RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      우리나라 회계법인의 효율성 및 생산성 변화 = Efficiency and Productivity Change of Korean Accounting Firms

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104470237

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to analyze efficiency and productivity changes of Korean accounting firms for the 1997-2005 period. Further, we also examine efficiency change, pure efficiency change, scale efficiency change and technical change over time to address what factors have driven the productivity changes of Korean accounting firms. To explore our research question, we use DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) developed by Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes(1978) and Banker, Charnes, and Cooper(1984) and Malmquist productivity index developed by Fare, Grosskopf, Norris, and Zhang(1994). Total number of employees and total assets of accounting firms are used as input variables, and auditing revenue, taxation revenue, and management advisory service revenue are used as output variables. The main results of our paper are summarized as follows. First, our cross-sectional analysis in 2005 shows that the technical efficiency of Korean accounting firms averages 0.764, the pure technical efficiency 0,811, and the scale efficiency 0.944. Out of total 78 accounting firms, 50 firms indicate that they are under increasing returns to scale. Second, our time-series analysis demonstrates that yearly average technical efficiency decreased sharply in 2002 after the Korean Ministry of Finance and Economics loosened the establishment criteria for new accounting firms. This decrease in the average technical efficiency was caused by Non-Big4 accounting firms, not by Big4 accounting firms. Third, our Malmquist productivity index analysis reveals that overall yearly productivity improves over time because technical change has made a positive impact on the productivity changes of Korean accounting firms over the 1997-2005 period. However, the productivity improvement is smaller for the period in which the new establishment criteria for new accounting firms have been applied since 2001.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to analyze efficiency and productivity changes of Korean accounting firms for the 1997-2005 period. Further, we also examine efficiency change, pure efficiency change, scale efficiency change and technical change over time...

      The purpose of this study is to analyze efficiency and productivity changes of Korean accounting firms for the 1997-2005 period. Further, we also examine efficiency change, pure efficiency change, scale efficiency change and technical change over time to address what factors have driven the productivity changes of Korean accounting firms. To explore our research question, we use DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) developed by Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes(1978) and Banker, Charnes, and Cooper(1984) and Malmquist productivity index developed by Fare, Grosskopf, Norris, and Zhang(1994). Total number of employees and total assets of accounting firms are used as input variables, and auditing revenue, taxation revenue, and management advisory service revenue are used as output variables. The main results of our paper are summarized as follows. First, our cross-sectional analysis in 2005 shows that the technical efficiency of Korean accounting firms averages 0.764, the pure technical efficiency 0,811, and the scale efficiency 0.944. Out of total 78 accounting firms, 50 firms indicate that they are under increasing returns to scale. Second, our time-series analysis demonstrates that yearly average technical efficiency decreased sharply in 2002 after the Korean Ministry of Finance and Economics loosened the establishment criteria for new accounting firms. This decrease in the average technical efficiency was caused by Non-Big4 accounting firms, not by Big4 accounting firms. Third, our Malmquist productivity index analysis reveals that overall yearly productivity improves over time because technical change has made a positive impact on the productivity changes of Korean accounting firms over the 1997-2005 period. However, the productivity improvement is smaller for the period in which the new establishment criteria for new accounting firms have been applied since 2001.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "회계법인의 투입요소와 총수익의 관계에 관한 연구" 26 (26): 83-107, 2001

      2 "한국생명보험산업의 효율성 평가와 비효율성 원인의 규명" 20 (20): 321-354, 2000

      3 "우리나라 회계법인의 효율성 및 생산성 변화" 한국생산성학회 161-187, 2007

      4 "우리나라 회계법인의 생산성" 한국회계학회 751-768, 2006

      5 "우리나라 은행산업의 생산성 변화요인 : Malmquist 방법론의 적용" 4 (4): 85-122, 1999

      6 "외환위기 전후의 은행산업 효율성 비교에 관한 연구" 22 (22): 21-46, 2004

      7 "사업연도부터 2005 사업연도까지 사업연도별 회계법인 사업보고서 분석" 1997

      8 "공인회계사법 중 개정법률안 검토보고" 재정경제위원회 2001

      9 "감사인의 유형과 감사품질 : 감사보수와 시간을 중심으로" 23 (23): 49-75, 1998

      10 "감사서비스의 생산과 피감사회사의 특성" 28 (28): 609-635, 1999

      1 "회계법인의 투입요소와 총수익의 관계에 관한 연구" 26 (26): 83-107, 2001

      2 "한국생명보험산업의 효율성 평가와 비효율성 원인의 규명" 20 (20): 321-354, 2000

      3 "우리나라 회계법인의 효율성 및 생산성 변화" 한국생산성학회 161-187, 2007

      4 "우리나라 회계법인의 생산성" 한국회계학회 751-768, 2006

      5 "우리나라 은행산업의 생산성 변화요인 : Malmquist 방법론의 적용" 4 (4): 85-122, 1999

      6 "외환위기 전후의 은행산업 효율성 비교에 관한 연구" 22 (22): 21-46, 2004

      7 "사업연도부터 2005 사업연도까지 사업연도별 회계법인 사업보고서 분석" 1997

      8 "공인회계사법 중 개정법률안 검토보고" 재정경제위원회 2001

      9 "감사인의 유형과 감사품질 : 감사보수와 시간을 중심으로" 23 (23): 49-75, 1998

      10 "감사서비스의 생산과 피감사회사의 특성" 28 (28): 609-635, 1999

      11 "technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries" 66-83, 1994

      12 "in The Measurement of Productive Efficiency" Oxford University Press 160-194, 1993

      13 "Theory of Cost and Production Functions" Princeton University Press Princeton 1970

      14 "The public accounting industry production function" 35 : 255-281, 2003

      15 "The production of audit services Evidence from a major public accounting firm Journal of Accounting Research" 241-261, 1994

      16 "The measurement of productive efficiency Journal of the Royal Statistical Society" 253-281, 1957

      17 "The mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis in The Measurement of Productive Efficiency" Oxford University Press 120-159, 1993

      18 "The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input" eco (eco): 1393-1414, 1982

      19 "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis" 1078-1092, 1984

      20 "Productivity development in Swedish hospitals" Southern Illinois University illi (illi): 89-3, 1989

      21 "Productivity change, technical progress, and relative efficiency change in the public accounting industry" 51 (51): 291-304, 2005

      22 "Product differentiation in auditing Auditor choice in the market for unseasoned new issues" 1987

      23 "Measuring production efficiency in a not-for-profit setting" 66-68, 1993

      24 "Measuring production efficiency in a non-profit setting" 505-519, 1990

      25 "Measuring hospital efficiency with frontier cost function Journal of Health Economics" 255-280, 1994

      26 "Measuring efficiency of decision making units European Journal of Operations Research" 429-444, 1978

      27 "Measuring cost efficiency in banking Journal of Econometrics" 229-245, 1990

      28 "Industry differences in the production of audit services A Journal of Practice and Theory" 128-142, 1994

      29 "Efficiency of financial institutions : International survey and directions for future research" 98 : 175-212, 1997

      30 "Economies of scale and scope in the finnish non-life insurance industry" 759-779, 1997

      31 "Divestiture of Nippon telegraph and telephone" 42 : 1326-1351, 1996

      32 "Deterministic parametric and nonparametric estimation of efficiency in service production Journal of Econometrics" 213-227, 1990

      33 "Benchmarking CPA firms for productivity and efficiency" 66 : 64-66, 1996

      34 "Auditor brand name reputation and industry specialization" 20 : 297-322, 1995

      35 "A study of technical efficiencies of CPA firms in Taiwan" 3 (3): 27-44, 2000

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-06-07 학술지명변경 한글명 : 생산성논집 -> 생산성연구: 국제융합학술지
      외국어명 : Productivity Review -> Productivity Research: An International Interdisciplinary Journal
      KCI등재
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-12-17 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Productivity Review KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 生産性論集 -> 생산성논집 KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.78 0.78 0.8
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.77 0.76 1.06 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼