RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The effect of negotiation of meaning on the storytelling of adult students in ESL classrooms

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=G3621236

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of negotiation of meaning (NOM) on the quality of stories told by learners in ESL classrooms. Negotiated meaning has taken an important role in second language theories in that it is seen as providing learners with chances for making input comprehensible and for producing comprehensible output. Stories are sense-making activities and products of cultural experiences. Therefore, there are great possibilities for negotiation of meaning when learners tell stories in ESL classrooms with students of different cultural background.
      To investigate the effect of NOM on broader discourse categories produced during storytelling by adult learners in ESL classrooms, 42 students of different language proficiency levels were assigned randomly to two groups. One group told a story for 2-3 minutes to classmates and the teacher, followed by a 3-4 minute period during which the storyteller negotiated the meaning of certain points in the story with the audience. After the NOM session, students retold the story to a different audience in a different classroom. The control group did not have their NOM sessions between the two tellings. Data were analyzed in both quantitative and qualitative ways. New criteria were developed to evaluate the quality of stories based on structural elements of stories. Text analysis was used to elucidate interesting cases in a more detailed way.
      Results of quantitative analyses indicated that there were no clear group effects and no interaction effects, even though there were time (second story > first) and level effects. Therefore, it cannot be simply argued that NOM played an important role in improving the second telling. Based on the results of the qualitative analysis, however, the nature of the improvement between the two groups seemed to be different. Also, a detailed investigation of NOM sessions revealed that there seemed to be good NOM sessions and less effective NOM sessions. Factors that led to good NOM sessions were several: amount of information exchanged during the NOM sessions; to-the-point questions posed by their audience; and tellers’ ability to take in the information.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of negotiation of meaning (NOM) on the quality of stories told by learners in ESL classrooms. Negotiated meaning has taken an important role in second language theories in that it is seen as pro...

      The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of negotiation of meaning (NOM) on the quality of stories told by learners in ESL classrooms. Negotiated meaning has taken an important role in second language theories in that it is seen as providing learners with chances for making input comprehensible and for producing comprehensible output. Stories are sense-making activities and products of cultural experiences. Therefore, there are great possibilities for negotiation of meaning when learners tell stories in ESL classrooms with students of different cultural background.
      To investigate the effect of NOM on broader discourse categories produced during storytelling by adult learners in ESL classrooms, 42 students of different language proficiency levels were assigned randomly to two groups. One group told a story for 2-3 minutes to classmates and the teacher, followed by a 3-4 minute period during which the storyteller negotiated the meaning of certain points in the story with the audience. After the NOM session, students retold the story to a different audience in a different classroom. The control group did not have their NOM sessions between the two tellings. Data were analyzed in both quantitative and qualitative ways. New criteria were developed to evaluate the quality of stories based on structural elements of stories. Text analysis was used to elucidate interesting cases in a more detailed way.
      Results of quantitative analyses indicated that there were no clear group effects and no interaction effects, even though there were time (second story > first) and level effects. Therefore, it cannot be simply argued that NOM played an important role in improving the second telling. Based on the results of the qualitative analysis, however, the nature of the improvement between the two groups seemed to be different. Also, a detailed investigation of NOM sessions revealed that there seemed to be good NOM sessions and less effective NOM sessions. Factors that led to good NOM sessions were several: amount of information exchanged during the NOM sessions; to-the-point questions posed by their audience; and tellers’ ability to take in the information.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Chapter 1:Introduction
      Research Questions
      Chapter 2:Literature Review
      Research on Negotiation of Meaning
      Storytelling
      Chapter Summary
      Chapter 3:Method
      Participants
      Procedure
      Plans for data analysis
      Chapter 4:Results of Quantitative Data Analyses
      Descriptive Statistics
      Hypothesis Testing
      Chapter Summary
      Chapter 5:Results of Qualitative Data Analyses
      Five Cases From the NOM-Group that showed Improvement
      A Case from the non-NOM Group that showed great Improvement
      Improvement in the NOM Group Versus Improvement in the non-NOM Group
      Cases That did not Benefit from their NOM Sessions
      Less Effective NOM Sessions
      Chapter Summary
      Chapter 6:Conclusion
      <References>
      번역하기

      Chapter 1:Introduction Research Questions Chapter 2:Literature Review Research on Negotiation of Meaning Storytelling Chapter Summary Chapter 3:Method Participants Procedure Plans for data analysis Cha...

      Chapter 1:Introduction
      Research Questions
      Chapter 2:Literature Review
      Research on Negotiation of Meaning
      Storytelling
      Chapter Summary
      Chapter 3:Method
      Participants
      Procedure
      Plans for data analysis
      Chapter 4:Results of Quantitative Data Analyses
      Descriptive Statistics
      Hypothesis Testing
      Chapter Summary
      Chapter 5:Results of Qualitative Data Analyses
      Five Cases From the NOM-Group that showed Improvement
      A Case from the non-NOM Group that showed great Improvement
      Improvement in the NOM Group Versus Improvement in the non-NOM Group
      Cases That did not Benefit from their NOM Sessions
      Less Effective NOM Sessions
      Chapter Summary
      Chapter 6:Conclusion
      <References>

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼