RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      民法 第366條의 法定地上權 = Legal Superficies in Act366 of Civill Law

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76477714

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The main case of legal superficies in various situation is the superficies law in act 366 of civil law. The same owner of a land and a building can hold the right of employing the land for the purpose of the building as his/her own property right though the owner permits mortgage of either a land or a building. However, the other new owner who takes one of properties by the auction should take up the right of employing it as his/her own legal right. In this case the problem between a land owner and a building ower can occur. As a resulting of the auction that they have not intended before, they do not mention the agreement of making use of the separated properties such as ground right engagement contract or land lease contract.
      The building owner should get rid of the building when they cannot negotiate on the matter each other. Civil law provides act 366 for the right of the separated owner in order to avoid this kind of irrational dispute.
      The law guarantees the right of a building owner in using the land that belongs to the building, because the law interprets that the land owner has already intended to provide legal superficies for the building owner in case that the right of two properties should be separated by auction.
      This article studies the previous researches and iudgments related with the established conditions on legal superficies in act 366. The purpose of this article is to make a clear interpretation of the concept of legal superficies, and tries to apply it on the effectiveness in order to provide an appropriate solution in the area.
      번역하기

      The main case of legal superficies in various situation is the superficies law in act 366 of civil law. The same owner of a land and a building can hold the right of employing the land for the purpose of the building as his/her own property right thou...

      The main case of legal superficies in various situation is the superficies law in act 366 of civil law. The same owner of a land and a building can hold the right of employing the land for the purpose of the building as his/her own property right though the owner permits mortgage of either a land or a building. However, the other new owner who takes one of properties by the auction should take up the right of employing it as his/her own legal right. In this case the problem between a land owner and a building ower can occur. As a resulting of the auction that they have not intended before, they do not mention the agreement of making use of the separated properties such as ground right engagement contract or land lease contract.
      The building owner should get rid of the building when they cannot negotiate on the matter each other. Civil law provides act 366 for the right of the separated owner in order to avoid this kind of irrational dispute.
      The law guarantees the right of a building owner in using the land that belongs to the building, because the law interprets that the land owner has already intended to provide legal superficies for the building owner in case that the right of two properties should be separated by auction.
      This article studies the previous researches and iudgments related with the established conditions on legal superficies in act 366. The purpose of this article is to make a clear interpretation of the concept of legal superficies, and tries to apply it on the effectiveness in order to provide an appropriate solution in the area.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 成立要件
      • Ⅲ. 效果
      • Ⅳ. 맺음말
      • 【참고문헌】
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 成立要件
      • Ⅲ. 效果
      • Ⅳ. 맺음말
      • 【참고문헌】
      • 【Abstract】
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼