인도 고대종교의 회통으로서의 석가모니의 인식과 실천 = The Śākyamuni’s Recognition and Practice as a Principle of Reconciliation in Ancient Indian Religions

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The present study aims to explore the Śākyamuni's Recognition and Practice as a Principle of Reconciliation in Ancient Indian Religions.
Indian religion means the various religions born in India. Religion in India is a way of life according to a conception of reality.
Ancient Indian Religions is classified as orthodox or unorthodox according as it accepts or rejects the authority of the Vedas, the oldest and most sacred scriptures of the Hindus. Brahmanism is generally regarded as orthodox system. The unorthodox systems are Cārvākism(materialism), Jainism, and Buddhism. In the sixth century B.C. Jainism and Buddhism, rose in prostest against the Brahmanism.
Upaniṣads which form part of the Vedas are the real foundations of Brahmanism. They are "the finest flower of Vedic thought". All orthodox schools of Brahmanism look upon Upaniṣads as their supreme authority. The Upaniṣads try to answer the questions like "Where and how does God exist? How are man and the Universe related to Him?" The Upaniṣads explain various theories of the creation of the Universe.
According to the Upaniṣads God and the soul are fundamentally indentical. One of the mahāvakyas, the great utterances of the Upaniṣads are 'Tattvāmasi', 'You are that' and 'Aham Brahmāsmi','I am the absolute'. In other words there is the same divine spirit in every human being. Brahman, the Universal Spirit, is identified with Ātman-self. The Ātman is imprisoned in a particular body, mind and understanding, which create in the individual ignorance of his own infinitude and of his oneness with all beings. Mokṣa is the liberation from this prison house of individuality. Mokṣa can be attained by Jñāna or the transcendent knowledge. Other important doctrines of the Upaniṣads are transmigration of souls and karma. There is no death of the soul. After the death of the body, the soul migrates to another body resulting in a cycle of births. The Karma or action determines the nature of life of man in the next birth.
It is an age-old belief in almost all cultures that there exists in man an eternal and permanent entity variously known as the 'Soul'.
the 'Self' or the 'Spirit' - in short, there exists in many substance called the 'Soul'.
Brahmanism and Jainism teach that the soul of man is an immortal substance. These philosopgers hold that the soul is the essence of man. Thus, although man's body changes and perishes, his soul is changeless and immortal, abiding and immutable. It is the soul which animates the body. The soul is to be equated neither with any part of the body nor with the body as a whole. The soul is known in Jainism as the Jīva and in Brahamanism as the Ātman.
But the Śākyamuni teaches according to the Doctrine of Dependent Origination, everything exists dependently and conditionally; and we have seen that the fact of universal change and impermanence logically follows from the Doctrine of Dependent Origination. As such, there can be nothing which is permanent and unchanging. It is worth noting that th doctrine of universal change and impermance follows from the fundamental teaching, namely, the Doctrine of Dependent Origination, according to which nothing exists unconditionally and absolutely - this arising, that arises and this ceasing to be, that cease to be.
If anything exists absolutely and unconditionally, then it is incapable of entering into interaction with anything else, for to enter into interaction is to undergo change. Thus the view that anything exists permanently contradicts the Doctrine of Dependent Origination.
The conclusion, then, is that the thesis of universal change and impermance logically follows from the Doctrine of Dependent Origination(pratītyasamutpāda), the foundation of the Buddha's Recognition.
It should be emphasized that the Śākyamuni recommends the Doctrine of Dependent Origination as the Middle Way which avoids the two dogmatic extremes of eternalism(śāsvatavāda) and and annihilationism(ucche...

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 논고는 인도 고대종교의 회통으로서의 석가모니의 인식과 실천을 탐색해 보려는데 그 목적이 있다. 본 연구는 인도 고대종교의 인식과 실천을 석가모니가 어떻게 회통했는가를 사상사 중심으로 고찰하였다.
석가모니의 인식은 정통바라문(B.C.1500-500)의 세계관인 유일한 브라흐만(梵)에서 流出 轉變한다는 ‘轉變說(Pariṇāma-vāda)'과 비바라문계의 육사외도의 세계관인 ‘積聚說(Ārambha-vāda)'을 회통한 것이 연기설이다. 석가모니는 연기설을 인식함으로써 인도 고대종교의 斷見과 常見을 회통 할 수있었다. 석가모니의 실천은 당시 시대 사조의 두 주류인 ‘짜르와까’의 快樂說과‘쟈이나교’의 苦行說을 中道로 회통하여 八正道를 수행했다. 이러한 팔정도에의해서 어느 고정적인 입장에 의거하지 않는 것이 중도의 실천이다.
석가모니의 인식과 실천은 연기설에 근거한 중도의 삶이다. 緣起의 眞理는 自性을 인정하지 않으므로 空이요, 空은 있다 없다 하는 有無의 二邊을떠난 것이므로 中道다. 中論에서 말하기를, “緣起인 것을 모두 空性이라고설한다. 그것은 因에 의한 假說이고, 實로 그것은 中道”라고 하고 있다. 우리도 석가모니처럼 일상생활에서 緣起의 인식으로 中道的 삶을 실천하는 것이當爲이다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 타무라쇼루, "천태법화의 사상" 민족사 1989

2 "잡아함경(大正新修大藏經 2)"

3 길희성, "인도철학사" 민음사 1984

4 정태혁, "인도철학" 학연사 1984

5 平川彰, "인도불교의 역사 上ㆍ下" 민족사 1989

6 김선근, "인도 정통철학과 대승불교" 동국대학교출판부 2005

7 金善根, "우리는 왜 법화경을 사경(寫經)하여야 하는가?" 한국불교학회 (47) : 285-316, 2007

8 Paul Williams, "서양학자가 본 불교" 시공사 1989

9 권기종, "불교사상사 연구 上ㆍ下" 한국불교연구원 2004

10 김동화, "불교교리발달사" 삼영출판사 1977

11 김선근, "베단따 철학" 불광출판부 1990

12 金岡秀友, "대승불교총설" 불교시대사 1992

13 "금강반야바라밀경오가해설의(韓國佛敎全書 7)"

14 김선근, "금강경의 인식과 실천" 인도철학회 (18) : 5-19, 2005

15 김선근, "금강경의 교학적 위상과 曹溪宗, 종단 소의경전 편찬의 당위성과 금강경의 교학적 위상" 대한불교조계종 불학연구소 5-56, 2007

16 각묵 스님, "금강경 역해" 불광출판부 2001

17 무비 스님, "금강경 강의" 불광출판부 2001

18 "阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論(大正新修大藏經 27)"

19 무비 스님, "金剛經五家解" 불광출판부 2005

20 李箕永, "金剛經" 한국불교연구원 1987

21 "金剛三昧經論(韓國佛敎全書 1) 上ㆍ中"

22 梶山雄一, "空의 世界, In 현대불교신서22" 1979

23 "淨行品 第七(大正新修大藏經 9)"

24 U. Wogihara, "梵文法華經, Saddharmapunadar ika-Sūtram; Romanized and Revised Text of The Bibliotheca Buddhi ca Publication" The Sankibo Buddhist Book Store 1958

25 현해, "梵文ㆍ漢譯ㆍ英譯ㆍ國譯 四本對照 妙法蓮華經 Ⅰ-Ⅲ" 민족사 2004

26 "攝大乘論釋論(大正新修大藏經 31)"

27 "妙法蓮華經(大正新修大藏經 9)"

28 "大般若波羅蜜多經(大正新修大藏經 7)"

29 "大般若波羅蜜多經(大正新修大藏經 5)"

30 "大智度論(大正新修大藏經 25)"

31 "大方廣佛華嚴經(大正新修大藏經 10)"

32 "大乘起信論內義略探記(大正新修大藏經 44)"

33 "大乘莊嚴經論(大正新修大藏經 31)"

34 前田專學, "印度思想의 歷史" 민족사 1988

35 "中阿含經(大正新修大藏經 1)"

36 "中論(大正新修大藏經 30)"

37 "[小品]般若波羅蜜經(大正新修大藏經 8)"

38 "Vinaya-Piṭka Vol. 1"

39 Conze, Edward, "Vajracchedikā-prajñāpāramitā-sūtra" George Allen Unwin Ltd 1958

40 Radhakrishnan, S, "The Principal Upaniṣads" George Allen & Unwin Ltd 1953

41 E.J.Thomas, "The History of Buddhist Thought" Routledge & Kegan Paul LTD 1951

42 Radhakrishnan, S, "The Dhammapada" Oxford University Press 1966

43 Radhakrishnan, S, "The Brahma Sūtra" George Allen & Unwin Ltd 1960

44 Dayal, Har, "The Bodhisattva Doctrine in Buddhist Samskrit Literature" Motilal Banarsidas 1970

45 Radhakrishnan, S, "The Bhagavadgītā" Unwin Brothers Ltd 1948

46 Radhakrishnan, S, "The Bhagavadgīta" George Allen & Unwin Ltd 1948

47 Karl Jaspers, "Socrates Buddha Confucius Jesus" A Harvest Book 1962

48 "Saṃyutta-Nikāya Vol. Ⅱ"

49 Kenneth K. Inada, "NĀGĀRJUNA" State University of New York at Buffalo 1970

50 Dykstra Y.K, "Miraculous Tales of the Lotus Sūtra from Ancient Japan" Kansai University of Foreign Studies 1983

51 Paul Williams, "Mahāyāna Buddhism" Routledge 1989

52 Suzuki B.L, "Mahayana Buddhism: A Brief Outline" The Macmillan Company 1969

53 김선근, "Karma-yoga 패러다임으로 본 '華嚴經'의 普賢行願" 8 : 62-121, 1998

54 김선근, "Jñāna-yoga 패러다임으로 본 '金剛經'의 阿耨多羅三藐三菩提" 9 : 9-51, 1999

55 Radhakrishnan, S, "Indian Philosophy Vol. 1" George Allen Unwin Ltd 1922

56 Nakamura, Hajime, "Indian Buddhism" Kansai University of Foreign Studies 1980

57 Puligandla, R, "Fundamentals of Indian Philosophy" Abingdon Press 1975

58 Conze, Edward, "Buddhist Wisdom Books" George Allen & Unwin Ltd 1970

59 Conze Edward, "Buddhism: Its Essence and Development" Bruno Cassirer Ltd 1951

60 김선근, "Bhakti-yoga 패러다임으로 본 '法華經'의 觀音信仰" 6 : 47-64, 1996

61 鳩摩羅什, "(韓國佛敎全書 8), 金剛般若波羅蜜經"