RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    북한의 에너지난 극복을 위한 남북 협력 가능성 모색 -신재생에너지를 중심으로- = Evaluation of the Possibility of Cooperation in South and North Korean Energy Sector -New & Renewable Energy-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82392830

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines the appropriate mechanisms to assist North Korea for its revitalization of electricity sector and to cooperate in power industries between two Koreas. Oil and gas power plants are not appropriate to North Korea because of high fuel costs and requirement of pipeline construction for supplying natural gas to the power plants. On the whole, a new and large power plant would not be a feasible option for increasing electricity supply under the current obsolete power grid system in North Korea. In North Korea, forests are severely damaged, energy facility is aged, energy efficiency is low, and portion of fossil energy is high, where CDM investment potential is very high. The Feasibility on the application of CDM to the electricity cooperation projects between two Koreas is studies. Furthermore energy supporting project is also being promoted by North Korea in terms of policy, and therefore it is expected to satisfy spontaneous requirement too. In the field of North Korea`s new and renewable energy, CDM project potential was analyzed from wind power, solar energy and bioenergy. In the case of new and renewable energy power generation project including wind power, however, it is deemed difficult to promote due to its less economic feasibility in spite of large amount of cost accompanied. In addition, it requires current into alternate current when the electricity is supplied from new and renewable energy. Even apart from economic feasibility, power supply from new and renewable energy power generation constructed in North Korea is probably not produced in efficient manner because of degraded electric power T&D network of North Korea. Accordingly, it is deemed recommendable for new and renewable energy power generation to be carried out as the pilot project in small scale restricted to a specific area in North Korea regardless of its electric power T&D network. In view of a variety of results derived from this study, in order to promote CDM project in North Korea, the most important thing of all for North Korea is to announce highly reliable policy including CDM investment to the external world. In conclusion, it would be necessary South Korea to approach it from the aspect that mid-and long-term development support for North Korea instead of short-term profit would result in win-win relations between South-North.
    번역하기

    This study examines the appropriate mechanisms to assist North Korea for its revitalization of electricity sector and to cooperate in power industries between two Koreas. Oil and gas power plants are not appropriate to North Korea because of high fuel...

    This study examines the appropriate mechanisms to assist North Korea for its revitalization of electricity sector and to cooperate in power industries between two Koreas. Oil and gas power plants are not appropriate to North Korea because of high fuel costs and requirement of pipeline construction for supplying natural gas to the power plants. On the whole, a new and large power plant would not be a feasible option for increasing electricity supply under the current obsolete power grid system in North Korea. In North Korea, forests are severely damaged, energy facility is aged, energy efficiency is low, and portion of fossil energy is high, where CDM investment potential is very high. The Feasibility on the application of CDM to the electricity cooperation projects between two Koreas is studies. Furthermore energy supporting project is also being promoted by North Korea in terms of policy, and therefore it is expected to satisfy spontaneous requirement too. In the field of North Korea`s new and renewable energy, CDM project potential was analyzed from wind power, solar energy and bioenergy. In the case of new and renewable energy power generation project including wind power, however, it is deemed difficult to promote due to its less economic feasibility in spite of large amount of cost accompanied. In addition, it requires current into alternate current when the electricity is supplied from new and renewable energy. Even apart from economic feasibility, power supply from new and renewable energy power generation constructed in North Korea is probably not produced in efficient manner because of degraded electric power T&D network of North Korea. Accordingly, it is deemed recommendable for new and renewable energy power generation to be carried out as the pilot project in small scale restricted to a specific area in North Korea regardless of its electric power T&D network. In view of a variety of results derived from this study, in order to promote CDM project in North Korea, the most important thing of all for North Korea is to announce highly reliable policy including CDM investment to the external world. In conclusion, it would be necessary South Korea to approach it from the aspect that mid-and long-term development support for North Korea instead of short-term profit would result in win-win relations between South-North.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "「통일신문」(2003.12.15)"

    2 "「조선신보」(2009.8.22)"

    3 "「전기신문」(2010.4.7)"

    4 "「연합뉴스」(2009.7.6)"

    5 "「연합뉴스」(2008.2.1)"

    6 "「연합뉴스」(2007.9.6)"

    7 "「연합뉴스」(2007.2.5)"

    8 "「민주조선」(2010.3.7)"

    9 "「매일경제」(2010.1.8)"

    10 "「매일경제」(2006.10.22)"

    1 "「통일신문」(2003.12.15)"

    2 "「조선신보」(2009.8.22)"

    3 "「전기신문」(2010.4.7)"

    4 "「연합뉴스」(2009.7.6)"

    5 "「연합뉴스」(2008.2.1)"

    6 "「연합뉴스」(2007.9.6)"

    7 "「연합뉴스」(2007.2.5)"

    8 "「민주조선」(2010.3.7)"

    9 "「매일경제」(2010.1.8)"

    10 "「매일경제」(2006.10.22)"

    11 한국세계지역학회, "협력과 갈등의 동북아 에너지 안보: 현황과 쟁점" 인간사랑 2008

    12 특별 취재팀, "한반도 ‘에너지 자립’의 길, “지속가능한 남북 신재생에너지 협력에 있다" 2010

    13 윤순진, "원자력, 정말 희망에너지인가" 경향신문 2010

    14 제러미 리프킨, "수소 혁명" 민음사 2003

    15 통일부 통일교육원, "북한이해 2010" 2010

    16 통계청, "북한의 주요 통계지표" 2009

    17 홍성국, "북한의 에너지 사정, 어제와 오늘" 통일부 통일교육원 2006

    18 양문수, "북한경제의 구조" 서울대학교 출판부 2002

    19 김경술, "북한 에너지문제 해결을 위한 장단기 전략 연구" 에너지경제연구원 2003

    20 정우진, "북한 CDM 사업잠재력 분석 및 남북 협력방안" 에너지경제연구원 2009

    21 특별 취재팀, "북의 신재생에너지 개발 어디까지 왔나, 풍력‧태양열‧조력‧바이오매스 등 기초연구 탄탄" 2010

    22 이강준, "북에 식량만 아니라 재생가능에너지 지원을!" 2008

    23 이한희, "바이오가스와 남북한 신에너지 협력-국제기구와의협력을 중심으로" 삼성경제연구소 2007

    24 이재승, "동북아 에너지 협력 논의의 쟁점과 분석틀: 국제정치경제학적 의제 설정을 중심으로" 사회과학연구원 한국정치연구소 16 (16): 137-164, 2007

    25 정우진, "대북 전력지원 및 협력방안 연구" 에너지경제연구원 2006

    26 녹색성장위원회, "녹색성장 5개년계획(2009-2013)" 2009

    27 허은녕, "남북한의 에너지 자원과 에너지 정책 비교. in: 남북한 환경정책 비교 연구1" 서울대학교 출판부 2008

    28 윤여창, "남북한 환경정책 비교연구1" 서울대학교 출판부 2008

    29 에너지경제연구원, "남북한 에너지체계 비교분석 및 협력방안 연구" 에너지 경제연구원 1993

    30 방기열, "남북한 에너지‧자원사업의 효율적 교역방안 연구" 에너지경제연구원 2003

    31 이강준, "김정일이 ‘햇빛 에너지’ 전도사라고요?" 프레시안 2007

    32 서상목, "김정일 이후의 한반도" 북코리아 2004

    33 오일환, "김정일 시대의 북한 정치 경제" 을유문화사 1999

    34 앤서니 기든스, "기후변화의 정치학" 에코리브로 2009

    35 한국과학기술정보연구원, "NK테크 뉴스레터 167호"

    36 마이클 T. 클레어, "21세기 국제자원 쟁탈전" 한국해양전략연구소 2008

    37 통일연구원, "2009 북한개요" 2009

    38 에너지관리공단 신‧재생에너지센터, "2008년 신‧재생에너지 보급통계" 2009

    39 통일연구원, "2008년 북한경제 종합평가 및 2009년 전망" 2009

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.32 1.32 1.3
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.12 1.1 1.848 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼