국제 법률문서의 번역전략―UN 장애인 권리협약 비준 동의안을 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study attempts to examine a plausible translation strategy for legal texts, especially for the “UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” Although literal translation is the most appropriate translational strategy for legal texts, it does not sufficiently cover legal language which has normative, performative and technical functions. This study has two purposes. First, it attempts to discuss problems in legal translation caused by different legal systems and linguistic and cultural differences. As is often the case, legal translators are liable to face many problems in translating legal documents. Therefore, they should choose some strategies for translating legal texts. Second, this paper examines diverse translation theories in order to find adequate one for legal translation. In the history of translation studies, there have been various theories and researches for adequate translation. Among them, the “Skopos Theory” which argues that the target text is determined by the aim of the document within its culture, would be the most plausible in that it takes into account a legal document’s purpose of carrying the target culture. Applying the rules of the Skopos Theory to the “United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,” It is found that legal translators can easily meet the functionality and loyalty requirements of translation and maintain coherence between the source text and the target text with the theory.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• 1. 법률번역의 특수성과 적합한 번역전략
• 2. UN 장애인권리 협약 비준동의안 검토
• Ⅲ. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박준언, "특수목적 영어교육(English for Specific Purposes)" 10 (10): 137-162, 2003

2 가트 가드너, "컴퓨터그래픽과 애니메이션―역사, 직업으로서의 경력, 전문가의 조언" 커뮤니케이션북스 2007

3 소장섭, "장애인권리협약 번역본은 오류 투성이②, 인터넷 장애인 신문 에이블 뉴스, 2008/08/19"

4 소장섭, "장애인권리협약 번역본은 오류 투성이①, 인터넷 장애인 신문 에이블 뉴스, 2008/08/19"

5 정희석, "일본 요육의료시설을 가다!, 『청년의사』. 2006/04/24"

6 A. Anastasi, "심리검사론" 율곡출판사 1994

7 장경학, "법학통론" 법문사 1998

8 제레미 먼데이, "번역학입문-이론과 적용" 한국외대 출판부 2006

9 장남팽, "번역학비판-응용이론에서 순수이론까지" 한국외대 출판부 2006

10 수잔 바스넷, "번역학-이론과 실제" 한신문화사 2004

11 로렌스 베누티, "번역의 윤리―차이의 미학을 위하여" 열린책들 2006

12 볼프람 빌스, "번역교육입문" 고려대학교 출판부 2002

13 곽윤직, "민법 총칙: 민법강의 Ⅰ" 박영사 2002

14 古田裕, "飜譯語としての日本の法律用語: 原語の背景と歐州的人間觀の探究" 中央大學出版部 2004

15 김대순, "國際法論" 삼영사 2006

16 松井芳郞, "國際法" 有斐閣 2007

17 Morris, Marshall, "Translation and the Law" John Benjamins 1995

18 Basnett, Susan, "Translation Studies" Routledge 1991

19 Nord, Christiane, "Translating as a Purposeful Activity: Functionalist Approaches Explained" St. Jerome 1997

20 Cao, Deborah, "Translating Law" Multilingual Matters 2007

21 Madsen, Dorte, "Towards a Description of Communication in the Legal Universe. Translation of Legal Texts and the Skopos Theory" 1 (1): 17-27, 1997

22 Nida, Eugene, "Toward a Science of Translating" E. J. Brill 1964

23 Šarčević, Susan, "New Approaches to Legal Translation" Kluwer Law International 1997

24 Garzone, Giuliana, "Legal Translation and Functionalist Approaches: A Contradiction in Terms?" ASTTI/ ETI 395-414, 2000

25 Alcaraz, Enrique, "Legal Translation Explained" St. Jerome 2002

26 Didier, Emmanuel, "Langues et langages du droit" Wilson & Lafleur 1990

27 Munday, Jeremy, "Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications" Routledge 2001

28 Beaupré, Micahel, "Interpreting Bilingual Legislation" Carswell 1986

29 Baker, Mona, "In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation" Routledge 1992

30 참조판례, "Fonden Marselisborg Lystbådehavn C-428/02 (2005) ECJ"

31 Newmark, Peter, "A Textbook of Translation" Prentice 1988

32 Vermeer, Hans, "A Skopos Theory of Translation: Some Arguments For and Agains" TextContext 1996