RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      The insert and revolve technique: a novel approach for inserting cages during unilateral biportal endoscopic assisted fusion surgery for effective spinal alignment restoration

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109214977

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Study Design: Retrospective study.Purpose: This study aimed to propose a method of performing unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE)-assisted interbody cage insertion for fusion using the “insert and revolve” technique and analyze the clinico-radiological outcomes.Overview of Literature: UBE-assisted lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) is a rapidly evolving technique combining the advantages of minimally invasive technique with ease of learning. The limited size of cages was a result of the narrow insertion channel. We propose a technique in which large extreme lateral interbody fusion cages can be inserted through the same opening.Methods: This study included 104 patients who underwent ULIF using the “insert and revolve technique” between July 2019 and September 2022. The patients were followed up for at least 12 months postoperatively. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified McNab’s criteria. Changes in segmental lordosis (SL), intervertebral disc height (IVDH), segmental coronal alignment (SCA), cage subsidence, and fusion grade were evaluated at 6- and 12-month follow-up.Results: The VAS scores for leg and back pain and ODI score showed significant improvement. Based on the Macnab’s criteria, 97 patients showed excellent outcomes and seven demonstrated good outcomes at 12 months. The mean IVDH increased from 6.3±2 to 10±2.1 mm immediately after surgery and 10±1.1 mm at 6 months. SL improved from 9.3°±11.5° to 17.78°±8.1°, while SCA improved from 7.7°±2.1° to 3.4°±1.2° at 1 year. Moreover, 92 and 11 patients showed grade 1 and 2 fusion, respectively, according to the Bridwell grading at 1 year.Conclusions: The “insert and revolve technique” facilitates the successful insertion of large cages, contributing to the restoration of disc height and coronal and sagittal spinal correction with favorable fusion rates.
      번역하기

      Study Design: Retrospective study.Purpose: This study aimed to propose a method of performing unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE)-assisted interbody cage insertion for fusion using the “insert and revolve” technique and analyze the clinico-radiolo...

      Study Design: Retrospective study.Purpose: This study aimed to propose a method of performing unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE)-assisted interbody cage insertion for fusion using the “insert and revolve” technique and analyze the clinico-radiological outcomes.Overview of Literature: UBE-assisted lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) is a rapidly evolving technique combining the advantages of minimally invasive technique with ease of learning. The limited size of cages was a result of the narrow insertion channel. We propose a technique in which large extreme lateral interbody fusion cages can be inserted through the same opening.Methods: This study included 104 patients who underwent ULIF using the “insert and revolve technique” between July 2019 and September 2022. The patients were followed up for at least 12 months postoperatively. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified McNab’s criteria. Changes in segmental lordosis (SL), intervertebral disc height (IVDH), segmental coronal alignment (SCA), cage subsidence, and fusion grade were evaluated at 6- and 12-month follow-up.Results: The VAS scores for leg and back pain and ODI score showed significant improvement. Based on the Macnab’s criteria, 97 patients showed excellent outcomes and seven demonstrated good outcomes at 12 months. The mean IVDH increased from 6.3±2 to 10±2.1 mm immediately after surgery and 10±1.1 mm at 6 months. SL improved from 9.3°±11.5° to 17.78°±8.1°, while SCA improved from 7.7°±2.1° to 3.4°±1.2° at 1 year. Moreover, 92 and 11 patients showed grade 1 and 2 fusion, respectively, according to the Bridwell grading at 1 year.Conclusions: The “insert and revolve technique” facilitates the successful insertion of large cages, contributing to the restoration of disc height and coronal and sagittal spinal correction with favorable fusion rates.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Gatam AR, "Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion : a technical note and an outcome comparison with the conventional minimally invasive fusion" 13 : 229-239, 2021

      2 Leveque JA, "The impact of surgical approach on sagittal plane alignment in patients undergoing one-or two-level fusions for degenerative pathology : a multicenter radiographic evaluation 6 months following surgery" 164 : e311-e317, 2022

      3 Birkenmaier C, "The current state of endoscopic disc surgery : review of controlled studies comparing full-endoscopic procedures for disc herniations to standard procedures" 16 : 335-344, 2013

      4 Wang SJ, "Single transverseorientation cage via MIS-TLIF approach for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease : a technical note" 8 : 14154-14160, 2015

      5 Kepler CK, "Restoration of lordosis and disk height after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion" 4 : 15-20, 2012

      6 Jagannathan J, "Radiographic restoration of lumbar alignment after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion" 64 : 955-964, 2009

      7 Hwa Eum J, "Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis : a technical note and preliminary clinical results" 24 : 602-607, 2016

      8 Berven SH, "Operative management of degenerative scoliosis : an evidence-based approach to surgical strategies based on clinical and radiographic outcomes" 18 : 261-272, 2007

      9 이창규 ; Ho Yeol Zhang ; 박정윤, "Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a single interbody cage and a tubular retraction system : technical tips, and perioperative, radiologic and clinical outcomes" 48 : 219-224, 2010

      10 Heo DH, "Minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion with spinal endoscope assistance : technical note" 96 : 530-536, 2016

      1 Gatam AR, "Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion : a technical note and an outcome comparison with the conventional minimally invasive fusion" 13 : 229-239, 2021

      2 Leveque JA, "The impact of surgical approach on sagittal plane alignment in patients undergoing one-or two-level fusions for degenerative pathology : a multicenter radiographic evaluation 6 months following surgery" 164 : e311-e317, 2022

      3 Birkenmaier C, "The current state of endoscopic disc surgery : review of controlled studies comparing full-endoscopic procedures for disc herniations to standard procedures" 16 : 335-344, 2013

      4 Wang SJ, "Single transverseorientation cage via MIS-TLIF approach for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease : a technical note" 8 : 14154-14160, 2015

      5 Kepler CK, "Restoration of lordosis and disk height after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion" 4 : 15-20, 2012

      6 Jagannathan J, "Radiographic restoration of lumbar alignment after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion" 64 : 955-964, 2009

      7 Hwa Eum J, "Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis : a technical note and preliminary clinical results" 24 : 602-607, 2016

      8 Berven SH, "Operative management of degenerative scoliosis : an evidence-based approach to surgical strategies based on clinical and radiographic outcomes" 18 : 261-272, 2007

      9 이창규 ; Ho Yeol Zhang ; 박정윤, "Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a single interbody cage and a tubular retraction system : technical tips, and perioperative, radiologic and clinical outcomes" 48 : 219-224, 2010

      10 Heo DH, "Minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion with spinal endoscope assistance : technical note" 96 : 530-536, 2016

      11 Rasouli MR, "Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation" 2014 : CD010328-, 2014

      12 Elkan P, "Markers of inflammation and fibrinolysis in relation to outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation : a prospective study on 177 patients" 25 : 186-191, 2016

      13 Wang S, "MRI changes of adjacent segments after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF)and foraminal endoscopy : a case-control study" 101 : e31093-, 2022

      14 Harrop JS, "Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty" 33 : 1701-1707, 2008

      15 Derman PB, "Interbody fusion techniques in the surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis" 10 : 530-538, 2017

      16 Kepler CK, "Indirect foraminal decompression after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion" 16 : 329-333, 2012

      17 Heo DH, "Fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic technique : technical note and preliminary clinical results" 43 : E8-, 2017

      18 Wang MY, "Endoscopic minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion without general anesthesia : initial clinical experience with 1-year follow-up" 40 : E13-, 2016

      19 Ahlquist S, "Does approach matter? : a comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion" 18 : 1999-2008, 2018

      20 Tribus CB, "Degenerative lumbar scoliosis : evaluation and management" 11 : 174-183, 2003

      21 Park MK, "Correction to : Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion(ULIF)compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF) : 1-year follow-up" 42 : 763-, 2019

      22 이동엽 ; 심찬식 ; 안용 ; 최영근 ; 김호진 ; 이상호, "Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for recurrent disc herniation" 46 : 515-521, 2009

      23 Komp M, "Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique : a prospective, randomized, controlled study" 18 : 61-70, 2015

      24 Schwab FJ, "Adult scoliosis : a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis" 27 : 387-392, 2002

      25 Daffner SD, "Adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis" 32 : 77-82, 2003

      26 Hilibrand AS, "Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease : the consequences of spinal fusion?" 4 (4): 190S-194S, 2004

      27 Kwon BK, "A critical analysis of the literature regarding surgical approach and outcome for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis" 18 (18): S30-S40, 2005

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼