‘미적대상’과 세잔의 관계를 통해 본 학습자의 미술학습 의미로서 ‘미적 태도’와 교사역할 = Teacher's Role and ‘Aesthetic Attitude' as Learning of the Fine Arts Based on Relations between ‘Aesthetic Objects' and Paul Cezanne

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The aesthetic object for Paul Cezanne just implied the object to be explored with the purpose and intention of expression, and provided an opportunity to successfully complete his work through processes associated with continuous perceptional judgment. The opportunity was converted to an aesthetic attitude that would be immersed in activities of the sensitive and perceptional judgment.
Although the concept of ‘aesthetic attitude' is generally considered to have the meaning concerning the appreciation of beauty, it is also important to understand that attention has to be paid to disinterested, spatial appreciation of any object that will be perceived. If learners can aesthetically perceive every object they are facing in the process of learning fine arts, therefore, the object must be perceived as an aesthetic object. In addition, it can be assumed that their perception is able to be converted to a spontaneous aesthetic attitude.
The purpose of this study is to examine the meaning of relations between learners and aesthetic objects, based on understanding of relations between Paul Cezanne and aesthetic object, and to explore the teacher's role and ‘aesthetic attitude' as a meaning of studying the fine arts. To achieve the purposes, this study was carried out by examining relations between learners and aesthetic objects, as well as relations between Paul Cezanne and aesthetic object. In addition, relations between aesthetic object and learners were examined not only to understand ‘aesthetic object' as the motive for studying the fine arts, but to know its relations with aesthetic attitude. Also studies were performed on the meaning of learners' aesthetic attitude as the attitude toward studying the fine arts, and the teacher's role concerning the attitude.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박라미, "현상학적 관점에 기초한 유, 아동의 미적지각활동 이해를 위한 질적 사례연구 -드로잉 활동중심으로" 한국조형교육학회 29 (29): 167-203, 2007

2 이근호, "현상학과 교육과정 재개념화 운동" 한국교육과정학회 24 (24): 1-25, 2006

3 박라미, "현대미술 표현형식, 형(形, form)의 의미 중요성을 통해 본 유ㆍ아동 미술표현과 의미적 관계이해 필요- 유아 교육활동 자료집과 초등 미술 교과서를 중심으로" 한국미술교육학회 20 (20): 149-178, 2006

4 공병혜, "칸트 미학체계 내에서 미적 대상의 의미, 미학" 21 : 1-37, 1996

5 Takashina, "최초의 현대 화가들" 아트북 1994

6 김융희, "지각의 현상학과 회화- M. Merleau-ponty의 회화론" 한국미학예술회 33-45, 1992

7 박정애, "의미 만들기의 미술" 시공사 2008

8 유혜령, "아동교육 연구의 현상학적 접근: 역사와 과제" 한국교육인류학회 8 (8): 57-90, 2005

9 김종원, "미학대계 제3권: 무용미학의 논제와 춤의 특이성" 서울대출판부 2007

10 박상규, "미학과 현상학" 한신문화사 1997

11 김진엽, "미학" 책 세상 2008

12 김화자, "미켈 뒤프렌느에 있어서 미적 지각" 한국미학예술학회 8 : 139-159, 1998

13 김융희, "미켈 뒤프렌느에 있어서 미적 지각" 한국미학예술학회 8 : 139-159, 1998

14 백경미, "미술교육에서의 패러다임 변화와 교사교육의 역할" 6 (6): 39-54, 2005

15 신인섭, "메를로-퐁티와 세잔 ― 지각으로서의 회화 ―" 한국철학회 (96) : 29-53, 2008

16 김태오, "듀이의 흥미와 하버마스의 관심의 비교 교육철학" 10 : 79-110, 1992

17 양은주, "듀이의 흥미 개념과 학생중심 교육과정" 한국교육과정학회 21 (21): 9-202, 2003

18 박준원, "뒤프랜느의 미의 문제" 3 : 42-, 1999

19 김채영, "교육현상학의 동향과 전망" 3 : 445-483, 1988

20 Gombrich, "The story of art" 예경 1993

21 Ponty, "Sense et Non-sens" Nagel 1948

22 Day, "Preparing teachers of art" The national art education asscocition 1997

23 Dufrenne, "Phénroméniologie de L'expérience esthéique" 이화여자대학교 출판부 1967

24 Silvia Boorghesi, "Paul Cezanne" 마로니에 북스 2006

25 Kneller, "Mouements of thought in modern education" John Wiley & Sons 1984

26 Henckmann, "Lexikon der Ästhetik" 예경 1991

27 Hanterge, "Lehre der Sainte-Victoire" 아트북스 1980

28 Dewey, "Interest in relation to Training of the Will"

29 Parsons, "How we understand art: A cognitive developmental account of aesthetic experience" Cambridge university press 1987

30 Peters, "Ethics and Education" 교육과학사 1980

31 Pinar,W., "Curricuium theorizing: The Reconceptualists" McCutchan 1976

32 Rader, "Art and human values" 까치 1987

33 Stolnitz, "Aesthetics and philosophy of art criticism" 이론과 실천 1960

34 Parsons, "Aesthetics and education" 현대미학사 1993