RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      The Clinical Impact of β-Blocker Therapy on Patients With Chronic Coronary Artery Disease After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108174787

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background and Objectives: The outcome benefits of β-blockers in chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) have not been fully assessed. We evaluated the prognostic impact of β-blockers on patients with chronic CAD after percutaneous coronary interventi...

      Background and Objectives: The outcome benefits of β-blockers in chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) have not been fully assessed. We evaluated the prognostic impact of β-blockers on patients with chronic CAD after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
      Methods: A total of 3,075 patients with chronic CAD were included from the Grand Drug-Eluting Stent registry. We analyzed β-blocker prescriptions, including doses and types, in each patient at 3-month intervals from discharge. After propensity score matching, 1,170 pairs of patients (β-blockers vs. no β-blockers) were derived. Primary outcome was defined as a composite endpoint of all-cause death and myocardial infarction (MI). We further analyzed the outcome benefits of different doses (low-, medium-, and high-dose) and types (conventional or vasodilating) of β-blockers.
      Results: During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 3.1 (3.0–3.1) years, 134 (5.7%) patients experienced primary outcome. Overall, β-blockers demonstrated no significant benefit in primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63–1.24), all-cause death (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.60–1.25), and MI (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.49–3.15). In subgroup analysis, β-blockers were associated with a lower risk of all-cause death in patients with previous MI and/or revascularization (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.14–0.99) (p for interaction=0.045). No significant associations were found for the clinical outcomes with different doses and types of β-blockers.
      Conclusions: Overall, β-blocker therapy was not associated with better clinical outcomes in patients with chronic CAD undergoing PCI. Limited mortality benefit of β-blockers may exist for patients with previous MI and/or revascularization.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Ambrosio G, "β-blockade with nebivolol for prevention of acute ischaemic events in elderly patients with heart failure" 97 : 209-214, 2011

      2 Sorbets E, "β-Blockers, calcium antagonists, and mortality in stable coronary artery disease : an international cohort study" 40 : 1399-1407, 2019

      3 Bangalore S, "β-Blockers and cardiovascular events in patients with and without myocardial infarction : post hoc analysis from the CHARISMA trial" 7 : 872-881, 2014

      4 Bangalore S, "β-Blocker use and clinical outcomes in stable outpatients with and without coronary artery disease" 308 : 1340-1349, 2012

      5 Andersson C, "β-Blocker therapy and cardiac events among patients with newly diagnosed coronary heart disease" 64 : 247-252, 2014

      6 Puymirat E, "β blockers and mortality after myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure : multicentre prospective cohort study" 354 : i4801-, 2016

      7 Viskin S, "Treatment with beta-adrenergic blocking agents after myocardial infarction : from randomized trials to clinical practice" 25 : 1327-1332, 1995

      8 "The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trial" 353 : 9-13, 1999

      9 Parsons LS, "Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using greedy matching techniques" SAS User Groups 2001

      10 Hwang D, "Prognostic impact of β-blocker dose after acute myocardial infarction" 83 : 410-417, 2019

      1 Ambrosio G, "β-blockade with nebivolol for prevention of acute ischaemic events in elderly patients with heart failure" 97 : 209-214, 2011

      2 Sorbets E, "β-Blockers, calcium antagonists, and mortality in stable coronary artery disease : an international cohort study" 40 : 1399-1407, 2019

      3 Bangalore S, "β-Blockers and cardiovascular events in patients with and without myocardial infarction : post hoc analysis from the CHARISMA trial" 7 : 872-881, 2014

      4 Bangalore S, "β-Blocker use and clinical outcomes in stable outpatients with and without coronary artery disease" 308 : 1340-1349, 2012

      5 Andersson C, "β-Blocker therapy and cardiac events among patients with newly diagnosed coronary heart disease" 64 : 247-252, 2014

      6 Puymirat E, "β blockers and mortality after myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure : multicentre prospective cohort study" 354 : i4801-, 2016

      7 Viskin S, "Treatment with beta-adrenergic blocking agents after myocardial infarction : from randomized trials to clinical practice" 25 : 1327-1332, 1995

      8 "The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trial" 353 : 9-13, 1999

      9 Parsons LS, "Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using greedy matching techniques" SAS User Groups 2001

      10 Hwang D, "Prognostic impact of β-blocker dose after acute myocardial infarction" 83 : 410-417, 2019

      11 Motivala AA, "Predictors, trends, and outcomes(among older patients ≥65 years of age)associated with beta-blocker use in patients with stable angina undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention : insights from the NCDR registry" 9 : 1639-1648, 2016

      12 Park J, "Optimal dose and type of β-blockers in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention" 137 : 12-19, 2020

      13 Diaz A, "Long-term prognostic value of resting heart rate in patients with suspected or proven coronary artery disease" 26 : 967-974, 2005

      14 Jaehoon Chung ; Jung-Kyu Han ; Han-Mo Yang ; Kyung-Woo Park ; Hyun-Jae Kang ; Bon-Kwon Koo ; Myung Ho Jeong ; Hyo-Soo Kim, "Long-term efficacy of vasodilating β-blocker in patients with acute myocardial infarction: nationwide multicenter prospective registry" 대한내과학회 36 : 62-71, 2021

      15 Fonseca VA, "Effects of beta-blockers on glucose and lipid metabolism" 26 : 615-629, 2010

      16 Hjalmarson A, "Effect on mortality of metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. A double-blind randomised trial" 2 : 823-827, 1981

      17 Dahl Aarvik M, "Effect of oral β-blocker treatment on mortality in contemporary post-myocardial infarction patients : a systematic review and meta-analysis" 5 : 12-20, 2019

      18 Packer M, "Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure" 344 : 1651-1658, 2001

      19 Dargie HJ, "Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction : the CAPRICORN randomised trial" 357 : 1385-1390, 2001

      20 Goldberger JJ, "Effect of beta-blocker dose on survival after acute myocardial infarction" 66 : 1431-1441, 2015

      21 Narahara KA, "Double-blind comparison of once daily betaxolol versus propranolol four times daily in stable angina pectoris" 65 : 577-582, 1990

      22 Rodrigues EA, "Comparison of bevantolol and atenolol in chronic stable angina" 61 : 1204-1209, 1988

      23 Johnston DL, "Comparative effects of propranolol and verapamil alone and in combination on left ventricular function and volumes in patients with chronic exertional angina : a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study with radionuclide ventriculography" 68 : 1280-1289, 1983

      24 Bangalore S, "Clinical outcomes with β-blockers for myocardial infarction : a meta-analysis of randomized trials" 127 : 939-953, 2014

      25 McEniery CM, "Central blood pressure : current evidence and clinical importance" 35 : 1719-1725, 2014

      26 Leizorovicz A, "Bisoprolol for the treatment of chronic heart failure : a meta-analysis on individual data of two placebo-controlled studies--CIBIS and CIBIS II. Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study" 143 : 301-307, 2002

      27 Chung J, "Benefit of vasodilating β-blockers in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention : nationwide multicenter cohort study" 6 : e007063-, 2017

      28 Austin PC, "Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples" 28 : 3083-3107, 2009

      29 Knuuti J, "2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes" 41 : 407-477, 2020

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-05-15 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한순환기학회 -> 대한심장학회
      영문명 : The Korean Society Of Circulation -> The Korean Society of Cardiology
      KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-08-02 학술지등록 한글명 : Korean Circulation Journal
      외국어명 : Korean Circulation Journal
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.13 0.34 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.45 0.36 0.52 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼