RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Supply Contract Intelligence = The Impact of Stockout and Overstock Experiences Using System Dynamics Simulation Model

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99675288

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of behavioral factors (buyer’s tendency to reflect stockout and overstock experiences in ordering decision) on the supply chain performance. This study employs system dynamics to examine the influence of these behavioral factors derived from the interview with several representatives of retailers in South Korea. The results show that different contract can bring different performance (total profit, seller’s profit, buyer’s profit, order quantity, sales quantity, overstock, and stockout). The results also suggest that these behavioral factors play a significantly influential role in the performance of supply contract. These results imply that supply contract should be established based on the analysis of behavioral factors of supply chain participants.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of behavioral factors (buyer’s tendency to reflect stockout and overstock experiences in ordering decision) on the supply chain performance. This study employs system dynamics to examine the ...

    The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of behavioral factors (buyer’s tendency to reflect stockout and overstock experiences in ordering decision) on the supply chain performance. This study employs system dynamics to examine the influence of these behavioral factors derived from the interview with several representatives of retailers in South Korea. The results show that different contract can bring different performance (total profit, seller’s profit, buyer’s profit, order quantity, sales quantity, overstock, and stockout). The results also suggest that these behavioral factors play a significantly influential role in the performance of supply contract. These results imply that supply contract should be established based on the analysis of behavioral factors of supply chain participants.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 서원준, "멀티에이전트시스템(MAS)을 이용한 G2B 조달 프로세스 혁신의 효과평가에 관한 연구 : 나라장터 G2B사례" 한국지능정보시스템학회 18 (18): 157-175, 2012

    2 Mortimer, J. H., "The effects of revenue-sharing contracts on welfare in vertically separated markets : Evidence from the video rental industry" 75 (75): 165-199, 2008

    3 김형진, "The Viral Effect of Online Social Network on New Products Promotion: Investigating Information Diffusion on Twitter" 한국지능정보시스템학회 18 (18): 107-130, 2012

    4 Kandel, E., "The Right to Return" 39 (39): 329-356, 1996

    5 Tsay, A. A., "The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives" 45 (45): 1339-1358, 1999

    6 Gonçalves, P., "The Impact of Endogenous Demand on Push-Pull Production Systems" 21 (21): 187-216, 2005

    7 Lee, H., "The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains" 38 (38): 93-102, 1997

    8 Cachon, G. P., "The Allocation of Inventory Risk in a Supply Chain : Push, Pull, and Advance-Purchase Discount Contracts" 50 (50): 222-238, 2004

    9 Grßler, A., "System Dynamics as a Structural Theory in Operations Management" 17 (17): 373-384, 2008

    10 Cachon, G. P., "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts : Strengths and Limitations" 51 (51): 30-44, 2005

    1 서원준, "멀티에이전트시스템(MAS)을 이용한 G2B 조달 프로세스 혁신의 효과평가에 관한 연구 : 나라장터 G2B사례" 한국지능정보시스템학회 18 (18): 157-175, 2012

    2 Mortimer, J. H., "The effects of revenue-sharing contracts on welfare in vertically separated markets : Evidence from the video rental industry" 75 (75): 165-199, 2008

    3 김형진, "The Viral Effect of Online Social Network on New Products Promotion: Investigating Information Diffusion on Twitter" 한국지능정보시스템학회 18 (18): 107-130, 2012

    4 Kandel, E., "The Right to Return" 39 (39): 329-356, 1996

    5 Tsay, A. A., "The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives" 45 (45): 1339-1358, 1999

    6 Gonçalves, P., "The Impact of Endogenous Demand on Push-Pull Production Systems" 21 (21): 187-216, 2005

    7 Lee, H., "The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains" 38 (38): 93-102, 1997

    8 Cachon, G. P., "The Allocation of Inventory Risk in a Supply Chain : Push, Pull, and Advance-Purchase Discount Contracts" 50 (50): 222-238, 2004

    9 Grßler, A., "System Dynamics as a Structural Theory in Operations Management" 17 (17): 373-384, 2008

    10 Cachon, G. P., "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts : Strengths and Limitations" 51 (51): 30-44, 2005

    11 Taylor, T., "Supply Chain Coordination under Channel Rebates with Sales Effort Effects" 48 (48): 992-1007, 2002

    12 Mass, N., "Stock and Flo Variables and the Dynamics of Supply and Demand, In Elements of the System Dynamics Method" Pegasus Communications 1980

    13 Nellore, R., "Procurement Commodity Structures : Issues, Lessons and Contributions" 5 : 157-166, 1999

    14 Scott, W. R., "Organizations : Rational, Natural, and Open Systems" Prentice-Hall International Edition 1987

    15 Pasternack, B., "Optimal Pricing and Return Policies for Perishable Commodities" 2 : 166-176, 1985

    16 Farrell, J., "Optimal Contracts with Lock-In" 79 (79): 51-68, 1989

    17 Granot, D., "On the Effectiveness of Returns Policies in the Price-Dependent Newsvendor Model" 52 (52): 765-779, 2005

    18 Tsay, A. A., "Modeling Supply Chain Contracts : A Review. Quantitative Model for Supply Chain Management" Kluwer 1998

    19 Kilgore, M., "Mitigating supply chain risks. White paper" Chainalytics LLC 2003

    20 Dejonckheere, J., "Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect : A control theoretic approach" 147 (147): 567-590, 2003

    21 Lee, H., "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain : The Bullwhip Effect" 50 (50): 1875-1886, 2004

    22 Forrester, J. W., "Industrial Dynamics" MIT Press 1961

    23 이주윤, "Does Online Social Network Contribute to WOM Effect on Product Sales?" 한국지능정보시스템학회 18 (18): 55-105, 2012

    24 Fisher, M., "Configuring a supply chain to reduce the cost of demand uncertainty" 6 (6): 211-225, 1997

    25 Sterman, J. D., "Business Dynamics : Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World" Irwin–McGraw-Hill 2000

    26 Simon, H. A., "Bounded rationality and organizational learning" 2 (2): 125-134, 1991

    27 Bassok, Y., "Analysis of Supply Contracts with Total Minimum Commitment" 29 (29): 373-381, 1997

    28 Hendricks, K., "An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Supply Chain Disruptions on Long-Run Stock Price Performance and Equity Risk of the Firm" 14 (14): 35-52, 2005

    29 Narayanan, V. G., "Aligning Incentives in Supply Chains" 82 (82): 94-102, 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-03-25 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Intelligent Information Systems Society KCI등재
    2015-03-17 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-02-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국지능정보시스템학회 논문지 -> 지능정보연구 KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.51 1.51 1.99
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.78 1.54 2.674 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼