RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      소리의 종류와 크기에 따른 일과성 청력 역치 상승과 회복의 차이 = Differences in Temporary Threshold Shift and Recovery Patterns Depending on Sound Type and Pressure

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107196331

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Objective: This study aimed to investigate the differences in temporary threshold shift (TTS) and recovery patterns according to different types of sound and volume.
      Methods: TTS and recovery patterns were assessed for eight students after 30-minute exposure to both 70.0 dB and 90.0 dB of factory noise (noise) as well as music. TTS was measured before exposure and two minutes post exposure, and recovery patterns were evaluated every 10 minutes for one hour. The subjects performed activities of daily life and sleeping times as usual but taking drugs or drinking alcohol were prohibited. The experiment was repeated three times with an interval of at least 16 hours. ANOVA and T-test were carried out using SPSS 19.0 for Windows.
      Results: The hearing threshold of all subjects before exposure was less than 30 dB at all frequencies. Mean TTSs of 70 dB noise and 90 dB noise exposure were 0.14 and 4.48 dB (p<0.001). Meanwhile, the difference in music was insignificant (-0.63 dB and 0.55 dB, p=0.063). A significance in the difference was also found between the mean TTS of music and noise exposure, more obviously at 90.0 dB (p<0.001) than at 70 dB (p=0.232). The TTS differences were found frequency-wise in terms of sound type. Mean TTS by frequency was higher at 4,000 and 6,000 Hz than at other frequencies, and higher in noise than music at the same sound pressure. The TTS difference in each frequency between both sound types was significant at 90 dB (p<0.001). Subjects mostly recovered from TTS in one hour after exposure, but not with 90 dB-noise exposure.
      Conclusion: TTS and recovery patterns were different depending on the sound type. When exposed to factory noise, TTS was greater and recovery time was longer compared to music at the same sound pressure. These results suggested that the difference in cognitive processes and psychological factors according to the type of sound causes a change in TTS and recovery.
      번역하기

      Objective: This study aimed to investigate the differences in temporary threshold shift (TTS) and recovery patterns according to different types of sound and volume. Methods: TTS and recovery patterns were assessed for eight students after 30-minute e...

      Objective: This study aimed to investigate the differences in temporary threshold shift (TTS) and recovery patterns according to different types of sound and volume.
      Methods: TTS and recovery patterns were assessed for eight students after 30-minute exposure to both 70.0 dB and 90.0 dB of factory noise (noise) as well as music. TTS was measured before exposure and two minutes post exposure, and recovery patterns were evaluated every 10 minutes for one hour. The subjects performed activities of daily life and sleeping times as usual but taking drugs or drinking alcohol were prohibited. The experiment was repeated three times with an interval of at least 16 hours. ANOVA and T-test were carried out using SPSS 19.0 for Windows.
      Results: The hearing threshold of all subjects before exposure was less than 30 dB at all frequencies. Mean TTSs of 70 dB noise and 90 dB noise exposure were 0.14 and 4.48 dB (p<0.001). Meanwhile, the difference in music was insignificant (-0.63 dB and 0.55 dB, p=0.063). A significance in the difference was also found between the mean TTS of music and noise exposure, more obviously at 90.0 dB (p<0.001) than at 70 dB (p=0.232). The TTS differences were found frequency-wise in terms of sound type. Mean TTS by frequency was higher at 4,000 and 6,000 Hz than at other frequencies, and higher in noise than music at the same sound pressure. The TTS difference in each frequency between both sound types was significant at 90 dB (p<0.001). Subjects mostly recovered from TTS in one hour after exposure, but not with 90 dB-noise exposure.
      Conclusion: TTS and recovery patterns were different depending on the sound type. When exposed to factory noise, TTS was greater and recovery time was longer compared to music at the same sound pressure. These results suggested that the difference in cognitive processes and psychological factors according to the type of sound causes a change in TTS and recovery.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김성철, "소음이 과제수행에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 대한인간공학회 29 (29): 121-128, 2010

      2 신현주, "들기/내리기 작업 시 소음과 배경음악이 몸통근육 피로도에 미치는 영향" 대한인간공학회 27 (27): 15-22, 2008

      3 Choi MJ, "The Influence of Meditation Music and Noise on Frontal Cortex" 669-701, 2001

      4 Lehnhardt, E., "The C5-dip: Its interpretation in the light of generally known physiological concepts" 6 (6): 86-95, 2009

      5 Hellström P, "Temporary threshold shift induced by music" 48 : 87-94, 1998

      6 Strasser H, "Temporary Hearing Threshold Shifts and Restitution after Energy-Equivalent Exposures to Industrial Noise and Classical Music" 5 : 75-84, 2003

      7 Yoshida N, "Sound conditioning reduces noise-induced permanent threshold shift in mice" 148 (148): 213-219, 2000

      8 Niu X, "Protecting against noise by sound Conditioning" 250 : 115-118, 2002

      9 OSHA, "OSHA safety and health standards. 29 CFR 1910.95" Occupational Safety and Health Administration

      10 Arlinger SD, "Normal hearing threshold levels in the low-frequency range determined by an insert earphone" 90 : 2411-2414, 1991

      1 김성철, "소음이 과제수행에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 대한인간공학회 29 (29): 121-128, 2010

      2 신현주, "들기/내리기 작업 시 소음과 배경음악이 몸통근육 피로도에 미치는 영향" 대한인간공학회 27 (27): 15-22, 2008

      3 Choi MJ, "The Influence of Meditation Music and Noise on Frontal Cortex" 669-701, 2001

      4 Lehnhardt, E., "The C5-dip: Its interpretation in the light of generally known physiological concepts" 6 (6): 86-95, 2009

      5 Hellström P, "Temporary threshold shift induced by music" 48 : 87-94, 1998

      6 Strasser H, "Temporary Hearing Threshold Shifts and Restitution after Energy-Equivalent Exposures to Industrial Noise and Classical Music" 5 : 75-84, 2003

      7 Yoshida N, "Sound conditioning reduces noise-induced permanent threshold shift in mice" 148 (148): 213-219, 2000

      8 Niu X, "Protecting against noise by sound Conditioning" 250 : 115-118, 2002

      9 OSHA, "OSHA safety and health standards. 29 CFR 1910.95" Occupational Safety and Health Administration

      10 Arlinger SD, "Normal hearing threshold levels in the low-frequency range determined by an insert earphone" 90 : 2411-2414, 1991

      11 Choi SH, "Noise-Induced Temporary Threshold Shift and its Recovery in Industry" 8 (8): 320-329, 1996

      12 Zhao F, "Music exposure and hearing disorders : An overview" 49 : 54-64, 2010

      13 Mark Reybrouck, "Music and Noise: Same or Different? What Our Body Tells Us" Frontiers Media SA 10 : 1153-, 2019

      14 Myung Gu Kim, "Hearing Threshold of Korean Adolescents Associated with the Use of Personal Music Players" 연세대학교의과대학 50 (50): 771-776, 2009

      15 Halevi-Katz DN, "Exposure to music and noise-induced hearing loss(NIHL)among professional pop/rock/jazz musicians" 17 : 158-164, 2015

      16 Barlow C, "Evidence of Noise-induced Hearing Loss in Young People Studying Popular Music" 26 : 96-101, 2011

      17 Wang, H, "Dynamic changes in hair cell stereocilia and cochlear transduction after noise exposure" 409 (409): 616-621, 2011

      18 Kraaijenga VJC, "Association of behavior with noise-induced hearing loss among attendees of an outdoor music festival. A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial" 144 : 490-497, 2018

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-03-06 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국산업위생학회지 -> 한국산업보건학회지 KCI등재
      2014-12-19 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국산업위생학회 -> 한국산업보건학회 KCI등재
      2014-08-14 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Society Of Occupational And Environmental Hygiene -> Korean Industrial Hygiene Association KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.24 0.24 0.25
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.25 0.24 0.389 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼