항공 사고에서의 과실 이론 -일본 항공 사고 판례를 중심으로- = Negligence theory of Aviation accident with reference to the japanese aviation accident precedent

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The development of the aviation technology is beyond the people`s imagination. For example, with some exaggeration, If the autopilot engage upon take off, You will realize that you are on the centerline of the foggy JFK runway 13R after 15 hours with only once or twice of intervention. But the more aviation technology develops, the more responsible the pilot will be who has the final authority of the aviation safety. In the JAL 706 accident caused by unidentified reason, the pilot increased pitch abruptly and overrode the control from the autopilot. The result of this process made the death of a flight attendant and some injuries of a few passengers. The district court found the pilot not guilty at the first trial on the ground that the control override was not connected to the possibility of foresight and avoidance of the human death. The pilot was proved to be innocent through the analysis of the DFDR and ADAS that the override did not precede the unidentified pitch up motion. The judicial precedent related to aviation accidents in Korea requires pilots` absolute and extended care compared to the ordinarily prudent or reasonably careful behaviors in the vehicle and medical accidents Although there is some controversy about the standard care, the care required in the actual operation of high tech aircraft by a pilot should include objective and standard care and be judged by analysis of the scientific data. Although the pilot maintained the unusual hi speed that doesn`t have safety margin and descended under turbulence in case of the JAL 706 accident, the court negatived its relation to the cause of pitch up. Also, the override of the control after initial pitch up might have caused the possibility of the death and injury, but the court denied it. Because of this complex cause of the aviation accidents, it is important for a court to figure out the core reason of the event and casual relationship with the pilot Now, It is required that the judgement of negligence in the aviation accidents should include an objective care with scientific data from simulated circumstances(or a simulator) as the Japanese court not from the theory of vehicle`s negligence.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이재상, "형법총론, 박영사, 2005, 188면, 형법총론, 법문사, 2005, 446면"

2 배종대, "형법총론, 510면, 손해목, 형법총론, 1028면"

3 김일수, "형법총론, 487면, 배종대, 형법총론, 481면, 임웅, 형법총론, 366면, 이경열, 과실범의 공동정범에 관한 일고, 공범론과 형사법의 제 문제, 138면"

4 정영일, "분업적 의료행위에 있어서 형법상 과실책임" 6 : 56-,

5 이재상, "과실범의 공동정범" (14) : 222-,

6 이재상, "과실범의 공동정범" (14) : 229-,

7 서보학, "과실범에 있어서 주의 의무 위반의 체계적 지위와 판단" (15) : 30-,

8 서보학, "과실범에 있어서 주의 의무 위반의 체계적 지위와 판단" (15) : 36-,

9 이용식, "과실범에 있어서 주의 의무 위반의 객관적 척도와 개인적 척도" 39 (39): 40-41,

10 정영일, "과실범에 있어서 인적 불법론에 관현 연구" 서울대 1992

11 김성돈, "과실개념에서 주의의무위반성과 예견가능성" 6 (6): 173-, 1995

12 김성돈, "과실개념에서 주의의무위반성과 예견 가능성" 6 (6): 1996

13 Hirsch, "ZStW 92, S.270"

14 Roxin, "Taeterschaft und Tatherrschaft, 1. Aufl.S. 536"

15 Lampe, "Taeterschaft bei fahrlaessiger Straftat, ZStW 71, S. 607"

16 Kuehl, "Strafrecht 20/10"

17 Otto, "Spendel FS S. 282: Weisser, JZ 98, 232"

18 Stratenwerth, "FS-Jescheck, S. 296"