RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    의료 소프트웨어 품질 정량화를 위한 TQM 기법 = A Method of Test Quality Management for Medical Software Quality Digitizing

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103578490

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper presents the model of realizing requirement to ensure the QCD(Quality Cost Delivery) of medical software during the development cycle. In many cases, customer needs are likely to change in the process of carrying out projects. When medical software is released to customers without the needs to be reflected, many more defects can be found when the software is actually used in the medical field. The defects are fatal in the medical domain. To solve these problems, GQM(Goal Question Metric) methodology is used. With this methodology, goals are set, questionnaires are devised, and review of domain expert is sought. In addition, requirements are extracted and defined. And then, test cases are finally completed based on the requirements. The test cases made through these processes are quantitatively prioritized by using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) methodology. Once the priority is determined, the test case is configured in order to determine how the test case has been carried out in accordance with the number of test cases. It is possible to digitize the quality of software before it is delivered to the customers to see whether enough tests are officially performed for the project. Using this TQM, it is expected that the level of software quality is determined while the project is being carried out, instead of evaluating the software at the end of the project.
    번역하기

    This paper presents the model of realizing requirement to ensure the QCD(Quality Cost Delivery) of medical software during the development cycle. In many cases, customer needs are likely to change in the process of carrying out projects. When medical ...

    This paper presents the model of realizing requirement to ensure the QCD(Quality Cost Delivery) of medical software during the development cycle. In many cases, customer needs are likely to change in the process of carrying out projects. When medical software is released to customers without the needs to be reflected, many more defects can be found when the software is actually used in the medical field. The defects are fatal in the medical domain. To solve these problems, GQM(Goal Question Metric) methodology is used. With this methodology, goals are set, questionnaires are devised, and review of domain expert is sought. In addition, requirements are extracted and defined. And then, test cases are finally completed based on the requirements. The test cases made through these processes are quantitatively prioritized by using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) methodology. Once the priority is determined, the test case is configured in order to determine how the test case has been carried out in accordance with the number of test cases. It is possible to digitize the quality of software before it is delivered to the customers to see whether enough tests are officially performed for the project. Using this TQM, it is expected that the level of software quality is determined while the project is being carried out, instead of evaluating the software at the end of the project.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박준, "병원 의료장비 교체 우선순위를 결정하는 지표의 개발" 한국경영과학회 37 (37): 161-180, 2012

    2 B. Boehm, "Value-based Software engineering:Case study" 33-41, 2003

    3 F. E. Young, "Validation of medical software:present policy of the Food and Drug Administration" 106 : 628-629, 1987

    4 A. Abran, "Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO standards" 11 (11): 325-338, 2003

    5 J. R. Evans, "The management and control of quality" South-Western 115-128, 2002

    6 P. C. Jorgensen, "Software testing: A craftsman’s approach" CRC press 4-6, 2016

    7 이철, "SOA 기반 소프트웨어 품질평가 모델 개발" 한국콘텐츠학회 8 (8): 82-93, 2008

    8 S. C. Kim, "Priority aggregation for AHP based on experts opinions" 19 (19): 41-51, 1994

    9 K-W. Song, "Opportunity tree framework design for quality and delivery of S/W product" Springer Berlin Heidelberg 1331-1337, 2005

    10 "Medical Quality Management"

    1 박준, "병원 의료장비 교체 우선순위를 결정하는 지표의 개발" 한국경영과학회 37 (37): 161-180, 2012

    2 B. Boehm, "Value-based Software engineering:Case study" 33-41, 2003

    3 F. E. Young, "Validation of medical software:present policy of the Food and Drug Administration" 106 : 628-629, 1987

    4 A. Abran, "Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO standards" 11 (11): 325-338, 2003

    5 J. R. Evans, "The management and control of quality" South-Western 115-128, 2002

    6 P. C. Jorgensen, "Software testing: A craftsman’s approach" CRC press 4-6, 2016

    7 이철, "SOA 기반 소프트웨어 품질평가 모델 개발" 한국콘텐츠학회 8 (8): 82-93, 2008

    8 S. C. Kim, "Priority aggregation for AHP based on experts opinions" 19 (19): 41-51, 1994

    9 K-W. Song, "Opportunity tree framework design for quality and delivery of S/W product" Springer Berlin Heidelberg 1331-1337, 2005

    10 "Medical Quality Management"

    11 K-W. Song, "Measurement and management of the level of quality control process in Soc(system on chip) embedded software development" 2012

    12 R. L. Lynch, "Measure up!" Blackwell 1995

    13 T. L. Saaty, "Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process"

    14 F. Van Latum, "Adopting GQM-based measurement in an industrial environment" 1998

    15 T. Kasse, "Action focused assessment for software process improvement" Artech House 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-04-09 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Knowledge Information Technology Society KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-03-17 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of The Korea Knowledge Information Technology Society -> Journal of Knowledge Information Technology and Systems KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.39 0.39 0.29
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.25 0.22 0.312 0.07
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼