RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      엘리트 선수와 엘리트 청소년 선수의 도핑에 대한 사고방식, 믿음 및 지식의 연관성 및 차이점 = Relation and Difference in Attitudes, Beliefs and Knowledge for Doping between Elite and Elite Adolescent Athletes in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100103635

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In the strategy for the doping control, attitudes and beliefs are considered an index of doping behaviour, relating the use of banned substances to greater leniency towards doping. The aim of this study was to quantitatively measure and to compare the doping related attitudes, beliefs and knowledge between elite and elite adolescent athletes. Data were collected by questionnaires among elite athletes (n=315) and elite adolescent athletes (n=123) who were participating in the 6th East Asian Games and the 2nd Asian Youth Games, respectively. Outcome measures included doping knowledge, behavior and attitude (Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale; PEAS). PEAS scores were 39.87±13.41 in elite athletes and 38.39±11.36 in elite adolescent athletes, in which there was no significant difference between the two groups. Sixty percent of elite athletes and 42.3% of elite adolescent athletes were well aware of banned substances in their events. Sources of information about doping were not different between the two groups. Twelve elite athletes (3.8%) and one elite adolescent athlete (0.8%) admitted the past use of doping knowingly or inadvertently. Athletes who reported that they knew others doping demonstrated higher PEAS score, in which there no significant difference between the two groups. Elite athletes showed significantly higher PEAS score in judo, while elite adolescent athletes showed significantly higher PEAS score in swimming, shooting and table tennis. Elite athletes demonstrated more permissive attitudes toward doping in 4 items among 17 PEAS questionnaires. This study may provide elite and elite adolescent athletes with targeted education strategy for effective anti-doping program. We hopefully encourage national anti-doping agency and sport federations to pay more attention to educational or preventive programmes in terms of athletes" attidudes, beliefs and knowledge.
      번역하기

      In the strategy for the doping control, attitudes and beliefs are considered an index of doping behaviour, relating the use of banned substances to greater leniency towards doping. The aim of this study was to quantitatively measure and to compare the...

      In the strategy for the doping control, attitudes and beliefs are considered an index of doping behaviour, relating the use of banned substances to greater leniency towards doping. The aim of this study was to quantitatively measure and to compare the doping related attitudes, beliefs and knowledge between elite and elite adolescent athletes. Data were collected by questionnaires among elite athletes (n=315) and elite adolescent athletes (n=123) who were participating in the 6th East Asian Games and the 2nd Asian Youth Games, respectively. Outcome measures included doping knowledge, behavior and attitude (Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale; PEAS). PEAS scores were 39.87±13.41 in elite athletes and 38.39±11.36 in elite adolescent athletes, in which there was no significant difference between the two groups. Sixty percent of elite athletes and 42.3% of elite adolescent athletes were well aware of banned substances in their events. Sources of information about doping were not different between the two groups. Twelve elite athletes (3.8%) and one elite adolescent athlete (0.8%) admitted the past use of doping knowingly or inadvertently. Athletes who reported that they knew others doping demonstrated higher PEAS score, in which there no significant difference between the two groups. Elite athletes showed significantly higher PEAS score in judo, while elite adolescent athletes showed significantly higher PEAS score in swimming, shooting and table tennis. Elite athletes demonstrated more permissive attitudes toward doping in 4 items among 17 PEAS questionnaires. This study may provide elite and elite adolescent athletes with targeted education strategy for effective anti-doping program. We hopefully encourage national anti-doping agency and sport federations to pay more attention to educational or preventive programmes in terms of athletes" attidudes, beliefs and knowledge.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 연구방법
      • Ⅲ. 결과
      • Ⅳ. 논의
      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 연구방법
      • Ⅲ. 결과
      • Ⅳ. 논의
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김태규, "엘리트 선수의 도핑 사고성향 분석을 위한 한국형 PEAS의 타당도 검증: Rasch 모형 적용" 한국데이터정보과학회 25 (25): 567-578, 2014

      2 Connor, J. M., "Would you dope? A general population test of the Goldman dilemma" 43 (43): 871-872, 2009

      3 World Anti-Doping Agency, "World anti-doping agency: Education"

      4 World Anti-Doping Agency, "The World anti-doping code"

      5 Alaranta, A., "Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport" 27 (27): 842-846, 2006

      6 Lazuras, L., "Predictors of doping intentions in elite-level athletes : a social cognition approach" 32 (32): 694-710, 2010

      7 Gomez, J. E., "Performance- enhancing substances in adolescent athletes" 98 : 41-46, 2002

      8 Koch, J. J., "Performance- enhancing substances and their use among adolescent athletes" 23 : 310-317, 2002

      9 Nieper, A., "Nutritional supplement practices in UK junior national track and field athletes" 39 (39): 645-649, 2005

      10 Petroczi, A., "Measuring explicit attitude toward doping : review of the psychometric properties of the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale" 10 : 390-396, 2009

      1 김태규, "엘리트 선수의 도핑 사고성향 분석을 위한 한국형 PEAS의 타당도 검증: Rasch 모형 적용" 한국데이터정보과학회 25 (25): 567-578, 2014

      2 Connor, J. M., "Would you dope? A general population test of the Goldman dilemma" 43 (43): 871-872, 2009

      3 World Anti-Doping Agency, "World anti-doping agency: Education"

      4 World Anti-Doping Agency, "The World anti-doping code"

      5 Alaranta, A., "Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport" 27 (27): 842-846, 2006

      6 Lazuras, L., "Predictors of doping intentions in elite-level athletes : a social cognition approach" 32 (32): 694-710, 2010

      7 Gomez, J. E., "Performance- enhancing substances in adolescent athletes" 98 : 41-46, 2002

      8 Koch, J. J., "Performance- enhancing substances and their use among adolescent athletes" 23 : 310-317, 2002

      9 Nieper, A., "Nutritional supplement practices in UK junior national track and field athletes" 39 (39): 645-649, 2005

      10 Petroczi, A., "Measuring explicit attitude toward doping : review of the psychometric properties of the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale" 10 : 390-396, 2009

      11 Dodge, T., "Is abstinence an alternative? Predicting adolescent athletes’ intentions to use performance enhancing substances" 13 (13): 703-711, 2008

      12 Thomas, J. O., "Illicit drug knowledge and information-seeking behaviours among elite athletes" 14 (14): 278-282, 2011

      13 Dunn, M., "Elite athletes’' estimates of the prevalence of illicit drug use : evidence for the false consensus effect" 31 (31): 27-32, 2012

      14 Morente-Sánchez, J., "Doping in sport : a review of elite athletes' attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge" 43 : 395-411, 2013

      15 Striegel, H., "Combating drug use in competitive sports : an analysis from the athletes’ perspective" 42 (42): 354-359, 2002

      16 Bloodworth, A. J., "Clean Olympians? Doping and anti-doping : the views of talented young British athletes" 21 (21): 276-282, 2010

      17 Mottram, D. R., "Banned drugs in sport: does the International Olympic Committee (IOC) list need updating?" 27 (27): 1-10, 1999

      18 Backhouse, S, "Attitudes, behaviours, knowledge and education-drugs in sport: past present and future"

      19 Peretti-Watel, P., "Attitudes toward doping and recreational drug use among French elite student athletes" 21 : 1-17, 2004

      20 Petróczi, A., "Attitudes and doping : a structural equation analysis of the relationship between athletes' attitudes, sport orientation and doping behaviour" 2 : 34-, 2007

      21 Mottram, D., "Athletes’ knowledge and views on OTC medication" 29 (29): 851-855, 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.66 0.66 0.67
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.66 0.66 0.593 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼