In the digital era, technical standards have emerged as key governance instruments that embody social values and power dynamics, as well as technical consensus. This study examines the dual implications of standardizatio...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109940238
2025
Korean
standards ; standardization ; human rights ; digital technologies ; internet protocol ; artificial intelligence ; economic security ; 표준 ; 표준화 ; 인권 ; 디지털 기술 ; 인터넷 프로토콜 ; 인공지능 ; 경제안보
KCI등재
학술저널
50-65(16쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
In the digital era, technical standards have emerged as key governance instruments that embody social values and power dynamics, as well as technical consensus. This study examines the dual implications of standardizatio...
In the digital era, technical standards have emerged as key governance instruments that embody social values and power dynamics, as well as technical consensus. This study examines the dual implications of standardization for human rights through a comparative analysis of two cases: China’s New IP proposal and the European Union (EU)’s artificial intelligence (AI) standardization initiatives, which have been expanding globally. Although New IP, led by China, emphasizes technical improvements to existing internet architecture, it also reflects political intentions to strengthen state control and expand censorship, raising serious concerns about potential human rights violations. In contrast, the EU’s standardization efforts, exemplified by the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, emphasized transparency and explainability. This represents an attempt to embed human rights principles in the design and governance of AI systems.
Through this comparison, the study demonstrates that technical standards can function either as authoritarian instruments that institutionalize surveillance and control, or as democratic tools that embed human rights principles into technological governance. Nevertheless, there are still significant limitations in effectively integrating human rights considerations into standardization processes. These include structural challenges such as limited civil society participation, cultural and professional gaps between technical experts and human rights advocates, and restricted involvement of Global South countries.
The study concludes by underscoring the need to strengthen human rights capacity within standard-setting organizations, expand meaningful participation of diverse stakeholders, and establish institutional mechanisms to address global imbalances. Such measures are essential for ensuring that digital technology standardization evolves as a process that genuinely integrates and protects human rights.
주요국의 국가표준과 국제표준 부합성 비교 분석 연구 : 탄소중립 이행 과정에서의 표준 활용 수준 분석
대학 신입생을 위한 실습형 인체 골격 해부학 교안 개발 및 적용
국내 원전 해체 대응을 위한 전력산업기술기준(KEPIC) 선원항 평가 기준 수립에 대한 연구
Investigating the Impact of Deregulation on the Ship’s materials Industry
[제18회 김옥길기념강좌] 인공지능, 감정, 휴머니즘(Human-Compatible Artificial Intelligence’)’
이화여자대학교 스튜어드 러셀누구나 할 수 있는 데이터 분석과 인공지능[Data Analysis and Artificial Intelligence for Everyone]
K-MOOC 인하공업전문대학 이세훈누구나 할 수 있는 데이터 분석과 인공지능[Data Analysis and Artificial Intelligence for Everyone]
K-MOOC 인하공업전문대학 이세훈인터넷프로토콜
안양대학교 최선완디지털미디어기술이해
우송대학교 고광일