새로운 시신경 테 너비의 규칙을 이용한 정상안과 녹내장안의 구별

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic ability of the modified ISNT rule (disc rim thickness of the smaller of inferior and superior > the larger of nasal and temporal) for normal and glaucomatous eyes compared to the classic ISNT rule (disc rim thickness of inferior > superior > nasal > temporal). Methods: Color stereo optic disc photographs of 113 normal subjects and 108 open angle glaucoma patients with early and moderate stage were morphometrically evaluated. The classic ISNT rule and the modified ISNT rule were assessed by masked evaluation of disc photographs at the 3, 6, 9 and 12 o’clock positions. Results: Among normal subjects, 58 of 113 eyes (51.3%) were normal and in open angle glaucoma patients, 104 of 108 eyes (96.3%) were abnormal with the classic ISNT rule. Among normal subjects, 98 of 113 eyes (94.2%) were normal and in open angle glaucoma patients, 102 of 108 eyes (94.4%) were abnormal with the modified ISNT rule. The modified ISNT rule was more accurate than the classic ISNT rule in terms of Cohen’s Kappa analysis used for discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes. Conclusions: The modified ISNT rule is useful for differentiating between normal and glaucomatous optic nerves and easily applied in clinical practice. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2014;55(1):93-101

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Pogrebniak AE, "Violation of the ISNT rule in Nonglaucomatous pediatric optic disc cupping" 51 : 890-895, 2010

2 Garway-Heath DF, "Vertical cup/disc ratio in relation to optic disc size: its value in the assessment of the glaucoma suspect" 82 : 1118-1124, 1998

3 Per OL, "Use of the ISNT rule for optic disc evaluation in 40 to 79 year old" 3 : 16-22, 2010

4 Quigley HA, "The size and shape of the optic disc in normal human eyes" 108 : 51-57, 1990

5 Foster PJ, "The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys" 86 : 238-242, 2002

6 Morgan JE, "The accuracy of the inferior>superior>nasal>temporal neuroretinal rim area rule for diagnosing glaucomatous optic disc damage" 119 : 723-730, 2012

7 Harizman N, "The ISNT rule and differentiation of normal from glaucomatous eyes" 124 : 1579-1583, 2006

8 Vijaya L, "Prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in an urban south Indian population and comparison with a rural population. The Chennai Glaucoma Study" 115 : 648-54.e1-, 2008

9 Vongphanit J, "Population prevalence of tilted optic disks and the relationship of this sign to refractive error" 133 : 679-685, 2002

10 Sekhar GC, "Planimetric optic disc parameters in normal eyes: a population-based study in South India" 49 : 19-23, 2001

11 Jonas JB, "Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes" 29 : 1151-1158, 1988

12 Arvind H, "Neural rim characteristics of healthy South Indians: the Chennai Glaucoma Study" 49 : 3457-3464, 2008

13 Sihota R, "Is the ISNT rule violated in early primary open-angle glaucoma--a scanning laser tomography study" 22 : 819-824, 2008

14 Budde WM, "Influence of optic disc size on neuroretinal rim shape in healthy eyes" 9 : 357-362, 2000

15 Bowd C, "Evaluating the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. I: Clinical examination and photographic methods" 15 : 194-205, 2000

16 Kee C, "Effect of optic disc size or age on evaluation of optic disc variables" 81 : 1046-1049, 1997

17 Jonas JB, "Comparison of measurements of neuroretinal rim area between confocal laser scanning tomography and planimetry of photographs" 82 : 362-366, 1998

18 Caprioli J, "Clinical evaluation of the optic nerve in glaucoma" 92 : 589-641, 1994

19 Anderson DR, "Automated static perimetry" Mosby 152-153, 1999