RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    변호사법상 법무법인ㆍ법무법인(유한)ㆍ법무조합의 책임에 관한 연구 = A Study on Liabilities of Law firmㆍLaw firm (limited-liability)ㆍ Lawyers Union based on Attorney Law

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104723929

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Korea has classification law offices; 1)individual law office, 2)law firm, 3)law firm (limited-liability) and 4)lawyers union. The law office operated by an individual lawyer, used to form the mainstream. Thereafter, with oppression to open legal market, the law firm system was first introduced by revision of Attorney Law on December 31, 1982. Hence, it became possible for lawyers to establish law firms in order to perform their duties in systematically and professionally. However, if a law firm cannot complete the discharge of debt with their assets, the attorney members of the firm will burden on joint liability.
    This liability-system became an obstacle for law firms in ways to specialize and enlarge. Thus, establishment of systems of (limited-liability) law firms and Lawyers Union on January 27, 2005 on Attorney law, which was to reinforce international competitiveness and provide specialized legal services, induced enlargement and specialization of law offices. Enlargement of law offices, similarly, caused plenty of problems on its management and increased problematic possibilities of delegated cases related to compensation liability.
    Liabilities on law firms and attorney members carry problems; ①occurrence of liability during their management of the firms, ②delegated cases related to compensation liability. If the firm’s representative lawyer has affected loss about the management of the firm, he serves compensation liability with the firm. Further, if a lawyer member is in charge of compensation liability related to delegated case, the attorney is responsible for damages with the law firm. Compensation liability that had occurred during process which the representative lawyer worked as the lawyer in charge, is also included.
    Liabilities of the members of the limited-liability firms are basically on the ceiling by investment amount. The lawyer in charge of a delegated case is responsible to compensate for his client’s total damage with the limited-liability firms. Besides, the members who directed and supervised the case-accepted lawyer immediately shall compensate for the damages. The member of Lawyers Union has to compensate for the damage by loss-sharing ratio when debt is raised. This debt is the one that had occurred among the union under its operation.
    In principle, the lawyer who accepted the case is liable for the damages in accordance with delegated case. The member lawyers who directed and supervised the case-accepted lawyer immediately shall compensate for the damages. In case, they can prove their direction and supervision were not neglected, however, they will receive the immunity. When compensation liability has occurred related to delegated case, the other lawyer members or lawyers union are responsible for limitation on the scope of the union’s substances.
    번역하기

    Korea has classification law offices; 1)individual law office, 2)law firm, 3)law firm (limited-liability) and 4)lawyers union. The law office operated by an individual lawyer, used to form the mainstream. Thereafter, with oppression to open legal mark...

    Korea has classification law offices; 1)individual law office, 2)law firm, 3)law firm (limited-liability) and 4)lawyers union. The law office operated by an individual lawyer, used to form the mainstream. Thereafter, with oppression to open legal market, the law firm system was first introduced by revision of Attorney Law on December 31, 1982. Hence, it became possible for lawyers to establish law firms in order to perform their duties in systematically and professionally. However, if a law firm cannot complete the discharge of debt with their assets, the attorney members of the firm will burden on joint liability.
    This liability-system became an obstacle for law firms in ways to specialize and enlarge. Thus, establishment of systems of (limited-liability) law firms and Lawyers Union on January 27, 2005 on Attorney law, which was to reinforce international competitiveness and provide specialized legal services, induced enlargement and specialization of law offices. Enlargement of law offices, similarly, caused plenty of problems on its management and increased problematic possibilities of delegated cases related to compensation liability.
    Liabilities on law firms and attorney members carry problems; ①occurrence of liability during their management of the firms, ②delegated cases related to compensation liability. If the firm’s representative lawyer has affected loss about the management of the firm, he serves compensation liability with the firm. Further, if a lawyer member is in charge of compensation liability related to delegated case, the attorney is responsible for damages with the law firm. Compensation liability that had occurred during process which the representative lawyer worked as the lawyer in charge, is also included.
    Liabilities of the members of the limited-liability firms are basically on the ceiling by investment amount. The lawyer in charge of a delegated case is responsible to compensate for his client’s total damage with the limited-liability firms. Besides, the members who directed and supervised the case-accepted lawyer immediately shall compensate for the damages. The member of Lawyers Union has to compensate for the damage by loss-sharing ratio when debt is raised. This debt is the one that had occurred among the union under its operation.
    In principle, the lawyer who accepted the case is liable for the damages in accordance with delegated case. The member lawyers who directed and supervised the case-accepted lawyer immediately shall compensate for the damages. In case, they can prove their direction and supervision were not neglected, however, they will receive the immunity. When compensation liability has occurred related to delegated case, the other lawyer members or lawyers union are responsible for limitation on the scope of the union’s substances.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이철송, "회사법강의" 박영사 2009

    2 정찬형, "회사법강의" 박영사 2003

    3 대한변호사협회, "판례ㆍ선례 변호사법 축조해설" 대한변호사협회 2009

    4 이은영, "채권각론" 박영사 2000

    5 이시윤, "신민사소송법" 박영사 2009

    6 송덕수, "신민법강의" 박영사 2009

    7 엄동섭, "변호사책임론" 소화 1998

    8 김종윤, "변호사책임과 보험" 능화드림 2005

    9 이상수, "법조윤리의 이론과 실제" 서강대학교 출판부 2009

    10 정형근, "법조윤리강의" 박영사 2010

    1 이철송, "회사법강의" 박영사 2009

    2 정찬형, "회사법강의" 박영사 2003

    3 대한변호사협회, "판례ㆍ선례 변호사법 축조해설" 대한변호사협회 2009

    4 이은영, "채권각론" 박영사 2000

    5 이시윤, "신민사소송법" 박영사 2009

    6 송덕수, "신민법강의" 박영사 2009

    7 엄동섭, "변호사책임론" 소화 1998

    8 김종윤, "변호사책임과 보험" 능화드림 2005

    9 이상수, "법조윤리의 이론과 실제" 서강대학교 출판부 2009

    10 정형근, "법조윤리강의" 박영사 2010

    11 서울대학교 법과대학, "법률가의 윤리와 책임" 박영사 2007

    12 송상현, "민사소송법" 박영사 2008

    13 곽윤직, "민법주해, 제X권 채권(3)" 박영사 1995

    14 곽윤직, "민법주해, 제XVI권 채권(9)" 박영사 1997

    15 김재원, "미국의 법학교육과 변호사의 윤리" 도서출판 정법 2007

    16 천경훈, "미국 로펌의 조직형태에 관한 소고" 37 : 2007

    17 高中正彦, "辯護士法槪說" 三省堂 2006

    18 박상근, "辯護士法中改正法律案 中 共同法律事務所制度改善案의 考察" 법학연구소 45 (45): 67-96, 2004

    19 塚原英治, "法曹の倫理と責任" 現代人文社 2005

    20 Schwartz, "Problems In Legal Ethics" Thomson West 2007

    21 Ronald E. Mallen, "Legal malpractice(I), (II)" 1989

    22 Ronald D. Rotunada, "LEGAL ETHICS" Thomson West 2007

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.14 1.14 1.17
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.05 0.94 1.239 0.25
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼