RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      개정 해고법제의 주요 내용과 그 평가 = A Critical Review on the 2006 Dismissal Laws

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The main characteristic of the current amendment on dismissal laws is the introduction of mandatory deposit system for implementation and dismissal compensation system.
      This amendment can be evaluated in a positive manner on the ground that it ensures the effectiveness of relief order from the Labor Relations Commission and improves the elasticity of relief system.
      Especially, the amendment to notify a lay-off worker of the cause and time of dismissal in a written form is very desirable because there have been continued disputes between parties on the settlement of factual relation regarding the existence of dismissal measure.
      Despite this forward-looking amendment of the dismissal law, this paper tries to complement several insufficient aspects of the amendment.
      First, the diversification of relief method needs to be considered after taking the concept of constructive dismissal in British law into account.
      Second, we need to contemplate how to reinforce the reconciliation on dispute resolution process. Moreover, in the long run, the labor court needs to be introduced in order to improve the dismissal relief system.
      Third, dismissal conditions need to be stipulated in a statutory form in order to accept the principle of appropriate dismissal process and to rationally manage the interests between labor and management.
      Fourth, the period of dismissal notice needs to be adjusted in proportion to the length of service in order to make full use of the function of dismissal notice.
      Fifth, although the intension of resignation is declared, the revocation should be allowed within a certain period of time(for example, 7 days) in order to secure the legal stability.
      번역하기

      The main characteristic of the current amendment on dismissal laws is the introduction of mandatory deposit system for implementation and dismissal compensation system. This amendment can be evaluated in a positive manner on the ground that it ensu...

      The main characteristic of the current amendment on dismissal laws is the introduction of mandatory deposit system for implementation and dismissal compensation system.
      This amendment can be evaluated in a positive manner on the ground that it ensures the effectiveness of relief order from the Labor Relations Commission and improves the elasticity of relief system.
      Especially, the amendment to notify a lay-off worker of the cause and time of dismissal in a written form is very desirable because there have been continued disputes between parties on the settlement of factual relation regarding the existence of dismissal measure.
      Despite this forward-looking amendment of the dismissal law, this paper tries to complement several insufficient aspects of the amendment.
      First, the diversification of relief method needs to be considered after taking the concept of constructive dismissal in British law into account.
      Second, we need to contemplate how to reinforce the reconciliation on dispute resolution process. Moreover, in the long run, the labor court needs to be introduced in order to improve the dismissal relief system.
      Third, dismissal conditions need to be stipulated in a statutory form in order to accept the principle of appropriate dismissal process and to rationally manage the interests between labor and management.
      Fourth, the period of dismissal notice needs to be adjusted in proportion to the length of service in order to make full use of the function of dismissal notice.
      Fifth, although the intension of resignation is declared, the revocation should be allowed within a certain period of time(for example, 7 days) in order to secure the legal stability.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 해고법제 개정의 경위와 주요내용
      • Ⅲ. 개정법상 신설된 구제제도의 주요 내용 - 금전보상제와 이행강제금을 중심으로
      • Ⅳ. 해고제도 합리화 방안
      • Ⅴ. 결론 - 종합적 평가
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 해고법제 개정의 경위와 주요내용
      • Ⅲ. 개정법상 신설된 구제제도의 주요 내용 - 금전보상제와 이행강제금을 중심으로
      • Ⅳ. 해고제도 합리화 방안
      • Ⅴ. 결론 - 종합적 평가
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-04-27 학술지등록 한글명 : 노동법연구
      외국어명 : Labor Law Review
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.12 1.12 1.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.15 1.07 1.657 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼