老朽化된 공동주택의 終末期에 있어서의 구분소유권 終了제도 입법에 관한 비교법적 연구 = Legislation of Condominium Ownership Expiration System in the End of Deteriorated Apartment House: A Study Based on Comparative Law

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Is there no physical and temporal limit in restoration (reconstruction andremodeling) of aggregate building including apartment house? In regard todeteriorated buildings, what would be ‘the ideal goals of future behaviorsin the Condominium Ownership?’ In terms of deteriorated buildings,current Aggregate Building Act permits 1) possible justifications only forreconstruction. Or if interested parties fail to come to any agreement onreconstruction in form of resolution, the owners of partitioned property areentitled to maintain the presence of the building alone. Housing Act, asort of public law, has exceptional provisions about 2) remodeling ofbuildings to prepare legislative means for restoring deteriorated buildings.
The purpose of this study is to take a sense of critical mind asmentioned above and thereby make a legislative exploration intointroduction of Condominium Ownership expiration system in deterioratedaggregate building. In other words, it seeks to suggest such possiblelegislative provisions that the partitioned property owner can opt for anew (fourth) legislative alternative under Aggregate Building Act withregard to the Condominium Ownership expiration which can beprocedurally implemented only by unanimous consent under private law tothe extent of three current legislative options such as reconstruction,remodeling and status quo (maintenance). The essential feature of housinglies in sustenance of housing, but in parallel with the sustenance, it is required to make a legal, institutional and policy-level deliberation inpermitting any right to quit a relationship of Condominium Ownership asa part of another alternative.
In terms of deteriorated buildings, it is concluded that ‘the ideal goals offuture behaviors in the Condominium Ownership’ would be to explorepossible introduction of Condominium Ownership expiration system - inparallel with current legislations of reconstruction resolution premised onlyon sustenance of Condominium Ownership - so partitioned property ownerscan freely choose ‘whether to maintain or expire a relationship ofpartitioned ownership’, which would be a little more advanced legislationthan current one.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강혁신, "집합건물의 소유 및 관리에 관한 법률 개정 - 임차인에 대한 결의권 부여 및 관리단 분리(또는 별도의 관리단 창설)에 관한 개정위원회 논의를 중심으로 -" 한국민사법학회 55 (55): 385-417, 2011

2 강혁신, "집합건물의 공용부분 변경에 관한 몇 가지 문제" 법학연구원 19 (19): 211-232, 2012

3 강혁신, "집합건물법에서의 ‘시가’에 관한 연구" 국제지역학회 10 (10): 963-980, 2006

4 강혁신, "일본의 ‘건물의 구분소유 등에 관한 법률’에 있어서의 區分所有權의 動態" 한국민사법학회 43 (43): 167-201, 2008

5 丸山英気, "都市の法律学" 悠々社 2000

6 鎌野, "老朽化した区分所有建物の建替えに 関する諸外国法制等に関する調査研究報告書" 商事法務 2011

7 戎正晴, "老朽マンションの建替え-団地建替えを中心に-" 日本司 法書士連合会 (415) : 2006

8 玉田弘毅, "注解建物区分所有法(1)" 第一法規出版 1979

9 藤巻梓, "新たなドイツ住居所有権法における建物の管理" 日本 不動産学会 22 (22): 2009

10 法務省明時局参事官室, "新しいマンション法" (社)商事法務研究会 1994

11 丸山英気, "改正区分所有法の性格" (795) : 1983

12 玉田弘毅, "建物区分所有法の現代的課題" 商事法務研究会 1981

13 濱崎恭生, "建物区分所有法の改正" 法曹会 1989

14 水本浩, "基本法コンメンタール, マンション法" 日本評論社 1999

15 강혁신, "區分所有權의 所有權性 變質論" 한국민사법학회 (40) : 125-156, 2008

16 塩崎 勤, "区分所有関係訴訟法、裁判実務体系19" 青林書院 1992

17 塩崎勤, "区分所有関係訴訟法 : 裁判実務体系19" 青林書院 1992

18 丸山英気, "区分所有法" 大成出版社 1984

19 瀬下博之, "区分所有権の経済分析(その経済合理性とマンション建て替え問題の解決方 法)" 日本不動産学会 22 (22): 2009

20 青山正明, "不動産法第5卷 区分所有法" 青山書林 1997

21 折田泰宏, "マンション建替え法解説" 三省堂 2003

22 玉田弘毅, "マンションの法律2" 一粒社 1986

23 寺尾　仁, "フランスにおける区分所有建物管理制度の概要、直面する課題と法改正" 日本不動産学会 22 (22): 2009

24 丸山英気, "ドイツの住居所有権法と区分所有法, In マンションは行き残されるか" (財) アーバンハウジング 1997

25 藤井俊二, "ドイツのおける住居所有権住宅(マンション)の復旧⋅建替え制度" 74 (74): 1999

26 稲本洋之助, "コンメンタールマンション区分所有法" 日本評論社 2004