RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      정서지능  :  성격인가? 능력인가? Personality or Ability? = Emotional Intelligence

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45018631

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Emotional intelligence is conceptualized based on the studies of interactions between cognition and emotion in 1970-1980. One of the reasons that emotional intelligence is attracted by many researchers and public are due to the continuous skepticism on the intelligence tests in their validity, measurement methods, and efficiency. The IQ tests are criticized as measurement which is lack of predictive validity in predicting life success, job success, or life satisfaction except academic success. Definitions and measuring methods of emotional intelligence are still in dispute and far from reaching agreement. So we need to study the existing body of research and identify the problems and difficulties to solve.
      There are two general approaches to emotional intelligence: One is EI should be abilities and the other is EI should be a mixture of abilities and some personality traits.. Personality approach is easy to develop measurement and may cover more broadly the nonacademic intelligence area, but it is overlapped with the existing personality traits and more and more traits should be included. On the other hand, ability model is more theoretically based and attempts to exclude personality variables, but it is also faced the difficulties in measuring emotional intelligence objectively and scientifically.
      번역하기

      Emotional intelligence is conceptualized based on the studies of interactions between cognition and emotion in 1970-1980. One of the reasons that emotional intelligence is attracted by many researchers and public are due to the continuous skepticism o...

      Emotional intelligence is conceptualized based on the studies of interactions between cognition and emotion in 1970-1980. One of the reasons that emotional intelligence is attracted by many researchers and public are due to the continuous skepticism on the intelligence tests in their validity, measurement methods, and efficiency. The IQ tests are criticized as measurement which is lack of predictive validity in predicting life success, job success, or life satisfaction except academic success. Definitions and measuring methods of emotional intelligence are still in dispute and far from reaching agreement. So we need to study the existing body of research and identify the problems and difficulties to solve.
      There are two general approaches to emotional intelligence: One is EI should be abilities and the other is EI should be a mixture of abilities and some personality traits.. Personality approach is easy to develop measurement and may cover more broadly the nonacademic intelligence area, but it is overlapped with the existing personality traits and more and more traits should be included. On the other hand, ability model is more theoretically based and attempts to exclude personality variables, but it is also faced the difficulties in measuring emotional intelligence objectively and scientifically.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 정서 지능의 개념적 정의에 대한 논의
      • Ⅲ. 정서 지능의 생물학적 기초
      • Ⅳ. 정서 지능의 평가
      • Ⅴ. 논의 및 결론
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 정서 지능의 개념적 정의에 대한 논의
      • Ⅲ. 정서 지능의 생물학적 기초
      • Ⅳ. 정서 지능의 평가
      • Ⅴ. 논의 및 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼