RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    공정한 임금, 공정한 사회 = 비교가치(comparable worth)의 규범적 정당성에 관한 소고

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103591673

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The impetus of this paper comes from a question concerning a normative justification of comparable worth. Comparable worth (or pay equity) is a principle that supports equal wage for the work of equal value. Importantly, it provides a rationale for criticizing gender pay gap in the labor market. This paper argues that gender pay gap is an outcome caused by the gender division of job and gender job hierarchy, which are all systematically generated by the unjust structural discrimination of gender. It thus argues that a normative justification of comparable worth should rely on an effort to identify and rectify unjust structural gender inequality rather than to delve into the intrinsic value of labor itself. In this concern, it is reasonable to say that comparable worth has radical potential to challenge structural gender discrimination including not only gender pay gap in the labor market but also various women's and gender issues of society related to the structural injustice of gender.
    번역하기

    The impetus of this paper comes from a question concerning a normative justification of comparable worth. Comparable worth (or pay equity) is a principle that supports equal wage for the work of equal value. Importantly, it provides a rationale for cr...

    The impetus of this paper comes from a question concerning a normative justification of comparable worth. Comparable worth (or pay equity) is a principle that supports equal wage for the work of equal value. Importantly, it provides a rationale for criticizing gender pay gap in the labor market. This paper argues that gender pay gap is an outcome caused by the gender division of job and gender job hierarchy, which are all systematically generated by the unjust structural discrimination of gender. It thus argues that a normative justification of comparable worth should rely on an effort to identify and rectify unjust structural gender inequality rather than to delve into the intrinsic value of labor itself. In this concern, it is reasonable to say that comparable worth has radical potential to challenge structural gender discrimination including not only gender pay gap in the labor market but also various women's and gender issues of society related to the structural injustice of gender.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼