RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      공무원 노사관계와 급여결정제도 = Research on the Pay Determination System in Public Officials’ Trade Union System - focused on Japanese System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100460447

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This thesis researches on the pay determination system in public officials’ trade union collective bargaining system. The pay of public official is straightly connected to national finance, so it is determined by control of National Congress. Moreover, the standard of public officials’ conditions of work is regulated by law and enforcement ordinance.
      How to harmonize these special characters in public officials’ pay determination system and service regulation system with public officials’ trade union collective bargaining system becomes conspicuous.
      Referring to public officials’ trade union collective bargaining system in advanced countries, the determination of pay has been done by Government or Neutral Commission. In Japan which is similar to korean law system and social-economic surroundings, the pay determination in public officials’ trade union collective bargaining system is done by Japan National Personnel Authority. And Japan National Personnel Authority is under an obligation to compare the pay level of public official to that of non-official and to give advise of pay-increase ratio to Congress.
      With restriction of national finance democracy and law-determination system in public officials’ working conditions, the neutral commission needs to compare the pay level of public official to that of non-official scientifically and the neutral Civil Service Commission needs to give advise of pay-increase ratio to Congress. The collective bargaining by public officials’ trade union with employer can be done on the details. And in these procedures the consultation with public officials’ trade union has to be regarded as important.
      번역하기

      This thesis researches on the pay determination system in public officials’ trade union collective bargaining system. The pay of public official is straightly connected to national finance, so it is determined by control of National Congress. Moreov...

      This thesis researches on the pay determination system in public officials’ trade union collective bargaining system. The pay of public official is straightly connected to national finance, so it is determined by control of National Congress. Moreover, the standard of public officials’ conditions of work is regulated by law and enforcement ordinance.
      How to harmonize these special characters in public officials’ pay determination system and service regulation system with public officials’ trade union collective bargaining system becomes conspicuous.
      Referring to public officials’ trade union collective bargaining system in advanced countries, the determination of pay has been done by Government or Neutral Commission. In Japan which is similar to korean law system and social-economic surroundings, the pay determination in public officials’ trade union collective bargaining system is done by Japan National Personnel Authority. And Japan National Personnel Authority is under an obligation to compare the pay level of public official to that of non-official and to give advise of pay-increase ratio to Congress.
      With restriction of national finance democracy and law-determination system in public officials’ working conditions, the neutral commission needs to compare the pay level of public official to that of non-official scientifically and the neutral Civil Service Commission needs to give advise of pay-increase ratio to Congress. The collective bargaining by public officials’ trade union with employer can be done on the details. And in these procedures the consultation with public officials’ trade union has to be regarded as important.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 공무원 노사관계 운영의 원칙 및 일본 공무원 노사관계의 개요
      • Ⅲ. 일본에서의 인사원 임금권고제도와 시사점
      • 〈Abstract〉
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 공무원 노사관계 운영의 원칙 및 일본 공무원 노사관계의 개요
      • Ⅲ. 일본에서의 인사원 임금권고제도와 시사점
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-04-27 학술지등록 한글명 : 노동법연구
      외국어명 : Labor Law Review
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.12 1.12 1.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.15 1.07 1.657 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼