RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미국 法源에의 체계적 접근 = A Systematic Approach to the American Legal Sources

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      It is needless to say how pivotal the knowledge of American law is in this globalized society, where American standards are viewed as the global standards. Especially for those who conduct comparative legal studies, or engage in legal research for new legislation, American law supplies abundant and very useful resources. The access to the primary sources of American law has been much easier these days since many libraries of Korean law schools and the Institutions doing legal work have begun to subscribe major on-line legal services such as WESTLAW and LEXISNEXIS.<BR>  Despite of this amazing accessibility, many researchers in Korea often complain about little information they obtain from those on-line services. The author believes that this problem is chiefly derived from the ignorance of the basic framework of the American legal system, including the classification structure and the publication of legal authorities. For this reason, the article provides a general survey of the American legal system especially focusing on the constitutional mechanism, legislative proceedings, and judicial lawmaking.<BR>  There have been many publications in Korea that explain how to find and use American case laws. Nevertheless, it seems quite insufficient to learn enough information about American statutory laws. This article thus tries to summarize the federal and state legislative procedures as well as their respective publications of primary legal materials. In this regard, slip laws, session laws and the compilation of statutory laws are explained in detail. The author concludes the article by suggesting a tip for an efficient research methodology for American law.
    번역하기

      It is needless to say how pivotal the knowledge of American law is in this globalized society, where American standards are viewed as the global standards. Especially for those who conduct comparative legal studies, or engage in legal rese...

      It is needless to say how pivotal the knowledge of American law is in this globalized society, where American standards are viewed as the global standards. Especially for those who conduct comparative legal studies, or engage in legal research for new legislation, American law supplies abundant and very useful resources. The access to the primary sources of American law has been much easier these days since many libraries of Korean law schools and the Institutions doing legal work have begun to subscribe major on-line legal services such as WESTLAW and LEXISNEXIS.<BR>  Despite of this amazing accessibility, many researchers in Korea often complain about little information they obtain from those on-line services. The author believes that this problem is chiefly derived from the ignorance of the basic framework of the American legal system, including the classification structure and the publication of legal authorities. For this reason, the article provides a general survey of the American legal system especially focusing on the constitutional mechanism, legislative proceedings, and judicial lawmaking.<BR>  There have been many publications in Korea that explain how to find and use American case laws. Nevertheless, it seems quite insufficient to learn enough information about American statutory laws. This article thus tries to summarize the federal and state legislative procedures as well as their respective publications of primary legal materials. In this regard, slip laws, session laws and the compilation of statutory laws are explained in detail. The author concludes the article by suggesting a tip for an efficient research methodology for American law.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
      Ⅱ. 미국법의 특성
      Ⅲ. 사법부와 판례법
      Ⅳ. 입법부와 성문법
      Ⅴ. 체계적인 접근방법
      Ⅵ. 맺음말
      Abstract
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
      Ⅱ. 미국법의 특성
      Ⅲ. 사법부와 판례법
      Ⅳ. 입법부와 성문법
      Ⅴ. 체계적인 접근방법
      Ⅵ. 맺음말
      Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정인섭, "해외 법률문헌 조사방법" 서울대학교출판부 2005

    2 Paul S. Berman, "The Globalization of Jurisdiction"

    3 Richard J. Ross, "The Career of Puritan Jurisprudence"

    4 M.D. Murray, "Legal Research Methods"

    5 R. Mersky, "Legal Research Illustrated, 8th ed"

    6 Brun-Otto Bryde, "Fundamental Rights as Guidelines and Inspiration: German Constitutionalism in International Perspective"

    7 이전 다음 자료유형 학술지(정기간행물) 학술대회논문 단행본 보고서 학위논문 인터넷자원 기타자료 Simon Chesterman, "An International Rule of Law"

    8 Bernard Schwartz, "A History of the Supreme Court"

    9 "."

    10 "."

    1 정인섭, "해외 법률문헌 조사방법" 서울대학교출판부 2005

    2 Paul S. Berman, "The Globalization of Jurisdiction"

    3 Richard J. Ross, "The Career of Puritan Jurisprudence"

    4 M.D. Murray, "Legal Research Methods"

    5 R. Mersky, "Legal Research Illustrated, 8th ed"

    6 Brun-Otto Bryde, "Fundamental Rights as Guidelines and Inspiration: German Constitutionalism in International Perspective"

    7 이전 다음 자료유형 학술지(정기간행물) 학술대회논문 단행본 보고서 학위논문 인터넷자원 기타자료 Simon Chesterman, "An International Rule of Law"

    8 Bernard Schwartz, "A History of the Supreme Court"

    9 "."

    10 "."

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2017-10-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 법학연구원 KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-10-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SungKyunKwan Law Review KCI등재
    2008-05-13 학회명변경 한글명 : 비교법연구소 -> 법학연구소
    영문명 : Institute for Comparative Legal Studies -> The Institute of Legal Studies
    KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.64 0.64 0.71
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.6 0.57 0.849 0.28
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼