RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      「のは · のを · のが」における代名詞『の』の有様 = [no/wa, no/ga, no/wo] syntactic pronoun

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101548960

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      [o/wa, no/ga, no/wo] all constructions had a degree higher than a pronoun of appearance of the complementizer, no/wa except for a construction, no/ga,, no/wo,, it can see a construction being used overwhelmingly as complementizer.
      It was analyzed in syntactic way. no/wa there was difference between a few frequencies, but the pronoun which receives the person, time and the location by a construction found out that it’s used freely. Next, no/ga,, the person, time and the location compared by a construction, and had an occurring frequency higher than a complementizer in turn for few pronouns for the pronoun occurring frequency, but the pronoun which shows a place was low relatively. But it’s a pronoun, no/ga, a construction and the semantic restrictions don’t operate to show a construction the person, time and the location.
      It’s last, no/wo,, the construction is different from two constructions above-mentioned, no/war and, no/ga”, it’s a complementizer that it’s maine like a construction or but apparent, it’s so overwhelming that there is no comparison when the occurring frequency is seen, no/wo, there were few pronouns for a construction. This, no/wo, to indicate a pronoun by a construction, anyway, it’s with the place which isn’t taken.
      번역하기

      [o/wa, no/ga, no/wo] all constructions had a degree higher than a pronoun of appearance of the complementizer, no/wa except for a construction, no/ga,, no/wo,, it can see a construction being used overwhelmingly as complementizer. It was analyzed i...

      [o/wa, no/ga, no/wo] all constructions had a degree higher than a pronoun of appearance of the complementizer, no/wa except for a construction, no/ga,, no/wo,, it can see a construction being used overwhelmingly as complementizer.
      It was analyzed in syntactic way. no/wa there was difference between a few frequencies, but the pronoun which receives the person, time and the location by a construction found out that it’s used freely. Next, no/ga,, the person, time and the location compared by a construction, and had an occurring frequency higher than a complementizer in turn for few pronouns for the pronoun occurring frequency, but the pronoun which shows a place was low relatively. But it’s a pronoun, no/ga, a construction and the semantic restrictions don’t operate to show a construction the person, time and the location.
      It’s last, no/wo,, the construction is different from two constructions above-mentioned, no/war and, no/ga”, it’s a complementizer that it’s maine like a construction or but apparent, it’s so overwhelming that there is no comparison when the occurring frequency is seen, no/wo, there were few pronouns for a construction. This, no/wo, to indicate a pronoun by a construction, anyway, it’s with the place which isn’t taken.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. はじめに
      • 2. 『の』構文の様相
      • 3. 代名詞『の』の意味類型
      • 4. 結果
      • 參考文獻
      • 1. はじめに
      • 2. 『の』構文の様相
      • 3. 代名詞『の』の意味類型
      • 4. 結果
      • 參考文獻
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 橋本 修, "「の」補文の統語的・意味的性質" 筑波大学文藝・言語学系 101-112, 1994

      2 佐治圭三, "「の」の本質―「こと」「もの」との対比からー" 明治書院 2 : 5-14, 1993

      3 山口佳也, "「のだ」の文とその仲間" 三省堂  11-34, 2012

      4 国立国語研究所の, "現代書き言葉均衡コーパス"

      5 大島資生, "朝倉日本語講座-文法Ⅰ" 朝倉書店 90-108, 2003

      6 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅱ" くろしお 260-298, 1984

      7 三原健一, "新日本語の統語構造" 松柏社  255-258, 2006

      8 工藤真由美, "国文学 解釈と鑑賞" 東京大学出版 45-101, 1985

      9 "yahoo.co.jp"

      10 "ninjal.ac.jp/corpus_center/bccwj"

      1 橋本 修, "「の」補文の統語的・意味的性質" 筑波大学文藝・言語学系 101-112, 1994

      2 佐治圭三, "「の」の本質―「こと」「もの」との対比からー" 明治書院 2 : 5-14, 1993

      3 山口佳也, "「のだ」の文とその仲間" 三省堂  11-34, 2012

      4 国立国語研究所の, "現代書き言葉均衡コーパス"

      5 大島資生, "朝倉日本語講座-文法Ⅰ" 朝倉書店 90-108, 2003

      6 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅱ" くろしお 260-298, 1984

      7 三原健一, "新日本語の統語構造" 松柏社  255-258, 2006

      8 工藤真由美, "国文学 解釈と鑑賞" 東京大学出版 45-101, 1985

      9 "yahoo.co.jp"

      10 "ninjal.ac.jp/corpus_center/bccwj"

      11 "google.com"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-06-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> 日本硏究 KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.41 0.41 0.34
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.31 0.28 0.746 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼