RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      디지털 시대의 기술 표준화와 인권: 중국 New IP와 EU AI 표준화 사례를 중심으로 = Technology Standardization and Human Rights in the Digital Era: Cases of China’s New IP and EU AI Standardization

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109940238

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In the digital era, technical standards have emerged as key governance instruments that embody social values and power dynamics, as well as technical consensus. This study examines the dual implications of standardization for human rights through a comparative analysis of two cases: China’s New IP proposal and the European Union (EU)’s artificial intelligence (AI) standardization initiatives, which have been expanding globally. Although New IP, led by China, emphasizes technical improvements to existing internet architecture, it also reflects political intentions to strengthen state control and expand censorship, raising serious concerns about potential human rights violations. In contrast, the EU’s standardization efforts, exemplified by the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, emphasized transparency and explainability. This represents an attempt to embed human rights principles in the design and governance of AI systems.
      Through this comparison, the study demonstrates that technical standards can function either as authoritarian instruments that institutionalize surveillance and control, or as democratic tools that embed human rights principles into technological governance. Nevertheless, there are still significant limitations in effectively integrating human rights considerations into standardization processes. These include structural challenges such as limited civil society participation, cultural and professional gaps between technical experts and human rights advocates, and restricted involvement of Global South countries.
      The study concludes by underscoring the need to strengthen human rights capacity within standard-setting organizations, expand meaningful participation of diverse stakeholders, and establish institutional mechanisms to address global imbalances. Such measures are essential for ensuring that digital technology standardization evolves as a process that genuinely integrates and protects human rights.
      번역하기

      In the digital era, technical standards have emerged as key governance instruments that embody social values and power dynamics, as well as technical consensus. This study examines the dual implications of standardizatio...

      In the digital era, technical standards have emerged as key governance instruments that embody social values and power dynamics, as well as technical consensus. This study examines the dual implications of standardization for human rights through a comparative analysis of two cases: China’s New IP proposal and the European Union (EU)’s artificial intelligence (AI) standardization initiatives, which have been expanding globally. Although New IP, led by China, emphasizes technical improvements to existing internet architecture, it also reflects political intentions to strengthen state control and expand censorship, raising serious concerns about potential human rights violations. In contrast, the EU’s standardization efforts, exemplified by the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, emphasized transparency and explainability. This represents an attempt to embed human rights principles in the design and governance of AI systems.
      Through this comparison, the study demonstrates that technical standards can function either as authoritarian instruments that institutionalize surveillance and control, or as democratic tools that embed human rights principles into technological governance. Nevertheless, there are still significant limitations in effectively integrating human rights considerations into standardization processes. These include structural challenges such as limited civil society participation, cultural and professional gaps between technical experts and human rights advocates, and restricted involvement of Global South countries.
      The study concludes by underscoring the need to strengthen human rights capacity within standard-setting organizations, expand meaningful participation of diverse stakeholders, and establish institutional mechanisms to address global imbalances. Such measures are essential for ensuring that digital technology standardization evolves as a process that genuinely integrates and protects human rights.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼