Yoon, Eun Kyung. 2006. A Study on Modality in Korean -Modal endings ‘-eulrae(-(으)ㄹ래)’ and ‘-eulge(-(으)ㄹ게)’. The Language and Culture 2-2: 41-63. This paper examined the grammatical category of modality in Korean. It is not an ea...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104678536
2006
Korean
학술저널
41-63(23쪽)
15
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Yoon, Eun Kyung. 2006. A Study on Modality in Korean -Modal endings ‘-eulrae(-(으)ㄹ래)’ and ‘-eulge(-(으)ㄹ게)’. The Language and Culture 2-2: 41-63. This paper examined the grammatical category of modality in Korean. It is not an ea...
Yoon, Eun Kyung. 2006. A Study on Modality in Korean -Modal endings ‘-eulrae(-(으)ㄹ래)’ and ‘-eulge(-(으)ㄹ게)’. The Language and Culture 2-2: 41-63. This paper examined the grammatical category of modality in Korean. It is not an easy work for adult foreign learners of Korean to learn every single modal endings in their utterance. Even it is not clear-cut for Korean teachers to teach how to use Korean modal endings. Native speakers of Korean do not have to learn it since they can intuitively acquire the notion of the modality. In light of this, the main purpose of this study is to analyse the modality in Korean. The modality is defined as a grammatical form of the quality or state in question. These include the assertion or denial of any degree or manner of affect, belief, certainty, desire, obligation, possibility, or probability on the part of the utterer. The notion of the modality was classified as epistemic modality and deontic modality. The epistemic modality was effectively described through the literature review for teaching Korean as a Foreign Language. The deontic modality, however, was not sufficiently accounted for. Therefore, what is also discussed is the distinction of ‘-eulrae’ and ‘-eulge’ to better understand for the deontic modality. The empirical study was performed through the corpus of KAIST. From the data, a total of 602 tokens was acquired: 301 tokens for ‘-eulrae’ and ‘-eulge’, respectively. The most important findings of this study were that ‘-eulrae’ has the functional meaning of [suggestions](50.5%), [threat](19%), and [desire](13%), Otherwise, the results revealed that ‘-eulge’ has the meaning of [promise] (80%) and [one’s will for here and now](20%).
(Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
접속부사의 한국어 교육학적 접근 -‘그러-’형의 접속 부사 중 양보의 접속부사를 중심으로-
의지 표현들의 의지 정도성 비교 -‘-겠어요’,’-(으)ㄹ거예요’,’-(으)ㄹ래요’,’-(으)ㄹ게요’를 중심으로 -
한국어 양태 표현 연구 - 종결어미 ‘-(으)ㄹ래, -(으)ㄹ게’를 대상으로 -
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2019-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2016-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2015-12-01 | 등재 | 등재후보로 하락 (기타) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.9 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.9 | 0.85 | 1.159 | 0.41 |