RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    학습 상황요인, 학습 참여동기 및 이러닝 효과성의 관계에 관한 연구 = The Study on Relationships of Learning Situation, Learning Participation Motivation, and E-Learning Effectiveness

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82590349

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The changes of global business environment has been influencing HRD(Human Resource Development) practices. One of the most critical trends is the application of e-Learning on the training and education, which has been supported by the development of network and multimedia technology. Technology development has been encouraging adoptation of e-Learnig that has been advanced based on IT systems and network services. In particular, private businesses have been using this benefits from e-Learning, but comparatively public organizations have not employed the e-Learning as much as the former did. These led the lack of empirical study in the public organizaitons. This study used the 2010 status of Gyeong-Gi province study to analyze the e-Learnig effectiveness. The results show that situational factors such as work environment and openness to learning have positive impact on learning participation motivation, and learning participation motivation has positive impact on e-Learning satisfaction and learning transfer. It is addressed that the effectiveness of e-Learning is congruent with the findings from the study on traditional learning methods. There is not any different between private and public organizations in terms of learning effectiveness. This study utilized comparatively large size of sample so that increased the possibility of generalization of research results. However, there are some limitations. First the result might be affected by common method variance by collecting data from single source of respondents. Respondents evaluated overall of e-learning programs so that e-learning strategies and characteristics of each program were not demonstrated.
    번역하기

    The changes of global business environment has been influencing HRD(Human Resource Development) practices. One of the most critical trends is the application of e-Learning on the training and education, which has been supported by the development of n...

    The changes of global business environment has been influencing HRD(Human Resource Development) practices. One of the most critical trends is the application of e-Learning on the training and education, which has been supported by the development of network and multimedia technology. Technology development has been encouraging adoptation of e-Learnig that has been advanced based on IT systems and network services. In particular, private businesses have been using this benefits from e-Learning, but comparatively public organizations have not employed the e-Learning as much as the former did. These led the lack of empirical study in the public organizaitons. This study used the 2010 status of Gyeong-Gi province study to analyze the e-Learnig effectiveness. The results show that situational factors such as work environment and openness to learning have positive impact on learning participation motivation, and learning participation motivation has positive impact on e-Learning satisfaction and learning transfer. It is addressed that the effectiveness of e-Learning is congruent with the findings from the study on traditional learning methods. There is not any different between private and public organizations in terms of learning effectiveness. This study utilized comparatively large size of sample so that increased the possibility of generalization of research results. However, there are some limitations. First the result might be affected by common method variance by collecting data from single source of respondents. Respondents evaluated overall of e-learning programs so that e-learning strategies and characteristics of each program were not demonstrated.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 유지연, "지식기반사회에서의 e-Learning 현황 및 전망" 13 (13): 28-50, 2001

    2 강경종, "자기주도적 학습을 위한 e-Learning 교수·학습 콘텐츠 개발 모형: 실업계 고등학교 전문교과를 중심으로" 한국농·산업교육학회 37 (37): 103-134, 2005

    3 배을규, "인적자원개발론" 학이시습 2010

    4 배영주, "성인의 자기주도학습 과정에 대한 사례 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2003

    5 김정겸, "사이버교육관련 요수 분석" 30 (30): 65-88, 2003

    6 박양규, "사이버 교육과 재래 교육의 효율성 비교 - 가시적 비용을 중심으로" 24 (24): 399-418, 2000

    7 임효창, "비서직 사원을 대상으로 한 웹기반 교육훈련의 효과성 모형 도출에 관한연구" 10 (10): 21-36, 2001

    8 한안나, "기업교육에서 학습의 직무전이에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 1999

    9 이수경, "기업 e-Learning 학습전이 사례 연구" 한국직업능력개발원 2009

    10 공민영, "기업 e-Learning 프로그램 참여자의 학습전이와 자기주도성, 전이풍토, 학습과의 관계" 한국농·산업교육학회 40 (40): 223-246, 2008

    1 유지연, "지식기반사회에서의 e-Learning 현황 및 전망" 13 (13): 28-50, 2001

    2 강경종, "자기주도적 학습을 위한 e-Learning 교수·학습 콘텐츠 개발 모형: 실업계 고등학교 전문교과를 중심으로" 한국농·산업교육학회 37 (37): 103-134, 2005

    3 배을규, "인적자원개발론" 학이시습 2010

    4 배영주, "성인의 자기주도학습 과정에 대한 사례 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2003

    5 김정겸, "사이버교육관련 요수 분석" 30 (30): 65-88, 2003

    6 박양규, "사이버 교육과 재래 교육의 효율성 비교 - 가시적 비용을 중심으로" 24 (24): 399-418, 2000

    7 임효창, "비서직 사원을 대상으로 한 웹기반 교육훈련의 효과성 모형 도출에 관한연구" 10 (10): 21-36, 2001

    8 한안나, "기업교육에서 학습의 직무전이에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 1999

    9 이수경, "기업 e-Learning 학습전이 사례 연구" 한국직업능력개발원 2009

    10 공민영, "기업 e-Learning 프로그램 참여자의 학습전이와 자기주도성, 전이풍토, 학습과의 관계" 한국농·산업교육학회 40 (40): 223-246, 2008

    11 김계수, "구조방정식모형 분석" 한나래 2007

    12 이성, "경기도 공무원 평생교육체제 강화를 위한 연구" 한국직업능력개발원 2008

    13 이규녀, "e-learning에서 학습참여도, 만족도에 영향을 미치는 자기조절학습 요소 연구" 한국기술교육학회 7 (7): 211-224, 2007

    14 하영자, "e-Learning 성인학습자의 학업성취도에 대한 성취동기 요인 규명" 한국교육정보미디어학회 12 (12): 275-296, 2006

    15 Baldwin, T.T., "Transfer of training: A review and directions for futureresearch" 41 : 63-105, 1988

    16 Tannenbaum, S.I., "Training and development in work organizations" 43 (43): 341-348, 1992

    17 Noe, R.A., "Trainees' attributes and attitudes: neglected influences on trainingeffectiveness" 11 (11): 736-749, 1986

    18 Holton, Ⅲ. E.F., "Toward constructvalidation of a transfer climate instrument" 8 (8): 95-113, 1997

    19 Rouiller, J.Z., "The relationship between organizational transferclimate and positive transfer of training" 4 (4): 377-390, 1993

    20 Noe, R.A., "The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness" 39 : 497-523, 1986

    21 Holton, Ⅲ. E.F., "The flawed four level evaluation model" 7 (7): 5-21, 1996

    22 Larry, R., "Supporting adult learners in web-based training, in Web-based training" EducationalTechnology Publication 445-450, 2001

    23 Brown, T.E., "Single sample cross-validation indices for covariancestructures" 24 (24): 445-455, 1989

    24 Knowles, M.S., "Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers" FolletPublishing Company 1975

    25 Nisar, T.M., "Organizational determinants of e-Learning" 34 (34): 256-262, 2002

    26 Hair, J.F., "Multivariate data analysis" Prentice Hall 2006

    27 Choi, W., "Influences of formal learning, personal learning orientationand supportive learning environment on informal learning" 2011

    28 Mathieu, J.E., "Individual and situational influences on training motivation, in Improving Training Effectiveness in Work Organizations" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 193-221, 1997

    29 Tracey, J.B., "Generalization of employeeinvolvement training to the job setting: Individual and situational effect" 48 : 607-632, 1995

    30 Mulaik, A.A., "Evaluation ofgoodness-of-fit indices for structural equation modeling" 105 (105): 430-455, 1989

    31 Rosenberg, M., "E-Leaning: Strategies for developing knowledge in the digital age" McGraw Hill 2001

    32 Guglielmino, L.M., "Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale" University of Georgia 1977

    33 권성연, "2x2 성취목표지향성과 자기조절학습의 관계" 한국교육공학회 24 (24): 213-240, 2008

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-12-15 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인력개발연구 -> HRD연구
    외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development -> The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly
    KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.1 2.1 2.24
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.18 2.1 3.561 0.63
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼