactional Leadership on Coaching Effectiveness
      The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of coaches' leadership styles on players' satisfaction with leadership and coaching effectiveness.
      Second, for high school players, two leadership styles' explanatory power of student players' internal satisfaction with leadership was 37.3%, while that of external satisfaction with leadership was 57.8%, And leadership styles and satisfaction with leadership explained 42.5% of the coaching effectiveness. On the other hand, as far as internal satisfaction was concerned, "charisma" and "personal consideration" conditional compensation" and "special management' were found significant. And as far as external satisfaction was concerned, such subcategories as "charisma", "personal consideration" "intellectual stimulation" and "special management" were found significant. For coaching effectiveness, such subcategories as "charisma", "personal consideration", "conditional compensation" and "external satisfaction" were found significant.
      Third, for college players, two leadership styles' explanatory power of student players' internal satisfaction with leadership was 35.1%, while that of external satisfaction with leadership was 48.8%, And leadership styles and satisfaction with leadership explained 15% of the coaching effectiveness. On the other hand, as far as internal satisfaction was concerned, "charisma" and "personal consideration" were found significant. And as far as external satisfaction was concerned, such subcategories as "charisma" and "special management" were found significant. For coaching effectiveness, such subcategories as "internal satisfaction" and "intellectual stimulation" were found significant.
      Fourth, for the total student players, two leadership styles' explanatory power of student players' internal satisfaction with leadership was 34.9%, while that of external satisfaction with leadership was 52.6%, And leadership styles and satisfaction with leadership explained 25.3% of the coaching effectiveness, On the other hand, as far as internal satisfaction was concerned, "charisma", "personal consideration", conditional compensation" and "special management' were found significant. And as far as external satisfaction was concerned, such subcategories as "charisma" and "special management" were found significant. For coaching effectiveness, such subcategories as "charisma", "personal consideration", "conditional compensation" and "internal satisfaction" were found significant.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I.서론
      • 1.연구의 필요성 및 목적
      • 2.연구의 가설 및 변인
      • II.연구방법
      • 1.조사대상
      • I.서론
      • 1.연구의 필요성 및 목적
      • 2.연구의 가설 및 변인
      • II.연구방법
      • 1.조사대상
      • 2.측정도구
      • 3.자료분석
      • III.결과
      • 1.기술통계
      • 2.학급별 차이
      • 3.경로분석 결과
      • IV.논의
      • V.결론
      • 참고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼